An unprecedented 60 countries are holding national elections this year. British newspaper the Observer last month called 2024 “democracy’s super bowl,” as the outcomes of those polls would determine whether democratic nations, including the US and the UK, or authoritarian powers, such as Russia and Iran, would control and direct the 21st century. Taiwan’s legislative and presidential elections on Saturday are to be among the world’s most hotly contested and of crucial international importance, especially to the interests of Washington and Beijing.
The outcome in Taiwan would “provide a valuable demonstration of how highly democracy is still valued — when a determined people are allowed a real choice amid fierce external pressures,” the Observer said, referring to China’s attempts to interfere in the elections.
Since its first direct presidential election in 1996, Taiwan has held seven presidential elections, and China has tried to meddle in all of them, aiming to annex its neighbor as part of its expansionist ambitions and Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) so-called “great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation.” In 1996, the Chinese People’s Liberation Army fired missiles into waters within 46km to 65km of Taiwan, in an incident known as the Third Taiwan Strait Crisis. In 2000, China released “The One China Principle and Taiwan Question” white paper in an attempt to influence the elections, threatening to use military force to oppose any attempt to “separate” Taiwan from China.
Aside from domestic issues such as the economy and housing affordability, China’s threats are ever-present and a crucial factor in the elections. Fortunately for Taiwan, but to China’s chagrin, Taiwanese have worked against Beijing’s desires, facilitating the nation’s transition from an authoritarian government to a liberal democracy. Taiwan is ranked as the top democracy in Asia, and leads in global assessments such as the Economist Intelligence Unit’s Democracy Index and the Human Freedom Index.
This year, Taiwan again faces China’s electoral interference attempts, which include a record-high number of military intrusions, economic sanctions, banning Chinese students and tourists from visiting Taiwan, spreading disinformation to stigmatize the government, suppressing Taiwan’s participation in international organizations to diplomatically isolate the nation, and offering incentives to Taiwanese to convince them to vote for pro-China candidates.
The opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and its presidential candidate, New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), have framed the elections as a choice between “war and peace,” while linking the so-called “1992 consensus” with Beijing’s “one China” principle, echoing China’s cognitive warfare propaganda. However, the poll has also been marked as a choice between democracy and autocracy. The Democratic Progressive Party and its presidential candidate, Vice President William Lai (賴清德), say this election is a choice between defending Taiwan’s democratic autonomy and endorsing a “red proxy” in support of Chinese authoritarianism.
Although Beijing is trying to sway Taiwanese voters, a growing number of reports and analyses show that China is unlikely to consider any major military actions against Taiwan soon, as it grapples with its own domestic economic challenges and political turmoil. China just expelled nine top military officers, including its defense minister. Also, the international community has made clear its support for peace in the Taiwan Strait, and opposition to war.
On Saturday, Taiwanese should vote to show the country’s strong will for self-determination, and make Taiwan’s election a model for the international community to safeguard democracy.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
RSS