As the presidential election enters the final countdown, all three tickets are using every second to woo votes.
In a popular YouTube video circulating this week, an interviewer asks college students about who they would vote for, with most saying Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), indicating Ko’s immense popularity among young people.
Why is he so strongly favored by young people given his many flaws?
Simply put, young people are rebels without a cause. Fed up with the long-term rivalry and conflict between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), they find Ko and his party “less detestable” than the others.
Of course, Ko is not without his charm and possesses other qualities that young people find appealing. A National Taiwan University doctor who claims to have a high IQ, Ko fires razor-sharp, off-the-cuff remarks that are often controversial, if not inappropriate. His remarks often carry a defiant undertone that resonates with young people, making him “their cup of tea.”
In terms of diplomacy and international relations, Ko seldom touches upon issues like Taiwan’s relations with the US or China, and even when he does, his pronouncements are more fantastical than realistic. Regarding China, he says he seeks a middle way of neither pushing back nor appeasing. His devil-may-care, nonchalant attitude has struck a chord with young people. After all, they do not enjoy the sounds and furies of politics, they only wish to carry on leading quiet lives, away from having to think about the quagmire of cross-strait relations.
However, young people are forgetting that their “quiet lives” are the result of the blood and toil of their forebears in fighting for freedom and democracy. Taiwan would not have the freedom it has today if not for the relentless efforts paid in blood by DPP democracy advocates. Without former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) democratic reforms and former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) carrying the democratic baton forward, Taiwan would still be a one-party state instead of a multi-party system. Only with President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) eight years of exceptional diplomatic and domestic leadership has Taiwan become Asia’s top democracy and economy.
Young people should remember that democracy is not something that fell from the sky. It is a fragile thing and could be easily lost if not carefully protected. They have the right to avert or despise politics, but they must remember that the quiet lives that they wish to hold on to are based on their nation’s democratic system.
It is easy to be cynical and vote for Ko to teach the KMT and the DPP a lesson. However, a ballot has never been a mere piece of paper, but a decisive tool in determining a nation’s fate and its people.
The biggest issue with Ko is neither his cunning, capriciousness nor his acting like a mommy’s boy, but his cavalier attitude toward cross-strait policy and other international relations. To Taiwan, nothing matters more than this.
Taiwan’s high-tech industry would not be able to thrive without the right allies by its side. If Taiwan and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (台積電) were to fall into the hands of China, Taiwan would find itself on the US sanctions list. Without the US’ chip design, there would be no need for chip manufacturing, not to mention economic and domestic issues that are closely associated with cross-strait relations.
Politics lies at the root of the workings of a nation. Young people must not choose someone who is “hip” or “cool” at an impulse over one who has a decisive vision and well-founded policies for the nation. Every ballot could become the key to changing Taiwan’s future.
Tread carefully, young people, for you might be treading on your dreams.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS