Saturday’s presidential and legislative elections have attracted the attention of the international community, and Taiwan’s voting procedure has generated much discussion and debate.
On an election day, voters first have their ID cards checked by staff upon arrival at the polling station, followed by voters putting a stamp or fingerprint on the name list. Voters then receive the ballots and mark whom they wish to vote for using the tools prepared by the election commission. Voters then fold the ballots in half and deposit them into ballot boxes according to the paper’s colors.
After polling, staff members manually count the ballots one by one, read the vote out loud and display it to the attending witnesses. After the counting at stations is completed, managers compile a written report of the results and post it on the bulletin board outside the station and then designate a courier to deliver the station results to the township electoral operation centers, so the results can be entered into a centralized computing system.
The Counting and Information Center for Election provides real-time election results. The public can check up-to-date polling counts through the Central Election Commission’s (CEC) Web site on election day.
While some have praised Taiwan’s voting system as transparent and prudent, some have called it obsolete for not incorporating electronic voting, postal voting and prepoll voting.
In face of China’s nefarious ploys to interfere in Taiwan’s elections, the current system — including in-person voting, paper ballots and manual counting — can prevent China’s hacking or electronic rigging.
Nevertheless, the linking between place of residence and voting rights have inconvenienced people and prevented those working or studying abroad, polling station staff and on-duty security officers from exercising their voting rights, while prisoners are also deprived of their rights.
According to the demographic breakdown released by the CEC, it is apparent that an aged society and low birthrate are the underlying reasons for generational conflicts. For young people working or studying away from their registered residence, the distance, the amount of traffic and time to travel discourage them from voting. On the other hand, retired elderly living in their registered residence have a higher turnout rate than young people. If the government wishes to introduce prepoll voting, postal voting or electronic voting, to ensure privacy and information security, it should wait until the technology matures and society reaches a consensus on the issue. To protect the voting rights of every citizen, conducting “nonresidence voting” by allowing people to vote near one’s place of study or work is a feasible direction for reform.
Jiang Zung-shiang is a lawyer. He holds a master’s degree in law from National Defense University.
Translated by Rita Wang
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS