Taiwan smoothly completed its presidential and legislative elections, demonstrating its mature democracy and triumph over China’s coercive interference and threats. However, as no party has a majority in the new legislature, the election has created a new “two big and one small” political scenario.
Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairman and Vice President William Lai (賴清德) won the presidency, delivering his party a record third consecutive term in office, the first since the country’s first direct presidential election in 1996. Voters have clearly shown resistance to China’s coercive interference, and endorsed Lai’s plan to continue President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) strategy of facing Beijing with neither provocation nor submissiveness, while seeking more support from international allies and working to resume dialogue with China.
However, compared with Tsai’s 2020 landslide win with more than 8 million votes, Lai’s tally, 5.5 million votes, was less than the combined total of the opposition party candidates, indicating that cross-strait tensions played a major, but less critical, role in the election. Lai would have a difficult time in power due to his party’s failure to secure a legislative majority with only 51 seats, while the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) won 52 and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) claimed eight.
As he promised to do in his post-election news conference, Lai and his administration would need to seek cross-party cooperation to promote policies such as expanding the defense budget, and financial reform of the national health and labor insurance programs, which he named as top priorities. The most urgent and difficult task would be the legislative speaker election and forming a new Cabinet, in which Lai pledged to recruit cross-party talent.
The KMT has gained 10 more legislative seats than in 2020, which once more makes it the biggest party in the legislature and proves its dominance in local factions, despite several candidates facing accusations of illegal property expansion and the leaking of confidential national defense information. Nevertheless, the KMT failed to secure more votes in the presidential election, 4 percent fewer than in 2020, and did not win more party votes in the legislative polling. This perhaps reflects continued public opposition to the party’s pro-China stance and foreign policy strategy.
The KMT could also face difficulties regaining the support of the TPP to secure a leading position in the legislature and to promote policy, due to lingering antipathy following the pre-election “blue-white alliance” debacle. It should also be concerned about internal turmoil as it reviews the electoral defeat and addresses the thorny issue of an intergenerational power shift, with the party failing to appeal to young voters.
The other smaller, but growing, opposition TPP is considered a big winner in the elections, with Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) winning more than 3.6 million votes, more than most pre-election polls would have suggested. It also picked up three more legislative seats to become a crucial third political force that could be decisive in making national policies. Ko has already announced his intention to run for the presidency in 2028.
However, the elections also affirmed that the TPP is a one-man party, as Ko’s presidential votes far outnumbered the party’s legislative votes. Ko received only 23 percent of votes in Taipei, the city he had been mayor of for eight years, showing his incompetence in administrative management. The party is also expected to face more political turmoil originating from its combination of multiparty politicians holding differing stances.
Taiwanese have voted to keep the DPP in power, while giving the KMT and TPP legislative oversight. Voters will be watching to see whether the three parties use this power responsibility.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS