“China will surely be reunified, and all Chinese on both sides of the Taiwan Strait should be bound by a common sense of purpose and share in the glory of the rejuvenation of the Chinese nation.” Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) New Year’s message leaves little room for doubt concerning his resolve to take Taiwan, “by force if necessary,” as he has repeatedly said over the past decade.
Democracies across the world are alarmed by Beijing’s growing assertiveness, especially in light of Taiwan’s presidential election on Saturday. Under Xi’s rule, China has threatened peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific region and beyond, challenging the rules-based international order, while promoting an authoritarian alternative governance model. This has deteriorated China’s global image.
Responding to shifting perceptions, international media coverage of Taiwan’s elections has centered on the existential threat from China, but failed to pay enough attention to other pressing issues in public debates.
In European media, that narrow focus reveals ignorance of Taiwan beyond cross-strait relations, hence an inability to take a comprehensive view of the elections considering the domestic issues that Taiwanese voters face. Everyday problems are the ones Taiwanese voters care about most.
These include socioeconomic issues related to high living costs (particularly for housing), low wages, a declining birthrate, insufficient care for preschool children and the elderly, road safety, corruption, and Taiwan’s energy transition and its pollution implications. While threats from China have increased, demands for socioeconomic reforms have played a more significant role than in previous elections.
The outcome of the race between Democratic Progressive Party candidate Vice President William Lai (賴清德), Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) and Taiwan People’s Party Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) could more significantly affect the country’s democratic governance than cross-strait relations. Yet, European commentators are ignoring these key election issues.
Taiwan has already moved up the EU’s political agenda and risen in its discourse, while the bloc has started to pursue economic and political de-risking of its relations with China. The latter has created space for the former in current European narratives. It is essential that the EU pursues these two dynamics together.
While its relationship with China is defined by mutual distrust rather than strategic trust, the EU now sees Taiwan as a like-minded and trustworthy partner, one it can engage with as they both rethink their relations with China. EU-Taiwan relations can be a genuine win-win, but only through strategic mutual engagement and investment.
The EU must invest more in bringing Taiwan closer to Europeans with all of its diversity and the challenges it faces, many of which they share, namely how to enhance social justice, address demographic shifts and improve economic structures to benefit all, and achieve economic security. Without a better understanding of Taiwan’s domestic landscape, Europe cannot improve the mutual awareness necessary to contribute to each other’s resilience — economically and democratically.
As the largest foreign investor in Taiwan facing Chinese threats, Europe has reason to worry about its interests in the country. Europe also has good reason to continue to engage Taiwan as a democracy that faces the homegrown challenges this election reveals, but also external threats. The future of democracy is at stake if Xi pursues his ambitions to annex Taiwan.
For the past three decades, Taiwanese have worked hard — and bottom-up — to establish a democratic system that is rooted in transparency, rule of law and human rights. The system they have built is the opposite of Xi’s top-down, opaque, authoritarian rule. Maintaining and improving on their democracy defines Taiwanese identity. Losing it would mean being stripped of that identity.
It is in Europe’s interest to support democratic efforts and prevent such a loss.
Also, regardless of who Taiwan’s next leader is, it remains in the interest of the Taiwanese to keep Europe, its fourth-largest trading partner, close as an ally that has contributed significantly to expanding its internationalization.
From June 6 to June 9, it would be Europeans’ turn to exercise their democratic rights to shape their future. At a time of significant geopolitical shifts, the European Parliament elections would likely be dominated by socioeconomic issues, concerns that European voters deal with in their everyday lives: cost of living and inflation, job creation, migration and increasing fuel prices, among others.
By engaging Europe on these issues, Taiwan can improve its understanding of the bloc’s diversity and complexity. It would serve the interests of both sides to help each other tackle the domestic problems they both face through international collaboration.
Rather than allowing China to dominate — and constrain — the discourse, Europe and Taiwan should be coming together about their shared domestic concerns. Through strategically planning and implementing economic and diplomatic exchanges, Taiwan and Europe can continue contributing to the pursuit of shared goals — economic and political, international and domestic.
Zsuzsa Anna Ferenczy is assistant professor at National Dong Hwa University in Hualien and a former political adviser in the European Parliament.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS