On Saturday, the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) presidential candidate, Vice President William Lai (賴清德), and his running mate, Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴), received 5,586,019 votes, emerging victorious in the presidential election. With more than 40 percent of all votes garnered, the ruling DPP has secured an unprecedented third consecutive term in office since the first direct presidential election in 1996.
Nevertheless, due to the DPP’s failure to secure a majority in the Legislative Yuan, the president-elect now faces a significant obstacle. In the legislative elections, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has obtained 52 seats, outnumbering the DPP by a single seat. The Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), the second-largest opposition party, would have eight seats in the next term, which could tremendously increase its influence on the other two parties in the legislature.
As no party would be dominating the Legislative Yuan in the next term, Lai would inevitably have to seek cross-party collaboration in his presidency. A potential coalition between the KMT and TPP could have the power to boycott the DPP’s legislative proceedings, which would make it even more problematic for the Lai administration to enforce reforms that are not trilaterally agreed upon. Many DPP supporters are worried that this situation might impede the policy agenda of the next government.
This is to be the second time the DPP is in charge as a minority government. During former president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) two terms in office in the 2000s, the KMT, the People First Party and the New Party formed a pan-blue coalition.
Being the majority in the Legislative Yuan, the coalition strongly opposed many of the government-backed bills and blocked numerous budgets for military purchases, resulting in constant clashes between the ruling and opposition sides. Many fear that if such a legislative deadlock occurs again in the next four years, government operations could be severely disrupted.
It is imperative that the new government negotiates with other parties to resolve differences and foster a more harmonious political environment.
If dialogue among the three political parties is effectively conducted, the next government can greatly accelerate its implementation of policies. In the past eight years, while President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) has been widely acclaimed for her ability to elevate Taiwan’s status in the international community, her domestic policies have also been harshly criticized by her political opponents. Lai, who is to succeed her, must show willingness to exchange ideas with the opposition parties.
By adopting other parties’ voices in the policymaking process, not only might he achieve what he could not do alone, but these parties might also become more eager to collaborate with him in spite of their differing political stances.
Prior to the presidential election, all three candidates emphasized the need for an open and multi-partisan government. With the new term of the Legislative Yuan commencing on Feb. 1, now would be the opportune time for the three parties to stay united and discuss national affairs in a cooperative manner.
The Legislative Yuan should no longer be a place for throwing pig intestines and water balloons, instead, it should be a place for mutual understanding and rational communication between the parties, where the needs of the public can be appropriately responded to.
Tshua Siu-ui is a Taiwanese student studying international relations and politics in Norwich, England.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
RSS