Taiwan smoothly completed its presidential and legislative elections, demonstrating its mature democracy and triumph over China’s coercive interference and threats. However, as no party has a majority in the new legislature, the election has created a new “two big and one small” political scenario.
Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairman and Vice President William Lai (賴清德) won the presidency, delivering his party a record third consecutive term in office, the first since the country’s first direct presidential election in 1996. Voters have clearly shown resistance to China’s coercive interference, and endorsed Lai’s plan to continue President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) strategy of facing Beijing with neither provocation nor submissiveness, while seeking more support from international allies and working to resume dialogue with China.
However, compared with Tsai’s 2020 landslide win with more than 8 million votes, Lai’s tally, 5.5 million votes, was less than the combined total of the opposition party candidates, indicating that cross-strait tensions played a major, but less critical, role in the election. Lai would have a difficult time in power due to his party’s failure to secure a legislative majority with only 51 seats, while the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) won 52 and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) claimed eight.
As he promised to do in his post-election news conference, Lai and his administration would need to seek cross-party cooperation to promote policies such as expanding the defense budget, and financial reform of the national health and labor insurance programs, which he named as top priorities. The most urgent and difficult task would be the legislative speaker election and forming a new Cabinet, in which Lai pledged to recruit cross-party talent.
The KMT has gained 10 more legislative seats than in 2020, which once more makes it the biggest party in the legislature and proves its dominance in local factions, despite several candidates facing accusations of illegal property expansion and the leaking of confidential national defense information. Nevertheless, the KMT failed to secure more votes in the presidential election, 4 percent fewer than in 2020, and did not win more party votes in the legislative polling. This perhaps reflects continued public opposition to the party’s pro-China stance and foreign policy strategy.
The KMT could also face difficulties regaining the support of the TPP to secure a leading position in the legislature and to promote policy, due to lingering antipathy following the pre-election “blue-white alliance” debacle. It should also be concerned about internal turmoil as it reviews the electoral defeat and addresses the thorny issue of an intergenerational power shift, with the party failing to appeal to young voters.
The other smaller, but growing, opposition TPP is considered a big winner in the elections, with Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) winning more than 3.6 million votes, more than most pre-election polls would have suggested. It also picked up three more legislative seats to become a crucial third political force that could be decisive in making national policies. Ko has already announced his intention to run for the presidency in 2028.
However, the elections also affirmed that the TPP is a one-man party, as Ko’s presidential votes far outnumbered the party’s legislative votes. Ko received only 23 percent of votes in Taipei, the city he had been mayor of for eight years, showing his incompetence in administrative management. The party is also expected to face more political turmoil originating from its combination of multiparty politicians holding differing stances.
Taiwanese have voted to keep the DPP in power, while giving the KMT and TPP legislative oversight. Voters will be watching to see whether the three parties use this power responsibility.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS