As we enter the new year, I want to focus on several areas of concern to those of us hoping for greater tranquility and cooperation throughout the region. This is a theme I have written upon before, but it seems worth returning to the subject, since 2024 could very well be a rocky time for the island state.
The fact of the matter is the People’s Republic of China appears firmly under the autocratic hand of Chairman/President Xi Jinping (習近平). I use the word “appears” because the inner workings of the country are difficult for outsiders to fully grasp.
That said, Xi has demonstrated a tendency to bully his neighbors and lust after territorial gains that fly in the face of historic trends. Xi doesn’t seem at all comfortable with the established boundaries throughout the region.
He appears to be in firm control of all the key levers of power within his kingdom. But that can be a tricky business, as Beijing’s strongman does not appear to solicit the opinions or suggestions of the “yes men” (and they are almost all men) he has surrounded himself with.
One of the troubles I have observed in such regimes is the lack of new thinking flowing up the chain. The strongman doesn’t appear to solicit or encourage input into his decisions. On the contrary, this sort of top-down leader seems quick to brush aside any alternative narratives concerning national power.
Xi is not alone. His partner in authoritarianism, Russian President Vladimir Putin, has managed to bog his country down in a prolonged territorial war with Ukraine for two long and bloody years. In the absence of any public feedback, it becomes increasingly difficult to grasp what the people of Russia really want. Meanwhile there is the inscrutable strongman of North Korea, who has been planning for yet another familial successor in one of the dreariest dictatorships on the planet.
Turning to a brighter subject, my favorite Asian island-state on Saturday held its critical presidential and legislative elections. President-elect William Lai (賴清德) and his chosen running mate, Taiwan’s able former representative to Washington Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴), will now lead the nation forward. Hsiao will bring even more gravitas to the Lai administration.
The Democratic Progressive Party will retain central power, although it has lost its majority in the Legislative Yuan. China obviously did not want to see this happen. Meanwhile, Beijing’s aggressive behavior in the coastal waters around Taiwan — as well as with its neighboring countries — only deepens outrage from most of the rest of Asia.
I remain uncertain just how realistic Xi is about his domestic situation, to say nothing of his intentions toward the rest of East Asia. By all public accounts, China lacks any regional friends or partners beyond Moscow and Pyongyang. All three of these authoritarian one-party states have plenty of domestic problems to cope with. Nor have they demonstrated any desire to address them, beyond repression and denial.
In a promising development, Japan has recently demonstrated greater willingness to push back on China, moving away from Beijing’s tendency to bring up World War Two guilt — as if that war just ended. In a move widely welcomed throughout the region, Tokyo has been beefing up its military power. It is extending a friendly hand to Taiwan, its former colony, and — after a long hiatus — improving frosty relations with South Korea.
Meanwhile the American Presidential contest is continuing to heat up. Former US president Donald Trump appears to have secured the inside pole on the Republican nomination. That said, a few voices have registered concern over the man’s many legal problems, as well as his bombastic rhetoric aimed at just about everything and everyone.
US President Biden just turned 81. But for my money, he seems able and mentally ready to continue in office if the American voters so determine next November. His prudent lifestyle is a near opposite of Mr. Trump’s.
Biden, while hampered by ongoing turmoil in the Middle East and Ukraine, retains a balanced and forward-looking approach to East Asian policy. His California session with Xi hopefully has calmed waters in that critical bilateral relationship, at least for now.
I do think it will be important, considering his age, for Biden to ensure he had the right person standing in the wings if necessary. So far, he seems to be sticking with US Vice President Kamala Harris, and it seems to be getting late for Biden to switch horses. Traditionally, American Vice Presidents gain little press or attention in our top-heavy system. Nonetheless, I have personally been impressed by Harris.
I want to conclude on an upbeat note. I believe Biden will gain the second term his sagacious leadership deserves. He needs to increase Harris’ substantive role in things, particularly given the possibility she might have to assume the top role in government, should Biden’s health take a turn for the worse.
I am at heart an optimist. I have been following events in East Asia and the former Soviet Union for most of my professional career as an American diplomat. There is plenty to encourage optimism.
Barring a dramatic shift in politics in either Moscow or Beijing, I believe the strong and stabilizing role the United States has played in the region for over seventy years will continue. This will be a godsend to Taiwan, especially assuming next year’s elections maintain the stability there that Taipei deserves. Through all this, the rock-solid bipartisan support for Taiwan in Washington will be an essential factor in preserving peace and stability.
Wishing all my friends in Taiwan a Happy New Year of the Dragon!
Ambassador Stephen M. Young (ret.) lived in Kaohsiung as a boy over 50 years ago, and served in AIT four times: as a young consular officer (1981-’82), as a language student (1989-’90), as Deputy Director (1998-2001) and as Director (2006-’9). He visits often and writes regularly about Taiwan matters. Young was also US Ambassador to Kyrgyzstan and Consul General to Hong Kong during his 33-year career as a foreign service officer. He has a BA from Wesleyan University and a PhD from the University of Chicago.
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s