Most Taiwanese have felt the pinch of inflation surges and have cut back their spending on non-essential items in the past two years as the nation’s consumer price index hovers well above the central bank’s 2 percent target.
Taiwan’s inflation rate last year climbed 2.5 percent year-over-year. Elderly people in particular are feeling the burden of inflationary pressures as the first price gauge for seniors soared 2.8 percent annually, the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics’ (DGBAS) inflation data released last week show.
In 2022, the price increases felt by elderly people were even higher at 3.12 percent compared with 2021, versus the national inflation rate of 2.95 percent, according to the DGBAS’ pilot price program for elderly people, launched in 2019.
The price data on elderly people are becoming increasingly important for the government in drafting new welfare policies and building a safer social security net as Taiwan transitions into becoming an aged society with a rapidly rising population of people aged 65 years and older. By 2025, Taiwan is projected to become a super-aged society, meaning that people aged 65 years and older would make up 20 percent of the nation’s population and 37.5 percent in 2050, up from 18.37 percent last year, National Development Council statistics show.
Like the aging populations in the US and Japan, high inflation is eating into the purchasing power of elderly people and leading to food and medication cutbacks. The DGBAS attributed higher costs of food and non-medical care to greater inflation risks for elderly people. Those two categories made up significant portions — about 26 percent and 12.7 percent — of elderly people’s living expenses. Food prices climbed 4.04 percent last year, while non-medical care and other expenses rose 6.48 percent, the data showed.
Housing-related costs such as rent and electricity bills also made up a large chunk of their spending, accounting for 33.6 percent, DGBAS data show.
To help elderly people, low-income families and disadvantaged groups cope with rising inflation, the Ministry of Health and Welfare plans to beef up protection against inflation by boosting subsidy budgets by 7 percent this year to total NT$131.39 billion (US$4.24 billion), starting from 2020. The ministry reviews the subsidy payments every four years based on the nation’s inflation trend.
To some extent, the benefit increase should provide respite to elderly people, as the 7 percent benefit increase still lags behind the 8.16 percent price increases for elderly Taiwanese from the 2020-2023 period, leaving elderly Taiwanese anxious, data compiled by the DGBAS show.
As disabled elderly people who live alone face greater risks from price hikes, with food prices in particular, social workers have called for quick action to raise food subsidies. The Ministry of Health and Welfare in September last year responded positively and increased food subsidies from NT$80 to NT$100 per meal.
The ministry also increased transportation subsidies for social workers taking care of elderly people. However, it has also raised the bar for new applicants. Only low-income households are eligible to receive food subsidies. In the past, people aged 65 and older with middle-to-low incomes were eligible to apply for the meal subsidies.
It is also good to see the effect spreading, with local governments following the central government’s lead by giving a boost to food and other subsidy budgets for elderly people from disadvantaged families.
The government should consider amending related laws and give more flexibility to allocate government funds for immediate and sustainable support to better protect elderly Taiwanese and disadvantaged groups from losing buying power, as well as to build a safe social security net.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS