Most Taiwanese have felt the pinch of inflation surges and have cut back their spending on non-essential items in the past two years as the nation’s consumer price index hovers well above the central bank’s 2 percent target.
Taiwan’s inflation rate last year climbed 2.5 percent year-over-year. Elderly people in particular are feeling the burden of inflationary pressures as the first price gauge for seniors soared 2.8 percent annually, the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics’ (DGBAS) inflation data released last week show.
In 2022, the price increases felt by elderly people were even higher at 3.12 percent compared with 2021, versus the national inflation rate of 2.95 percent, according to the DGBAS’ pilot price program for elderly people, launched in 2019.
The price data on elderly people are becoming increasingly important for the government in drafting new welfare policies and building a safer social security net as Taiwan transitions into becoming an aged society with a rapidly rising population of people aged 65 years and older. By 2025, Taiwan is projected to become a super-aged society, meaning that people aged 65 years and older would make up 20 percent of the nation’s population and 37.5 percent in 2050, up from 18.37 percent last year, National Development Council statistics show.
Like the aging populations in the US and Japan, high inflation is eating into the purchasing power of elderly people and leading to food and medication cutbacks. The DGBAS attributed higher costs of food and non-medical care to greater inflation risks for elderly people. Those two categories made up significant portions — about 26 percent and 12.7 percent — of elderly people’s living expenses. Food prices climbed 4.04 percent last year, while non-medical care and other expenses rose 6.48 percent, the data showed.
Housing-related costs such as rent and electricity bills also made up a large chunk of their spending, accounting for 33.6 percent, DGBAS data show.
To help elderly people, low-income families and disadvantaged groups cope with rising inflation, the Ministry of Health and Welfare plans to beef up protection against inflation by boosting subsidy budgets by 7 percent this year to total NT$131.39 billion (US$4.24 billion), starting from 2020. The ministry reviews the subsidy payments every four years based on the nation’s inflation trend.
To some extent, the benefit increase should provide respite to elderly people, as the 7 percent benefit increase still lags behind the 8.16 percent price increases for elderly Taiwanese from the 2020-2023 period, leaving elderly Taiwanese anxious, data compiled by the DGBAS show.
As disabled elderly people who live alone face greater risks from price hikes, with food prices in particular, social workers have called for quick action to raise food subsidies. The Ministry of Health and Welfare in September last year responded positively and increased food subsidies from NT$80 to NT$100 per meal.
The ministry also increased transportation subsidies for social workers taking care of elderly people. However, it has also raised the bar for new applicants. Only low-income households are eligible to receive food subsidies. In the past, people aged 65 and older with middle-to-low incomes were eligible to apply for the meal subsidies.
It is also good to see the effect spreading, with local governments following the central government’s lead by giving a boost to food and other subsidy budgets for elderly people from disadvantaged families.
The government should consider amending related laws and give more flexibility to allocate government funds for immediate and sustainable support to better protect elderly Taiwanese and disadvantaged groups from losing buying power, as well as to build a safe social security net.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS