The advertisement could read as follows: Landlocked country seeks a stretch of seacoast; payment for lease or purchase is negotiable, but cash is out of the question; motivated buyer is prepared to sweeten any contract with some freebies.
Sovereign real-estate deals might sound like ancient history — but they are still a thing. Even this year, a nation’s territory could be a commodity to be sold or rented at the right price. The practice might sound like pillage, but it is a better alternative to military coercion. On Monday, Ethiopia, the world’s most populous country without sea access, signed a preliminary deal to rent a 20km expanse of coast from its neighbor for half a century. Further negotiations, including over price and payment terms, are expected, and a final deal could come as soon as this year.
The problem? Well, there are many. For starters, the seller is a breakaway nation called Somaliland, which lacks international standing. The UN-recognized owner of the land — Somalia — says the deal is illegal. Then there is also the question of money: Ethiopia, embroiled in a simmering civil war, is an impoverished nation that defaulted on its international sovereign debt on Christmas day; instead of cash, it is offering a chunk of its state-owned airline. Ethiopia is also throwing in a diplomatic freebie: It would accept Somaliland as an independent state, further inflaming tensions in the Horn of Africa. The region is already witnessing several armed conflicts, plus mounting piracy in the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden, including across the sea from Yemen. So far, only Taiwan formally recognizes Somaliland as a nation, despite the African region having declared its independence in 1991.
Illustration: Louise Ting
The African continent’s last experiment with creating an independent state — South Sudan, in 2011 — did not work as planned, with the country falling back into civil conflict.
Splitting Somalia into two — or even three, as another breakaway region of Somalia called Puntland could follow suit — could create further failed states in a region that controls the mouth of the Red Sea. As such, the deal between Ethiopia and Somaliland is more than a historical oddity: It could deepen difficulties in a crucial choke point for global trade.
The history of international relations is dotted with countries buying or renting land from other sovereigns. In an early example, Scotland bought the Isle of Man and several other territories from Norway in 1266. Over the following centuries, countries including France, Russia, Denmark, the UK and Brazil engaged in land transactions. The US is in a class of its own: It bought large chunks of land from France in the Louisiana Purchase of the Mississippi basin; Florida from Spain; and Alaska from Russia as it assembled its transcontinental land mass.
The two most recent examples of sovereign land deals came in 1958 and 1963. In the former, Pakistan bought the port city of Gwadar, until then an enclave controlled by Oman, for the equivalent of US$2 billion in today’s money. In the latter, Germany bought back three small towns that it lost to the Netherlands at the end of World War II for the equivalent of 715 million euros — US$780 million today. Since then, the market for sovereign land acquisition has dried up. International borders have changed, mainly due to conflict. For example, Ethiopia lost its access to the sea in 1993 after Eritrea’s war for independence. Not too far away, Saudi Arabia and Egypt have been negotiating the fate of two islands in the Red Sea. Riyadh and Cairo agreed in 2017 that the Tiran and Sanafir islands in the northern Red Sea would be owned by Saudi Arabia. Shortly before the 2017 deal was signed, Saudi Arabia agreed to provide more than US$20 billion in financial and oil aid to Cairo, prompting many to see the two agreements as linked. Since then, Egyptian President Abdel-Fattah al-Sisi, under economic pressure at home, has been seeking further financial incentives. Of course, it takes two to deal, and the wannabe buyer often finds no seller or it thinks it already owns the land, such as in the current case of Venezuela claiming land controlled by Guyana. I do not see Ukraine renting its land to Russia — or Moscow offering to pay Kyiv.
Javier Blas is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering energy and commodities. He is coauthor of The World For Sale: Money, Power and the Traders Who Barter the Earth’s Resources. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s