“China will surely be reunified, and all Chinese on both sides of the Taiwan Strait should be bound by a common sense of purpose and share in the glory of the rejuvenation of the Chinese nation.” Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) New Year’s message leaves little room for doubt concerning his resolve to take Taiwan, “by force if necessary,” as he has repeatedly said over the past decade.
Democracies across the world are alarmed by Beijing’s growing assertiveness, especially in light of Taiwan’s presidential election on Saturday. Under Xi’s rule, China has threatened peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific region and beyond, challenging the rules-based international order, while promoting an authoritarian alternative governance model. This has deteriorated China’s global image.
Responding to shifting perceptions, international media coverage of Taiwan’s elections has centered on the existential threat from China, but failed to pay enough attention to other pressing issues in public debates.
In European media, that narrow focus reveals ignorance of Taiwan beyond cross-strait relations, hence an inability to take a comprehensive view of the elections considering the domestic issues that Taiwanese voters face. Everyday problems are the ones Taiwanese voters care about most.
These include socioeconomic issues related to high living costs (particularly for housing), low wages, a declining birthrate, insufficient care for preschool children and the elderly, road safety, corruption, and Taiwan’s energy transition and its pollution implications. While threats from China have increased, demands for socioeconomic reforms have played a more significant role than in previous elections.
The outcome of the race between Democratic Progressive Party candidate Vice President William Lai (賴清德), Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) and Taiwan People’s Party Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) could more significantly affect the country’s democratic governance than cross-strait relations. Yet, European commentators are ignoring these key election issues.
Taiwan has already moved up the EU’s political agenda and risen in its discourse, while the bloc has started to pursue economic and political de-risking of its relations with China. The latter has created space for the former in current European narratives. It is essential that the EU pursues these two dynamics together.
While its relationship with China is defined by mutual distrust rather than strategic trust, the EU now sees Taiwan as a like-minded and trustworthy partner, one it can engage with as they both rethink their relations with China. EU-Taiwan relations can be a genuine win-win, but only through strategic mutual engagement and investment.
The EU must invest more in bringing Taiwan closer to Europeans with all of its diversity and the challenges it faces, many of which they share, namely how to enhance social justice, address demographic shifts and improve economic structures to benefit all, and achieve economic security. Without a better understanding of Taiwan’s domestic landscape, Europe cannot improve the mutual awareness necessary to contribute to each other’s resilience — economically and democratically.
As the largest foreign investor in Taiwan facing Chinese threats, Europe has reason to worry about its interests in the country. Europe also has good reason to continue to engage Taiwan as a democracy that faces the homegrown challenges this election reveals, but also external threats. The future of democracy is at stake if Xi pursues his ambitions to annex Taiwan.
For the past three decades, Taiwanese have worked hard — and bottom-up — to establish a democratic system that is rooted in transparency, rule of law and human rights. The system they have built is the opposite of Xi’s top-down, opaque, authoritarian rule. Maintaining and improving on their democracy defines Taiwanese identity. Losing it would mean being stripped of that identity.
It is in Europe’s interest to support democratic efforts and prevent such a loss.
Also, regardless of who Taiwan’s next leader is, it remains in the interest of the Taiwanese to keep Europe, its fourth-largest trading partner, close as an ally that has contributed significantly to expanding its internationalization.
From June 6 to June 9, it would be Europeans’ turn to exercise their democratic rights to shape their future. At a time of significant geopolitical shifts, the European Parliament elections would likely be dominated by socioeconomic issues, concerns that European voters deal with in their everyday lives: cost of living and inflation, job creation, migration and increasing fuel prices, among others.
By engaging Europe on these issues, Taiwan can improve its understanding of the bloc’s diversity and complexity. It would serve the interests of both sides to help each other tackle the domestic problems they both face through international collaboration.
Rather than allowing China to dominate — and constrain — the discourse, Europe and Taiwan should be coming together about their shared domestic concerns. Through strategically planning and implementing economic and diplomatic exchanges, Taiwan and Europe can continue contributing to the pursuit of shared goals — economic and political, international and domestic.
Zsuzsa Anna Ferenczy is assistant professor at National Dong Hwa University in Hualien and a former political adviser in the European Parliament.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS