A magnitude 7.5 earthquake struck Japan’s Noto region at 4:10pm on Monday, causing many ground fissures, some measuring 50m long and 30cm deep, in Nanao, Ishikawa Prefecture, according to reports in the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper) and the Asahi Shimbun.
The Japanese Self-Defense Forces dispatched 1,000 personnel to help in the disaster relief, with 8,500 on standby, and the Japanese Fire and Disaster Management Agency sent 1,700 firefighters.
Tokyo Electric Power Co said the radioactive wastewater of the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear power plant’s No. 2, 3, 6 and 7 reactors leaked, but that there was no damage or leakage outside the premises, the Japan News reported.
Activated in 1985, the
Kashiwazaki-Kariwa plant has seven reactors, and its total capacity is 8.2 gigawatts, making it the largest nuclear-generating station in the world, however, it was shut down after the 2011 Tohoku earthquake.
The overflow of radioactive wastewater means that the used fuel rods were still placed in spent fuel pools without proper management, such as intermediate storage and final disposal, which is similar to the situation of the Guosheng Nuclear Power Plant in Wanli District (萬里), New Taipei City.
The used fuel rods have still not been removed from the reactors. We should be aware of the risks and consider the solution if a major earthquake strikes Taiwan.
Taiwan People’s Party presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) has proposed postponing the decommissioning of the
Guosheng and Ma-anshan (馬鞍山) plants, but ignored the management of high-level nuclear waste.
From the leak of radioactive wastewater caused by a major earthquake in Japan, we must think about the risk of the Guosheng Nuclear Power Plant; otherwise, politicians’ common slogan “no safety, no nuclear” is nothing but idle talk.
Chen Yi-nan is an arbitrator.
Translated by Chien Yan-ru
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS