A magnitude 7.5 earthquake struck Japan’s Noto region at 4:10pm on Monday, causing many ground fissures, some measuring 50m long and 30cm deep, in Nanao, Ishikawa Prefecture, according to reports in the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper) and the Asahi Shimbun.
The Japanese Self-Defense Forces dispatched 1,000 personnel to help in the disaster relief, with 8,500 on standby, and the Japanese Fire and Disaster Management Agency sent 1,700 firefighters.
Tokyo Electric Power Co said the radioactive wastewater of the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear power plant’s No. 2, 3, 6 and 7 reactors leaked, but that there was no damage or leakage outside the premises, the Japan News reported.
Activated in 1985, the
Kashiwazaki-Kariwa plant has seven reactors, and its total capacity is 8.2 gigawatts, making it the largest nuclear-generating station in the world, however, it was shut down after the 2011 Tohoku earthquake.
The overflow of radioactive wastewater means that the used fuel rods were still placed in spent fuel pools without proper management, such as intermediate storage and final disposal, which is similar to the situation of the Guosheng Nuclear Power Plant in Wanli District (萬里), New Taipei City.
The used fuel rods have still not been removed from the reactors. We should be aware of the risks and consider the solution if a major earthquake strikes Taiwan.
Taiwan People’s Party presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) has proposed postponing the decommissioning of the
Guosheng and Ma-anshan (馬鞍山) plants, but ignored the management of high-level nuclear waste.
From the leak of radioactive wastewater caused by a major earthquake in Japan, we must think about the risk of the Guosheng Nuclear Power Plant; otherwise, politicians’ common slogan “no safety, no nuclear” is nothing but idle talk.
Chen Yi-nan is an arbitrator.
Translated by Chien Yan-ru
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS