Late last month, former Chinese navy commander Dong Jun (董軍) was appointed as the new defense minister after the post had been left vacant for some time. It is nigh impossible for the outside world to grasp the internal changes in China’s personnel, so we have little way of knowing the reason behind these personnel changes: We can only speculate on the reasons for this change.
Dong, from Yantai in China’s Shandong Province, was born in 1961 and graduated from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Dalian Naval Academy. He served as the director of training at the PLA Navy Command and deputy chief of staff of the North Sea Fleet. After being promoted to rear admiral in 2012, he became deputy commander of the East Sea Fleet in 2013, and in 2014 he became the deputy chief of staff of the navy.
Dong was promoted to deputy commander of the Southern Theater Command in 2017, where he was promoted to vice admiral in 2018. After experience in the command, he returned to the navy as the deputy commander in March 2021, later becoming the commander of the Chinese navy in August the same year. He was promoted to admiral in the next month.
In terms of his career, the navy has a diplomatic mission, but Dong’s appointment as China’s defense minister might be related to his experience in the North, the East and the South Sea fleets. From air and sea surveillance to specific ghost operations, Beijing’s frequent confrontations with other countries’ forces in the sea and airspace around China would be central during exchanges with foreign militaries.
Compared with his predecessor Li Shangfu (李尚福), who has a background in aerospace research, Dong, who used to serve in China’s three major theater commands and the navy, might have served mainly in the government’s military units. However, the duties of China’s defense minister today are no longer in war planning, arms building, troop deployment and military training, but in foreign military exchanges, so his experience might be more suited to the job. This is especially the case at a time when China and the US are gradually resuming military dialogue and the number of diplomatic exchanges with foreign militaries is also bound to increase, which is a possible reason for Dong being asked to step into this role now.
The third aspect is the possible missions that Dong would be asked to participate in. Dong served as the Chinese executive director of a joint military exercise between China and Russia in 2015, and he has had close interactions with the Russian military. In 2020, he served as the chief director of the first Sea Guardian joint naval exercise between China and Pakistan. He might even have been involved in the US-China theater dialogues until 2021. He has a wealth of experience in foreign military exchanges.
In addition to the geostrategic need to cooperate with Pakistan as a counterbalance in South Asia, it is even more important that China has military interaction and exchanges with Russia, a country with rich combat experience from the Russian-Ukrainian war. Plus, for the PLA, there is a strong Russian element in terms of the origin of equipment and in the Chinese command and control system. The PLA’s most urgent task in the short term must be how to maintain interactions with Moscow, and learn the lessons from Russia’s invasion of Ukraine to review PLA combat power after its military reform. These might be important missions for Dong in future military exchanges.
Lin Ying-yu is an assistant professor in Tamkang University’s Graduate Institute of International Affairs and Strategic Studies.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Taiwan’s fall would be “a disaster for American interests,” US President Donald Trump’s nominee for undersecretary of defense for policy Elbridge Colby said at his Senate confirmation hearing on Tuesday last week, as he warned of the “dramatic deterioration of military balance” in the western Pacific. The Republic of China (Taiwan) is indeed facing a unique and acute threat from the Chinese Communist Party’s rising military adventurism, which is why Taiwan has been bolstering its defenses. As US Senator Tom Cotton rightly pointed out in the same hearing, “[although] Taiwan’s defense spending is still inadequate ... [it] has been trending upwards
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
In an eloquently written piece published on Sunday, French-Taiwanese education and policy consultant Ninon Godefroy presents an interesting take on the Taiwanese character, as viewed from the eyes of an — at least partial — outsider. She muses that the non-assuming and quiet efficiency of a particularly Taiwanese approach to life and work is behind the global success stories of two very different Taiwanese institutions: Din Tai Fung and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). Godefroy said that it is this “humble” approach that endears the nation to visitors, over and above any big ticket attractions that other countries may have
A media report has suggested that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) was considering initiating a vote of no confidence in Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) in a bid to “bring down the Cabinet.” The KMT has denied that this topic was ever discussed. Why might such a move have even be considered? It would have been absurd if it had seen the light of day — potentially leading to a mass loss of legislative seats for the KMT even without the recall petitions already under way. Today the second phase of the recall movement is to begin — which has
RSS