Do not mock national alerts
Taiwan’s defense ministry on Tuesday afternoon last week sent out a nationwide emergency alert informing the public that China’s government at 3:04pm had just launched a satellite with its trajectory passing over southern Taiwan.
As a nation sitting along multiple fault lines in a highly active seismic zone and open to tsunamis on its Pacific coast, Taiwanese cannot afford to be too relaxed with their soft living and should stay vigilant.
One after another, from the Dutch colonization in earlier times to the Rover Incident and later Japanese colonization, Taiwan is no stranger to foreign invasion, and Chinese aggression is certainly Taiwan’s biggest concern.
However, following the alert, there have been online memes and sarcastic remarks mocking it. Some have even said the national-level alert was a Democratic Progressive Party election “ploy to boost its campaign,” which was a most dispiriting and embittering thing to say. How could anyone be so naive and ignorant?
Police stations across the nation conduct daily tests of the civil defense alert system, just in case major emergencies such as earthquakes, tsunamis or air raids occur. The alerts are to inform community members on how to respond and other implementable actions. Would anyone still consider such a measure to be “campaigning”?
Confucius once said “A man who does not think and plan long ahead is sure to find trouble right at his door.”
Japan is able to keep its casualties and damage to a minimum whenever disasters strike, because its people have long put great emphasis on alert and warning systems.
Although Taiwanese have complete freedom to express different opinions, mocking the national alert system is not the right mindset.
Chen Hsueh-chiang
Taipei
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
RSS