Han Kuo-yu wrong choice
In Saturday’s election, no party secured a majority in the 113-member legislature, with the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) winning 51 seats, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) 52 and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) eight, making the TPP the key player in deciding whether an appointment or legislation would pass. That power is to be put to the test on Feb. 1, when the new batch of lawmakers are to be sworn in and elect a legislative speaker and deputy speaker.
Before the election, the blue camp said it would make KMT legislator-at-large in waiting Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) the new legislative speaker, and the white camp seemed to have no objection.
However, Citizen Congress Watch (公民監督國會聯盟) said that Han’s record as a legislator in the past was far from exemplary, while Legislative Speaker You Si-kun (游錫?) of the DPP, who was re-elected on Saturday as a legislator-at-large, was highly recognized for promoting parliamentary diplomacy and reform. Citizen Congress Watch said that the candidate for the post should be someone who is proficient in deliberation procedures and has excellent performance, so that Taiwanese can rest assured.
If Han, who is controversial, confrontational and unpredictable, is appointed speaker, the Legislative Yuan might become a political battlefield or a stage for personal and political theater, which is not conducive to deliberation and negotiation, and his appointment might even make the legislature the biggest source of chaos in the country.
The TPP and its chairman, Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), should listen to the opinions of all parties, carefully and objectively evaluate the pros and cons of Han, You or other candidates, and do not make their first strategic deployment in the new session of the Legislative Yuan monkey business.
Tien Fong-wen
New Taipei City
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
RSS