Years of harrowing losses have left Chinese stocks with a diminished standing in global portfolios, a trend that is likely to accelerate as some of the world’s biggest funds distance themselves from the risk-ridden market.
An analysis of filings by 14 US pension funds with investments in Chinese stocks show most of them have reduced their holdings since 2020. The California Public Employees’ Retirement System and New York State Common Retirement Fund, among the nation’s biggest pension investors, cut their exposure for a third straight year.
What started out as a performance-driven exodus now risks becoming a structural shift due to a toxic combination of doubts over Beijing’s long-term economic agenda, a prolonged property crisis and strategic competition with the US. Money managers at some of the biggest pensions in the US and Australia said in interviews that the prevailing playbook for China is one of caution.
Illustration: Yusha
“Foreign investors no longer fear leaving China out of their investment universe,” Dalma Capital Management Ltd chief investment officer Gary Dugan said. “We sense that international investors are just giving up trying to read China and will revert to a world-ex-China opportunity set, hence resetting the benchmarks to MSCI World ex-China.”
Some are exiting entirely.
DIVESTMENT
Missouri State Employees’ Retirement System in December told its staff to “divest from all of its current global public equity investment in China.” That came a month after the US Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board said it would exclude investments in Hong Kong, in addition to mainland China, from its US$68 billion international fund. It cited Washington’s increasing investment restrictions on China as a key reason for the decision.
“China is a recurring discussion among US and global CIOs,” California State Teachers’ Retirement System (CALSTRS) chief investor officer Chris Ailman said in an interview. “Some have cut their index weight in half to reduce their exposure and a few have dropped China from their emerging market index.”
CALSTRS’ decision is to “not be overweight nor underweight but index weight,” he said.
His comments come as China’s share in the MSCI Emerging Markets Index dropped to 23.77 percent as of end December, the lowest since mainland stocks were added to the gauge in 2018. In the Asia Pacific Index, China now accounts for about 15 percent, down from 24 perent in 2020.
A survey last year of 100 pension and sovereign wealth managers by London-based think tank Official Monetary and Financial Institutions Forum found none of them have a positive outlook on China, or see higher relative returns.
It is a far cry from the late 2010s when the country’s economic ascent and manufacturing prowess made overseas investors eager for a slice of the booming market. If MSCI’s addition of A-shares showcased China’s global acceptance, its falling status speaks to that allure fast fading.
Bloomberg analyzed 13F filings by 271 US pension funds with assets over US$500 million. Among them, 14 had investments in US-listed Chinese stocks.
Underscoring how Chinese markets are dropping off radars, their low valuations are not helping. The MSCI China Index has never been this cheap versus the S&P 500 when looking at forward earnings estimates, trading at a 56 percent discount. The estimated price-to-earnings ratio is below its five-year average.
Australia’s second-largest pension fund, the A$260 billion (US$174 billion) Australian Retirement Trust, is wary of raising its China holdings beyond what is needed to stay in line with performance benchmarks.
“In public equities, we are just trying to make sure that we have a benchmark exposure and we do it in a way that doesn’t tie up liquidity unnecessarily,” ART’s chief investment officer Ian Patrick said. “It’s a big economy where valuations are challenged and so there’s definitely opportunity there.” He added the bigger question was how the global order plays out between China and the US, and other countries.
As long-term investors shun China, the market risks becoming even more dominated by local traders — heightening volatility and scaring away global funds. The MSCI China Index has extended declines after capping a third annual loss. Money managers deem tensions with the US and Europe, the state’s grip over the private sector and the economy’s downward trend as having permanently undermined its attraction.
PESSIMISM
As China flops, investments excluding the country have prospered. The number of new emerging-markets equity-focused funds with no China exposure reached 19 last year, up from 15 in 2022 and just one in 2020, Bloomberg data show.
Wall Street titans including Goldman Sachs Asset Management and BlackRocks Inc launched new emerging-market ex-China funds earlier last year, while Robeco and Vontobel Holding AG have more recently joined the wave.
In a landmark shift, assets held by the iShares ETF for emerging-markets ex-China surged to about US$8.8 billion from just US$164 million at the end of 2020, exceeding that of a China ETF.
That is not to say the whole world has turned its back on China. Its US$9 trillion market — the second-largest after the US — offers a trove of undiscovered firms that might deliver hefty gains. As HSBC Holdings PLC strategists said earlier this month, there has been increasing interest from investors based in the Middle East, offsetting the outflows from the US.
Other Australian pension funds are taking a wait-and-see stance. AMP Investments, which currently has a slight underweight exposure, might change that in the coming years as China recovers, according to the fund’s chief investment officer Anna Shelley.
Yet the pivot away from China might accelerate as positive catalysts are missing at a time when the Federal Reserve shifts toward monetary easing, raising the odds of higher returns in emerging markets that are sensitive to the global economic cycle.
South Korea and India have so far seen a total inflow of more than US$550 million this year. However, inflows into China via stock connect links have remained volatile after a record five months of outflows.
“Although much of the pessimism around China seem currently reflected in valuations, investors seem reluctant to step in,” said William Blair International Ltd portfolio specialist Romina Graiver, one of the early entrants into emerging-markets ex-China strategies.
“Over the past years China has become more difficult to navigate due to an unpredictable regulatory environment and government’s prioritization of politics over economics in the wake of Covid,” he added.
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS