With the presidential and legislative elections just around the corner, the US aircraft carrier USS Carl Vinson has been traveling southward to the South China Sea. It is clear that the US aims to prevent China from intervening in Saturday’s elections, to ensure that the next president is elected without incident.
In the western Pacific Ocean, the US has the USS Ronald Reagan and its carrier strike group deployed near Japan’s Yokosuka. If the situation were to intensify, another carrier strike group could be dispatched immediately for assistance.
The Carl Vinson participated in joint military exercises involving several countries, including Australia, Canada, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, New Zealand, South Korea, Singapore and the UK.
On Dec. 17 last year, the carrier arrived in Singapore for a visit, before leaving on Dec. 25 for the South China Sea. The carrier strike group consisted of the Carl Vinson and its aircraft unit Carrier Air Wing 2, the USS Princeton, the USS Kidd and the USS Sterett.
When the Carl Vinson carrier strike group appeared in the South China Sea, the US said its purpose was to uphold freedom of navigation, as well as maintain peace and order in the international community.
However, as the US deployed two carrier strike groups close to Japan and in the South China Sea, it appears that the Carl Vinson carrier strike group’s purpose is to prevent any attempts to interfere with Taiwan’s elections.
Several reasons are behind this move.
First, the US wants to deter China from interfering with Taiwan’s elections. The Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) military threats always become more frequent and overt when Taiwan is about to hold elections.
The US’ deployment of the carrier strike groups intends to counter the CCP’s provocative activities, ensuring that the elections are carried out smoothly without foreign intervention.
Second, the US is showing off its military might, and aircraft carriers are the best way to do that. In the past few years, the CCP has been threatening Taiwan with its military activities.
Along with the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Air Force, Rocket Force and Strategic Support Force, Chinese carrier strike groups have been sent across the first island chain to the east of Taiwan. The Chinese aircraft carrier Liaoning used to play a significant role. From last year, the Shandong began to take up this role.
However, given that the USS carrier carries twice as many aircraft as the Liaoning, Taiwan and the US would be capable of handling a potential situation even if the Liaoning and the Shandong encroached on Taiwan.
Third, the US wants to show that the CCP aircraft carriers are not powerful enough to handle counterattacks. The Liaoning and Shandong were designed in line with the Soviet Union’s defensive carriers, whose major purpose was to defend against attacks from the sky. To contend with other warships, the Soviet ship were equipped with anti-ship missiles.
However, to increase their aircraft capacity, the CCP’s carriers are not equipped with such missiles. The Liaoning and Shandong use ski-jump takeoff systems, which means that aircraft cannot be fully loaded when launched, and hence their combat power is more limited.
The PLA carrier strike groups serve as convoy escort forces for the Renhai-class cruiser, which is equipped with YJ-18 anti-ship missiles and YJ-21 anti-ship ballistic missiles. Obviously, the CCP wants to make up for its lower counterattacking capabilities by enhancing the combat power of its Shenyang J-15 fighters.
Fourth, the US is bolstering ties with allies. Before the Carl Vinson visited Singapore, it participated in joint military exercises with several allies, all working together to deter an attack.
In a war scenario, the US and Japan would seek to protect the Miyako Strait and the area surrounding the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台), also known as the Senkaku Islands in Japan, while the US and Taiwan would look after the Bashi Channel and Balintang Channel. That way, the CCP’s carrier strike groups would not be able to break the first island chain, and Taiwan would not be threatened and its defensive power would be enhanced.
“A Taiwan emergency is a Japanese emergency, and therefore an emergency for the Japan-US alliance,” former Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe once said. As Taiwan’s presidential and legislative elections near, the Carl Vinson and its carrier strike group might head north to keep the South China Sea stable while defending the Taiwan Strait.
Ou Si-fu is a research fellow at the Institute for National Defense and Security Research.
Translated by Emma Liu
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS