The presidential election was a competitive three-way race, of which Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) candidate Vice President William Lai (賴清德) became the winner. However, Lai received only 40.05 percent of the total votes and the DPP did not win the majority of legislative seats. In other words, to carry out its agendas, the DPP would need the support of opposition parties. First and foremost, they must reach a consensus concerning the cross-strait relationship.
Due to their different pasts, the pan-blue and pan-green camps see China differently and it is only natural that their political strategies and cross-strait policies differ. Over the past few decades, both sides have focused on political struggles, demonizing the other without seeing common ground. Consequently, an agreement is hardly attainable, solidarity cannot be established and Taiwan’s ability to confront China is weakened.
A consensus could and should be achieved. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is more oriented toward China, whereas the DPP wants to keep its distance from Beijing. Yet both parties and their supporters want to maintain freedom and democracy as a way of life, insisting on the Republic of China’s sovereignty and refusing to be “unified” with China. This is the fundamental ground on which Taiwanese stand together in the face of China.
The KMT and the DPP should seek the greatest common denominator under the banners of “democratic coexistence” and “solidarity co-living.”
The value of “democratic coexistence” must be upheld and the key is to underscore the two parties’ similarities. Given that the KMT and the DPP would defend Taiwan’s democracy, they should collaborate based on the principle of democratic coexistence while fending off China’s efforts to change the “status quo.” The two parties should avoid labeling each other as China’s “fellow traveler” that betrays Taiwan or stigmatizing Taiwanese independence as “toxic.” Only in doing so could the parties reach an agreement on cross-strait policy and enhance the nation’s solidarity to withstand China. Every political party should realize the importance of coopereation to gain more leverage, so that Taiwan’s voice in the international community could be amplified and its legitimacy consolidated.
In this sense, the differences between the two parties’ policies should be minimized to achieve “solidarity co-living.” Once the KMT and the DPP are willing to respect each other in a democracy, both sides could compromise on their strategic differences. The DPP should make an effort to understand KMT supporters’ “long-distance Chinese nationalism” and revise its cross-strait policy accordingly in a flexible, realistic manner. This would strengthen the DPP’s agenda of maintaining the “status quo” of the Republic of China in Taiwan. The KMT should also make an effort to respect the DPP’s past, based on which the DPP and its supporters affirm Taiwan’s autonomy and sovereignty. In this sense, maintenance of the “status quo” of the Republic of China in Taiwan should be the core of the so-called “1992 consensus.”
Undeniably, Taiwanese have developed a national consciousness. The majority, regardless of pan-blue or pan-green camp affiliation, do not want to be a part of China — a reality Beijing fails to recognize. In facing China, all Taiwan’s political parties should seek common ground despite their differences. With solidarity established, Taiwan’s democratic values and strategic location could be fully utilized to resolve unfavorable situations. In doing so, Taiwan would be able to request that China change and establish a stable relationship across the Taiwan Strait. It is hoped that president-elect Lai would work toward such a future, leading Taiwan forward.
Michael Lin is a retired diplomat who served in the US.
Translated by Emma Liu
Would China attack Taiwan during the American lame duck period? For months, there have been worries that Beijing would seek to take advantage of an American president slowed by age and a potentially chaotic transition to make a move on Taiwan. In the wake of an American election that ended without drama, that far-fetched scenario will likely prove purely hypothetical. But there is a crisis brewing elsewhere in Asia — one with which US president-elect Donald Trump may have to deal during his first days in office. Tensions between the Philippines and China in the South China Sea have been at
Russian President Vladimir Putin’s hypersonic missile carried a simple message to the West over Ukraine: Back off, and if you do not, Russia reserves the right to hit US and British military facilities. Russia fired a new intermediate-range hypersonic ballistic missile known as “Oreshnik,” or Hazel Tree, at Ukraine on Thursday in what Putin said was a direct response to strikes on Russia by Ukrainian forces with US and British missiles. In a special statement from the Kremlin just after 8pm in Moscow that day, the Russian president said the war was escalating toward a global conflict, although he avoided any nuclear
A nation has several pillars of national defense, among them are military strength, energy and food security, and national unity. Military strength is very much on the forefront of the debate, while several recent editorials have dealt with energy security. National unity and a sense of shared purpose — especially while a powerful, hostile state is becoming increasingly menacing — are problematic, and would continue to be until the nation’s schizophrenia is properly managed. The controversy over the past few days over former navy lieutenant commander Lu Li-shih’s (呂禮詩) usage of the term “our China” during an interview about his attendance
Bo Guagua (薄瓜瓜), the son of former Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Committee Politburo member and former Chongqing Municipal Communist Party secretary Bo Xilai (薄熙來), used his British passport to make a low-key entry into Taiwan on a flight originating in Canada. He is set to marry the granddaughter of former political heavyweight Hsu Wen-cheng (許文政), the founder of Luodong Poh-Ai Hospital in Yilan County’s Luodong Township (羅東). Bo Xilai is a former high-ranking CCP official who was once a challenger to Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) for the chairmanship of the CCP. That makes Bo Guagua a bona fide “third-generation red”
RSS