With Vice President William Lai (賴清德) winning the presidential election, but his Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) failing to secure a majority in the legislature on Saturday, his administration is poised to face challenges over the next four years. The obstacles ahead involve not only Taiwan’s thorny relations with China, but also the new domestic political scene and an uncertain global economy.
In President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) eight years in office, Taiwan strengthened its partnership with Asia-Pacific countries and formed a consensus with several like-minded nations on regional security. Lai is expected to continue Tsai’s foreign and defense policies such as bolstering ties with the US, Japan and other countries in the Indo-Pacific region, and building new weapons such as submarines and fighter jets.
In the run-up to Saturday’s elections, China used the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) as a political bargaining chip against Taiwan, and the suspension of beneficial tariffs on several Taiwanese goods is sure to impact domestic industries. Unlike the other two candidates who talked about restarting ECFA negotiations with China, Lai focused on assisting local industries through digital transformation and advocates innovation-driven models to improve firms’ operations. Still, his adminstration should help Taiwanese firms to expand their global presence.
However, Lai faces the daunting task of facilitating meaningful dialogue across the Taiwan Strait without succumbing to Chinese pressure or decreasing Taipei’s goodwill toward Beijing. As Taiwan’s export-oriented economy relies on participation in regional trade blocs, Lai’s administration is expected to step up participation in trade deals such as the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership and the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework, to avoid becoming marginalized in the global economy and to respond to China’s growing economic coercion.
The approach Tsai adopted has seen Taiwan gradually reduce its trade reliance on China and increasingly embrace other markets, resulting in significant economic growth and domestic investment over the past eight years. For instance, GDP expanded to NT$23.54 trillion (US$756.21 billion) last year from NT$17.06 trillion in 2015, and GDP per capita even surpassed South Korea’s for the first time in 20 years in 2022. The government’s incentive packages also led to 1,400 companies investing more than NT$2.1 trillion in Taiwan from 2019 to last year.
However, Taiwanese manufacturers no longer focus solely on low-cost contract manufacturing. Instead, the success of the nation’s semiconductor industry and robust shipments of information and communications technology products amid an artificial intelligence boom has made developing high-value, high-margin products the core of domestic industrial transformation and economic value in the post-COVID-19 era.
Due to changes in global politics and economic situations, Taiwanese industries face pressure to transform. Lai’s economic platforms have focused on building an innovative economy and smart nation, involving accelerating the development of semiconductors and artificial intelligence-related technologies, promoting financial technology innovations, as well as continuing investments in green energy, cybersecurity and national defense. He also envisions a future where traditional industries thrive on value-added innovation, net zero carbon emissions and digital technology.
The president-elect also emphasizes policies that promote domestic service industry development, such as in hospitality and tourism, as the industry accounts for about 60 percent of Taiwan’s employment and plays an important role in supporting local small and medium-sized enterprises. Yet he still faces the same problems his predecessor faced, such as high home prices, a low national birthrate and a widening wealth gap. Furthermore, the difficult tasks of accelerating wage growth, creating jobs for young people and promoting talent development also await him.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS