Do not mock national alerts
Taiwan’s defense ministry on Tuesday afternoon last week sent out a nationwide emergency alert informing the public that China’s government at 3:04pm had just launched a satellite with its trajectory passing over southern Taiwan.
As a nation sitting along multiple fault lines in a highly active seismic zone and open to tsunamis on its Pacific coast, Taiwanese cannot afford to be too relaxed with their soft living and should stay vigilant.
One after another, from the Dutch colonization in earlier times to the Rover Incident and later Japanese colonization, Taiwan is no stranger to foreign invasion, and Chinese aggression is certainly Taiwan’s biggest concern.
However, following the alert, there have been online memes and sarcastic remarks mocking it. Some have even said the national-level alert was a Democratic Progressive Party election “ploy to boost its campaign,” which was a most dispiriting and embittering thing to say. How could anyone be so naive and ignorant?
Police stations across the nation conduct daily tests of the civil defense alert system, just in case major emergencies such as earthquakes, tsunamis or air raids occur. The alerts are to inform community members on how to respond and other implementable actions. Would anyone still consider such a measure to be “campaigning”?
Confucius once said “A man who does not think and plan long ahead is sure to find trouble right at his door.”
Japan is able to keep its casualties and damage to a minimum whenever disasters strike, because its people have long put great emphasis on alert and warning systems.
Although Taiwanese have complete freedom to express different opinions, mocking the national alert system is not the right mindset.
Chen Hsueh-chiang
Taipei
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS