As the presidential election enters the final countdown, all three tickets are using every second to woo votes.
In a popular YouTube video circulating this week, an interviewer asks college students about who they would vote for, with most saying Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), indicating Ko’s immense popularity among young people.
Why is he so strongly favored by young people given his many flaws?
Simply put, young people are rebels without a cause. Fed up with the long-term rivalry and conflict between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), they find Ko and his party “less detestable” than the others.
Of course, Ko is not without his charm and possesses other qualities that young people find appealing. A National Taiwan University doctor who claims to have a high IQ, Ko fires razor-sharp, off-the-cuff remarks that are often controversial, if not inappropriate. His remarks often carry a defiant undertone that resonates with young people, making him “their cup of tea.”
In terms of diplomacy and international relations, Ko seldom touches upon issues like Taiwan’s relations with the US or China, and even when he does, his pronouncements are more fantastical than realistic. Regarding China, he says he seeks a middle way of neither pushing back nor appeasing. His devil-may-care, nonchalant attitude has struck a chord with young people. After all, they do not enjoy the sounds and furies of politics, they only wish to carry on leading quiet lives, away from having to think about the quagmire of cross-strait relations.
However, young people are forgetting that their “quiet lives” are the result of the blood and toil of their forebears in fighting for freedom and democracy. Taiwan would not have the freedom it has today if not for the relentless efforts paid in blood by DPP democracy advocates. Without former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) democratic reforms and former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) carrying the democratic baton forward, Taiwan would still be a one-party state instead of a multi-party system. Only with President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) eight years of exceptional diplomatic and domestic leadership has Taiwan become Asia’s top democracy and economy.
Young people should remember that democracy is not something that fell from the sky. It is a fragile thing and could be easily lost if not carefully protected. They have the right to avert or despise politics, but they must remember that the quiet lives that they wish to hold on to are based on their nation’s democratic system.
It is easy to be cynical and vote for Ko to teach the KMT and the DPP a lesson. However, a ballot has never been a mere piece of paper, but a decisive tool in determining a nation’s fate and its people.
The biggest issue with Ko is neither his cunning, capriciousness nor his acting like a mommy’s boy, but his cavalier attitude toward cross-strait policy and other international relations. To Taiwan, nothing matters more than this.
Taiwan’s high-tech industry would not be able to thrive without the right allies by its side. If Taiwan and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (台積電) were to fall into the hands of China, Taiwan would find itself on the US sanctions list. Without the US’ chip design, there would be no need for chip manufacturing, not to mention economic and domestic issues that are closely associated with cross-strait relations.
Politics lies at the root of the workings of a nation. Young people must not choose someone who is “hip” or “cool” at an impulse over one who has a decisive vision and well-founded policies for the nation. Every ballot could become the key to changing Taiwan’s future.
Tread carefully, young people, for you might be treading on your dreams.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS