On Jan. 6, 2021, in Washington, DC, then-US president Donald Trump, the loser of the 2020 election, famously addressed a gathering of followers who then joined the mob that attacked the US Capitol. While rambling and incoherent, Trump’s speech nonetheless made a few things clear: Leftists had conspired to steal the election by fraud, and the mobs summoned to Washington on his behalf would need to “stand strong.” The implication was that violence might be necessary, because “you’ll never take back your country with weakness.”
Trump then made then-US vice president Mike Pence the target of collective scorn for refusing to send the Electoral College process back to the states. If “weak Republicans” would not step up and participate in overturning the results, Trump vowed, “we will … never ever forget.” For the next four to five hours, in the most recorded event in US history, the world watched as a new Lost Cause was born in violence and spectacular lies.
There have been numerous Lost Causes in modern history, usually following defeats in war, where the vanquished glorify their loss as a source of pride and shared animosity toward the victors. Three big Lost Causes have plagued world and US history. Following their bloody defeat in the Franco-Prussian War of 1870-1871, the French exhibited an intergenerational cultural need to avenge the loss.
Following Germany’s defeat in World War I, the Nazis gained traction by blaming Jews and leftists, who were depicted as “poisons” in the blood of the body politic. Another example is the US South after the American Civil War, when the narrative of the Confederate Lost Cause yielded a potent brew of twisted history and white supremacist ideology.
Lost Cause narratives sometimes have been powerful enough to build or destroy political regimes, shape national and ethnic identities, and fill landscapes with monuments. They work primarily as powerful new founding myths, always advancing a politics of grievance that turns into retribution, and sometimes victory.
Immediately after the military surrender in 1865, forms of the Confederate Lost Cause took root in a Southern society marked by physical destruction, the psychological trauma of defeat, resistance to the victors’ policy of Reconstruction, racial violence and — with time — carefully constructed sentimentalism.
Specifically, the Confederate Lost Cause claimed that Southern soldiers had shown unfailing valor, and that the South had not really lost, but merely succumbed to superior numbers and resources. Southern white women allegedly supported the cause to the bitter end and helped preserve the “truthful” memory; the Confederacy’s enslaved black population supposedly remained loyal to their owners; and, finally, the Confederates had never really fought for slavery, but rather for “home,” national sovereignty and states’ rights.
To be sustained as public propaganda, Lost Causes need a pure narrative with clearly identified villains and heroes. Sometimes, they are havens of sick souls; other times, they are the means to power for a disciplined political movement. Trump’s Lost Cause, now newly virulent as he campaigns for a second term despite multiple indictments, draws on a menu of grievances among the disaffected, energizing those who believe that a “diversity”-obsessed multicultural US has veered out of control, especially in relation to immigration at the Mexican border.
Some are also staunch believers in conspiracy theories about “fraud” allegedly committed in the 2020 election, as well as other dark notions of leftist machinations in US universities, on school boards, and in the US Democratic Party. Unlike the Confederate Lost Cause, the Trump version is a kind of gangster cult, full of loyalty rituals to a single man and his plans to fashion an authoritarian US government that would use executive power to achieve his followers’ preferences.
Trump’s Lost Cause also has its martyrs, including the hundreds of convicted insurrectionists — known in the movement, and by US Republican Party politicians such as Elise Stefanik, as “hostages” — now in prison. Above all, it peddles a model of politics and society according to which facts and evidence are irrelevant. At Trump rallies, constitutionalism is for losers, history is little more than a useful weapon and US civics is mere entertainment, deployed for attendees eager to indulge their hatred of liberalism, representative democracy and — in many cases — of non-white US. The Trump Lost Cause is thus a platform, one that the US Republican Party has adopted to convert these stories, lies and entertainments into votes. Win or lose, it would not die.
Many writers are trying to help us navigate these fraught times. In Tim O’Brien’s new novel, America Fantastica, a ragtag collection of misfits and down-and-outs embark on a series of lawless escapades, including bank robberies and various other forms of larceny. The reader gets a glimpse of a society where lying is utterly ubiquitous, and where a “mythomania” has swept the country, led by a “monster” of a US president.
At least in the Confederate Lost Cause, white Southerners truly had to endure colossal mourning: Nearly 300,000 people lay in graves across their landscape, and much of their society lay in ruins. Trumpian mourning seems rooted in social-media-driven nostalgia for an ideal past that almost no one experienced. The movement’s supporters long for a vanished racial order, for a world of secure social identities preserved from unknown but hated elites and for communities that have not been drained of cohesion by the internet, the pandemic and economic displacement. They need their story to be great again.
Lost Causes can turn lies into common coin and forge deep and lasting myths. We are a long way from knowing how much staying power the Trumpian Lost Cause would have, regardless of whether he survives his criminal charges and the election campaign. What we do know is that we have already witnessed its formative years.
David W. Blight is the Sterling Professor of history at Yale University and author of the Pulitzer prize-winning Frederick Douglass: Prophet of Freedom.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS