Late last month, former Chinese navy commander Dong Jun (董軍) was appointed as the new defense minister after the post had been left vacant for some time. It is nigh impossible for the outside world to grasp the internal changes in China’s personnel, so we have little way of knowing the reason behind these personnel changes: We can only speculate on the reasons for this change.
Dong, from Yantai in China’s Shandong Province, was born in 1961 and graduated from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Dalian Naval Academy. He served as the director of training at the PLA Navy Command and deputy chief of staff of the North Sea Fleet. After being promoted to rear admiral in 2012, he became deputy commander of the East Sea Fleet in 2013, and in 2014 he became the deputy chief of staff of the navy.
Dong was promoted to deputy commander of the Southern Theater Command in 2017, where he was promoted to vice admiral in 2018. After experience in the command, he returned to the navy as the deputy commander in March 2021, later becoming the commander of the Chinese navy in August the same year. He was promoted to admiral in the next month.
In terms of his career, the navy has a diplomatic mission, but Dong’s appointment as China’s defense minister might be related to his experience in the North, the East and the South Sea fleets. From air and sea surveillance to specific ghost operations, Beijing’s frequent confrontations with other countries’ forces in the sea and airspace around China would be central during exchanges with foreign militaries.
Compared with his predecessor Li Shangfu (李尚福), who has a background in aerospace research, Dong, who used to serve in China’s three major theater commands and the navy, might have served mainly in the government’s military units. However, the duties of China’s defense minister today are no longer in war planning, arms building, troop deployment and military training, but in foreign military exchanges, so his experience might be more suited to the job. This is especially the case at a time when China and the US are gradually resuming military dialogue and the number of diplomatic exchanges with foreign militaries is also bound to increase, which is a possible reason for Dong being asked to step into this role now.
The third aspect is the possible missions that Dong would be asked to participate in. Dong served as the Chinese executive director of a joint military exercise between China and Russia in 2015, and he has had close interactions with the Russian military. In 2020, he served as the chief director of the first Sea Guardian joint naval exercise between China and Pakistan. He might even have been involved in the US-China theater dialogues until 2021. He has a wealth of experience in foreign military exchanges.
In addition to the geostrategic need to cooperate with Pakistan as a counterbalance in South Asia, it is even more important that China has military interaction and exchanges with Russia, a country with rich combat experience from the Russian-Ukrainian war. Plus, for the PLA, there is a strong Russian element in terms of the origin of equipment and in the Chinese command and control system. The PLA’s most urgent task in the short term must be how to maintain interactions with Moscow, and learn the lessons from Russia’s invasion of Ukraine to review PLA combat power after its military reform. These might be important missions for Dong in future military exchanges.
Lin Ying-yu is an assistant professor in Tamkang University’s Graduate Institute of International Affairs and Strategic Studies.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS