Taiwan smoothly completed its presidential and legislative elections, demonstrating its mature democracy and triumph over China’s coercive interference and threats. However, as no party has a majority in the new legislature, the election has created a new “two big and one small” political scenario.
Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairman and Vice President William Lai (賴清德) won the presidency, delivering his party a record third consecutive term in office, the first since the country’s first direct presidential election in 1996. Voters have clearly shown resistance to China’s coercive interference, and endorsed Lai’s plan to continue President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) strategy of facing Beijing with neither provocation nor submissiveness, while seeking more support from international allies and working to resume dialogue with China.
However, compared with Tsai’s 2020 landslide win with more than 8 million votes, Lai’s tally, 5.5 million votes, was less than the combined total of the opposition party candidates, indicating that cross-strait tensions played a major, but less critical, role in the election. Lai would have a difficult time in power due to his party’s failure to secure a legislative majority with only 51 seats, while the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) won 52 and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) claimed eight.
As he promised to do in his post-election news conference, Lai and his administration would need to seek cross-party cooperation to promote policies such as expanding the defense budget, and financial reform of the national health and labor insurance programs, which he named as top priorities. The most urgent and difficult task would be the legislative speaker election and forming a new Cabinet, in which Lai pledged to recruit cross-party talent.
The KMT has gained 10 more legislative seats than in 2020, which once more makes it the biggest party in the legislature and proves its dominance in local factions, despite several candidates facing accusations of illegal property expansion and the leaking of confidential national defense information. Nevertheless, the KMT failed to secure more votes in the presidential election, 4 percent fewer than in 2020, and did not win more party votes in the legislative polling. This perhaps reflects continued public opposition to the party’s pro-China stance and foreign policy strategy.
The KMT could also face difficulties regaining the support of the TPP to secure a leading position in the legislature and to promote policy, due to lingering antipathy following the pre-election “blue-white alliance” debacle. It should also be concerned about internal turmoil as it reviews the electoral defeat and addresses the thorny issue of an intergenerational power shift, with the party failing to appeal to young voters.
The other smaller, but growing, opposition TPP is considered a big winner in the elections, with Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) winning more than 3.6 million votes, more than most pre-election polls would have suggested. It also picked up three more legislative seats to become a crucial third political force that could be decisive in making national policies. Ko has already announced his intention to run for the presidency in 2028.
However, the elections also affirmed that the TPP is a one-man party, as Ko’s presidential votes far outnumbered the party’s legislative votes. Ko received only 23 percent of votes in Taipei, the city he had been mayor of for eight years, showing his incompetence in administrative management. The party is also expected to face more political turmoil originating from its combination of multiparty politicians holding differing stances.
Taiwanese have voted to keep the DPP in power, while giving the KMT and TPP legislative oversight. Voters will be watching to see whether the three parties use this power responsibility.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS