An unprecedented 60 countries are holding national elections this year. British newspaper the Observer last month called 2024 “democracy’s super bowl,” as the outcomes of those polls would determine whether democratic nations, including the US and the UK, or authoritarian powers, such as Russia and Iran, would control and direct the 21st century. Taiwan’s legislative and presidential elections on Saturday are to be among the world’s most hotly contested and of crucial international importance, especially to the interests of Washington and Beijing.
The outcome in Taiwan would “provide a valuable demonstration of how highly democracy is still valued — when a determined people are allowed a real choice amid fierce external pressures,” the Observer said, referring to China’s attempts to interfere in the elections.
Since its first direct presidential election in 1996, Taiwan has held seven presidential elections, and China has tried to meddle in all of them, aiming to annex its neighbor as part of its expansionist ambitions and Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) so-called “great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation.” In 1996, the Chinese People’s Liberation Army fired missiles into waters within 46km to 65km of Taiwan, in an incident known as the Third Taiwan Strait Crisis. In 2000, China released “The One China Principle and Taiwan Question” white paper in an attempt to influence the elections, threatening to use military force to oppose any attempt to “separate” Taiwan from China.
Aside from domestic issues such as the economy and housing affordability, China’s threats are ever-present and a crucial factor in the elections. Fortunately for Taiwan, but to China’s chagrin, Taiwanese have worked against Beijing’s desires, facilitating the nation’s transition from an authoritarian government to a liberal democracy. Taiwan is ranked as the top democracy in Asia, and leads in global assessments such as the Economist Intelligence Unit’s Democracy Index and the Human Freedom Index.
This year, Taiwan again faces China’s electoral interference attempts, which include a record-high number of military intrusions, economic sanctions, banning Chinese students and tourists from visiting Taiwan, spreading disinformation to stigmatize the government, suppressing Taiwan’s participation in international organizations to diplomatically isolate the nation, and offering incentives to Taiwanese to convince them to vote for pro-China candidates.
The opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and its presidential candidate, New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), have framed the elections as a choice between “war and peace,” while linking the so-called “1992 consensus” with Beijing’s “one China” principle, echoing China’s cognitive warfare propaganda. However, the poll has also been marked as a choice between democracy and autocracy. The Democratic Progressive Party and its presidential candidate, Vice President William Lai (賴清德), say this election is a choice between defending Taiwan’s democratic autonomy and endorsing a “red proxy” in support of Chinese authoritarianism.
Although Beijing is trying to sway Taiwanese voters, a growing number of reports and analyses show that China is unlikely to consider any major military actions against Taiwan soon, as it grapples with its own domestic economic challenges and political turmoil. China just expelled nine top military officers, including its defense minister. Also, the international community has made clear its support for peace in the Taiwan Strait, and opposition to war.
On Saturday, Taiwanese should vote to show the country’s strong will for self-determination, and make Taiwan’s election a model for the international community to safeguard democracy.
Labubu, an elf-like plush toy with pointy ears and nine serrated teeth, has become a global sensation, worn by celebrities including Rihanna and Dua Lipa. These dolls are sold out in stores from Singapore to London; a human-sized version recently fetched a whopping US$150,000 at an auction in Beijing. With all the social media buzz, it is worth asking if we are witnessing the rise of a new-age collectible, or whether Labubu is a mere fad destined to fade. Investors certainly want to know. Pop Mart International Group Ltd, the Chinese manufacturer behind this trendy toy, has rallied 178 percent
My youngest son attends a university in Taipei. Throughout the past two years, whenever I have brought him his luggage or picked him up for the end of a semester or the start of a break, I have stayed at a hotel near his campus. In doing so, I have noticed a strange phenomenon: The hotel’s TV contained an unusual number of Chinese channels, filled with accents that would make a person feel as if they are in China. It is quite exhausting. A few days ago, while staying in the hotel, I found that of the 50 available TV channels,
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
There is no such thing as a “silicon shield.” This trope has gained traction in the world of Taiwanese news, likely with the best intentions. Anything that breaks the China-controlled narrative that Taiwan is doomed to be conquered is welcome, but after observing its rise in recent months, I now believe that the “silicon shield” is a myth — one that is ultimately working against Taiwan. The basic silicon shield idea is that the world, particularly the US, would rush to defend Taiwan against a Chinese invasion because they do not want Beijing to seize the nation’s vital and unique chip industry. However,
RSS