The recent death of a junior-high student who was stabbed several times with a switchblade by a schoolmate in New Taipei City triggered fierce controversy.
Aside from condemning the female student involved in the argument that led to the stabbing, and the male student who did the stabbing, some accused the school and faculty of mismanagement and not having conducted a thorough search of students’ possessions.
Some even blamed the New Taipei City Government and the Ministry of Education for negligence before the presidential election.
However, the public should be smart enough to know that mindless recriminations and anger do not help the situation.
People familiar with education in the nation would be aware that counseling and guidance regulations stipulate that teachers cannot search students’ bags without good reason.
A while ago, a legislator held a news conference, saying a public vocational high school teacher’s search of students’ luggage during a field trip was “a violation of rules and dereliction of duty.” Even if teachers do get a tip-off of students bringing in dangerous goods, no one would dare to search students’ bags and personal items unless they are 100 percent sure of what they would find. Blaming the school for failing to confiscate the switchblade in question would be akin to blaming a bus driver for failing to stop a would-be perpetrator of sexual harassment from getting onto the bus.
News reports said that the male student who stabbed the other student was a juvenile delinquent sent to the Juvenile Detention House by the juvenile court. Even though young people should have equal rights to education, if such a student were to appear on campus, the school would not have the time and resources to always keep an eye on the individual.
People used to promote the idea that teachers are teachers, disciplinarians and mentors, yet how are teachers to discipline students if there are no support systems to facilitate this? In view of this fatal incident, it is not enough to simply call on the government to “step up guidance and counseling,” and assume that things would change.
Instead, the government should introduce “on-campus isolation” and “school suspension” regulations. Young people who exhibit delinquent behavior, or those who violate others’ rights to education should be detained at the school security center by security officers, or have the offending student take online courses in a small classroom by themselves.
Schools should retain the full right to conduct the assessment and disciplinary measures. While every student has the right to education, the law should not only protect the rights of the minority who demonstrate risky behavior, but also the rights of the majority of students.
As Taiwan has been imitating the education systems of other nations in promoting the idea of making students masters of learning, endowing them with more freedom and flexibility, experts and those in power should be thorough with their imitation.
In other nations, they place as much emphasis on family education as school education. Everyone wishes that the next generation would recieve a normal education and grow up to be good people. For this to happen, both family and school should play their part in educating students, and not pass the buck to the other.
After the loss of the junior-high school student, every Taiwanese should take action to change things.
The last thing we should do is to sit by and watch another tragedy unfurl or see children having to bring self-defense equipment to schools.
Chen Wu-yu is a senior-high school teacher.
Translated by Rita Wang
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s