While more than 50 countries made congratulatory calls to president-elect William Lai (賴清德) over the weekend, with many international media outlets lauding Taiwan’s elections as “transparent,” an Internet celebrity seemed to hold a different view.
YouTuber Alisasa posted unverified videos from social media such as Douyin and TikTok, showing election staff counting the votes, seemingly “rigging” the results. As Alisasa was a supporter of Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), her posts accusing the Central Election Commission of election corruption went viral among the “little grass” — the nickname for TPP supporters — triggering outrage and disgust.
When the Taiwan FactCheck Center investigated and cleared up the disinformation, Alisasa deleted the posts and apologized for her “bad choice of words” — but not for her actions. Even Ko said “it is impossible to conduct large-scale rigging in Taiwan.”
While Taiwan is a democracy that protects freedom of speech, there is an uncrossable line. Alisasa’s videos are a classic example of China’s relentless cognitive warfare against Taiwan. Before election day, similar blatantly flawed videos were circulating, meant to persuade Taiwanese that democracy is not worth safeguarding. With the presidential election over, vilifying the vote counting as “flawed” without evidence not only shows oneself to be a bad sport, but hurls a great insult at election workers, the public and election integrity.
The incident shows that Chinese apps such as Douyin and Xiaohongshu are young people’s go-to for information. Despite the US, EU and other pro-Taiwan forces expressing concern about information security hazards and China-friendly narratives, many Taiwanese use them.
Instead of adopting a black-and-white approach of banning these apps outright — which would only trigger protests and condemnation from app users — it would be wiser to allow these companies to set up branches in Taiwan so the government could use regulations and guidelines to oversee them and crack down on fake accounts and rein in disinformation.
As these apps’s algorithms tend to “mute” some voices while amplifying others, echo chambers and bubbles have been created, with young people seeing “filtered” information in line with their values and opinions without access to competing perspectives. As social media have long been the TPP’s forte, young people have favored it over other political parties, and the election results confirm this: It secured more than half the votes of people younger than 35.
This is a warning for the DPP, as it appears to have lost young people’s support to the TPP when compared with President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) young voter support in 2020. Unlike the generation that led the Sunflower movement, the present young generation is composed of people who want to maintain the “status quo,” are aloof on politics, and prioritize the economy and daily life. Being born into a democratic society, they are not as aware of democracy’s frailty as their predecessors, and they tend to demonstrate young people’s nature of supporting those who promise to defy established systems.
TV news pundit and Taiwan Thinktank chief strategist Wang Yi-chuan (王義川) said he received a letter from a young person. The author wrote about many day-to-day issues the DPP has not addressed, but which Ko promised to reform, such as inflation, high rent, low wages, and judicial and education reform.
Despite the DPP’s exceptional accomplishments in diplomacy and the broader economy, young people tend not to recognize those feats. In other words, they consider the government to be out of touch — one of the reasons a large percentage of them have turned their backs on the DPP.
The DPP needs to step up its soul-searching, address issues affecting young people and communicate with them. Only by rekindling that touch and rapport can it reclaim the passion and confidence it once ignited.
A nation has several pillars of national defense, among them are military strength, energy and food security, and national unity. Military strength is very much on the forefront of the debate, while several recent editorials have dealt with energy security. National unity and a sense of shared purpose — especially while a powerful, hostile state is becoming increasingly menacing — are problematic, and would continue to be until the nation’s schizophrenia is properly managed. The controversy over the past few days over former navy lieutenant commander Lu Li-shih’s (呂禮詩) usage of the term “our China” during an interview about his attendance
Following the BRICS summit held in Kazan, Russia, last month, media outlets circulated familiar narratives about Russia and China’s plans to dethrone the US dollar and build a BRICS-led global order. Each summit brings renewed buzz about a BRICS cross-border payment system designed to replace the SWIFT payment system, allowing members to trade without using US dollars. Articles often highlight the appeal of this concept to BRICS members — bypassing sanctions, reducing US dollar dependence and escaping US influence. They say that, if widely adopted, the US dollar could lose its global currency status. However, none of these articles provide
Bo Guagua (薄瓜瓜), the son of former Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Committee Politburo member and former Chongqing Municipal Communist Party secretary Bo Xilai (薄熙來), used his British passport to make a low-key entry into Taiwan on a flight originating in Canada. He is set to marry the granddaughter of former political heavyweight Hsu Wen-cheng (許文政), the founder of Luodong Poh-Ai Hospital in Yilan County’s Luodong Township (羅東). Bo Xilai is a former high-ranking CCP official who was once a challenger to Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) for the chairmanship of the CCP. That makes Bo Guagua a bona fide “third-generation red”
US president-elect Donald Trump earlier this year accused Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) of “stealing” the US chip business. He did so to have a favorable bargaining chip in negotiations with Taiwan. During his first term from 2017 to 2021, Trump demanded that European allies increase their military budgets — especially Germany, where US troops are stationed — and that Japan and South Korea share more of the costs for stationing US troops in their countries. He demanded that rich countries not simply enjoy the “protection” the US has provided since the end of World War II, while being stingy with
RSS