Years of harrowing losses have left Chinese stocks with a diminished standing in global portfolios, a trend that is likely to accelerate as some of the world’s biggest funds distance themselves from the risk-ridden market.
An analysis of filings by 14 US pension funds with investments in Chinese stocks show most of them have reduced their holdings since 2020. The California Public Employees’ Retirement System and New York State Common Retirement Fund, among the nation’s biggest pension investors, cut their exposure for a third straight year.
What started out as a performance-driven exodus now risks becoming a structural shift due to a toxic combination of doubts over Beijing’s long-term economic agenda, a prolonged property crisis and strategic competition with the US. Money managers at some of the biggest pensions in the US and Australia said in interviews that the prevailing playbook for China is one of caution.
Illustration: Yusha
“Foreign investors no longer fear leaving China out of their investment universe,” Dalma Capital Management Ltd chief investment officer Gary Dugan said. “We sense that international investors are just giving up trying to read China and will revert to a world-ex-China opportunity set, hence resetting the benchmarks to MSCI World ex-China.”
Some are exiting entirely.
DIVESTMENT
Missouri State Employees’ Retirement System in December told its staff to “divest from all of its current global public equity investment in China.” That came a month after the US Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board said it would exclude investments in Hong Kong, in addition to mainland China, from its US$68 billion international fund. It cited Washington’s increasing investment restrictions on China as a key reason for the decision.
“China is a recurring discussion among US and global CIOs,” California State Teachers’ Retirement System (CALSTRS) chief investor officer Chris Ailman said in an interview. “Some have cut their index weight in half to reduce their exposure and a few have dropped China from their emerging market index.”
CALSTRS’ decision is to “not be overweight nor underweight but index weight,” he said.
His comments come as China’s share in the MSCI Emerging Markets Index dropped to 23.77 percent as of end December, the lowest since mainland stocks were added to the gauge in 2018. In the Asia Pacific Index, China now accounts for about 15 percent, down from 24 perent in 2020.
A survey last year of 100 pension and sovereign wealth managers by London-based think tank Official Monetary and Financial Institutions Forum found none of them have a positive outlook on China, or see higher relative returns.
It is a far cry from the late 2010s when the country’s economic ascent and manufacturing prowess made overseas investors eager for a slice of the booming market. If MSCI’s addition of A-shares showcased China’s global acceptance, its falling status speaks to that allure fast fading.
Bloomberg analyzed 13F filings by 271 US pension funds with assets over US$500 million. Among them, 14 had investments in US-listed Chinese stocks.
Underscoring how Chinese markets are dropping off radars, their low valuations are not helping. The MSCI China Index has never been this cheap versus the S&P 500 when looking at forward earnings estimates, trading at a 56 percent discount. The estimated price-to-earnings ratio is below its five-year average.
Australia’s second-largest pension fund, the A$260 billion (US$174 billion) Australian Retirement Trust, is wary of raising its China holdings beyond what is needed to stay in line with performance benchmarks.
“In public equities, we are just trying to make sure that we have a benchmark exposure and we do it in a way that doesn’t tie up liquidity unnecessarily,” ART’s chief investment officer Ian Patrick said. “It’s a big economy where valuations are challenged and so there’s definitely opportunity there.” He added the bigger question was how the global order plays out between China and the US, and other countries.
As long-term investors shun China, the market risks becoming even more dominated by local traders — heightening volatility and scaring away global funds. The MSCI China Index has extended declines after capping a third annual loss. Money managers deem tensions with the US and Europe, the state’s grip over the private sector and the economy’s downward trend as having permanently undermined its attraction.
PESSIMISM
As China flops, investments excluding the country have prospered. The number of new emerging-markets equity-focused funds with no China exposure reached 19 last year, up from 15 in 2022 and just one in 2020, Bloomberg data show.
Wall Street titans including Goldman Sachs Asset Management and BlackRocks Inc launched new emerging-market ex-China funds earlier last year, while Robeco and Vontobel Holding AG have more recently joined the wave.
In a landmark shift, assets held by the iShares ETF for emerging-markets ex-China surged to about US$8.8 billion from just US$164 million at the end of 2020, exceeding that of a China ETF.
That is not to say the whole world has turned its back on China. Its US$9 trillion market — the second-largest after the US — offers a trove of undiscovered firms that might deliver hefty gains. As HSBC Holdings PLC strategists said earlier this month, there has been increasing interest from investors based in the Middle East, offsetting the outflows from the US.
Other Australian pension funds are taking a wait-and-see stance. AMP Investments, which currently has a slight underweight exposure, might change that in the coming years as China recovers, according to the fund’s chief investment officer Anna Shelley.
Yet the pivot away from China might accelerate as positive catalysts are missing at a time when the Federal Reserve shifts toward monetary easing, raising the odds of higher returns in emerging markets that are sensitive to the global economic cycle.
South Korea and India have so far seen a total inflow of more than US$550 million this year. However, inflows into China via stock connect links have remained volatile after a record five months of outflows.
“Although much of the pessimism around China seem currently reflected in valuations, investors seem reluctant to step in,” said William Blair International Ltd portfolio specialist Romina Graiver, one of the early entrants into emerging-markets ex-China strategies.
“Over the past years China has become more difficult to navigate due to an unpredictable regulatory environment and government’s prioritization of politics over economics in the wake of Covid,” he added.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS