Dear Taiwanese, you are living in a critical moment in your history. In two days’ time, you will face a choice that will determine your future: whether to accept or reject a proposed referendum on unification with China.
You might have heard the arguments from both sides. The pro-unification camp claims that joining China would bring you economic benefits, security guarantees and cultural integration. They say that you are all Chinese, and that you should embrace our common destiny.
The anti-unification camp warns that joining China means losing your freedom, democracy and identity. They say that you are a sovereign and independent nation, and that you should defend your rights and values.
Who is right? Who is wrong? How should you decide?
I urge you to look beyond the slogans and propaganda, and to think for yourselves. I urge you to learn from the lessons of history, and to see the reality of the present.
Look at Tibet, a once proud and independent nation, that was invaded and annexed by China in 1951. Since then, Tibetans have suffered decades of oppression, repression and assimilation. Our culture, religion and language have been systematically eroded and marginalized. Our human rights have been violated and ignored. Our land and resources have been exploited and plundered. Our protests and resistance have been met with violence and brutality.
Look at Hong Kong, a former British colony, that was handed over to China in 1997. Under the “one country, two systems” arrangement, Hong Kong was supposed to enjoy a high degree of autonomy and freedom for 50 years. In reality, China has steadily eroded Hong Kong’s autonomy and freedom, by interfering in its elections, judiciary, media and education. China has also imposed a National Security Law that has criminalized dissent and protest, and has allowed mainland authorities to arrest and extradite anyone they consider a threat. Hong Kongers have taken to the streets to demand their rights and democracy, but they have been met with tear gas, rubber bullets and arrests.
Is this the future you want for yourselves? Is this the future you want for your children?
I believe that the answer is “no.” I believe that you have the right to determine your own future, without coercion or intimidation. I believe that you have the right to preserve your freedom, democracy and identity, without compromise or surrender. I believe that you have the right to pursue your happiness, without fear or regret.
You are not anti-China. You are pro-Taiwan. You respect and appreciate the cultural and historical ties that you share with China, but you also recognize and cherish the differences and diversity that make you unique. You are willing and ready to cooperate and coexist with China, but you are not willing and ready to submit and merge with China.
You are not alone. You have the support and solidarity of the international community, especially the democratic countries that share our values and interests. You have the strength and resilience of your people, especially the young generation that has grown up with a strong sense of national identity and civic responsibility. You have the hope and vision of your future, especially the potential and opportunity that awaits you in the 21st century.
I urge you to vote for your future. Vote for your freedom. Vote for your democracy. Vote for your identity. Vote for Taiwan.
Thank you for your attention and participation. May God bless Taiwan.
Khedroob Thondup is a former member of the Tibetan parliament in exile.
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s