As the presidential election enters the final countdown, all three tickets are using every second to woo votes.
In a popular YouTube video circulating this week, an interviewer asks college students about who they would vote for, with most saying Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), indicating Ko’s immense popularity among young people.
Why is he so strongly favored by young people given his many flaws?
Simply put, young people are rebels without a cause. Fed up with the long-term rivalry and conflict between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), they find Ko and his party “less detestable” than the others.
Of course, Ko is not without his charm and possesses other qualities that young people find appealing. A National Taiwan University doctor who claims to have a high IQ, Ko fires razor-sharp, off-the-cuff remarks that are often controversial, if not inappropriate. His remarks often carry a defiant undertone that resonates with young people, making him “their cup of tea.”
In terms of diplomacy and international relations, Ko seldom touches upon issues like Taiwan’s relations with the US or China, and even when he does, his pronouncements are more fantastical than realistic. Regarding China, he says he seeks a middle way of neither pushing back nor appeasing. His devil-may-care, nonchalant attitude has struck a chord with young people. After all, they do not enjoy the sounds and furies of politics, they only wish to carry on leading quiet lives, away from having to think about the quagmire of cross-strait relations.
However, young people are forgetting that their “quiet lives” are the result of the blood and toil of their forebears in fighting for freedom and democracy. Taiwan would not have the freedom it has today if not for the relentless efforts paid in blood by DPP democracy advocates. Without former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) democratic reforms and former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) carrying the democratic baton forward, Taiwan would still be a one-party state instead of a multi-party system. Only with President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) eight years of exceptional diplomatic and domestic leadership has Taiwan become Asia’s top democracy and economy.
Young people should remember that democracy is not something that fell from the sky. It is a fragile thing and could be easily lost if not carefully protected. They have the right to avert or despise politics, but they must remember that the quiet lives that they wish to hold on to are based on their nation’s democratic system.
It is easy to be cynical and vote for Ko to teach the KMT and the DPP a lesson. However, a ballot has never been a mere piece of paper, but a decisive tool in determining a nation’s fate and its people.
The biggest issue with Ko is neither his cunning, capriciousness nor his acting like a mommy’s boy, but his cavalier attitude toward cross-strait policy and other international relations. To Taiwan, nothing matters more than this.
Taiwan’s high-tech industry would not be able to thrive without the right allies by its side. If Taiwan and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (台積電) were to fall into the hands of China, Taiwan would find itself on the US sanctions list. Without the US’ chip design, there would be no need for chip manufacturing, not to mention economic and domestic issues that are closely associated with cross-strait relations.
Politics lies at the root of the workings of a nation. Young people must not choose someone who is “hip” or “cool” at an impulse over one who has a decisive vision and well-founded policies for the nation. Every ballot could become the key to changing Taiwan’s future.
Tread carefully, young people, for you might be treading on your dreams.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS