Right from the very outset of this election campaign season, it has seemed that young voters have been largely supporting Taiwan People’s Party Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲). They believe that supporting a candidate outside the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) could contribute toward ending the constant blue-green division.
The young electorate seldom watch political talk shows; instead, they make use of social media platforms including Line and TikTok to obtain information.
Blue-green division is an easy and relatively acceptable interpretation to voters. However, it de-emphasizes the efforts that the ruling party had made during the COVID-19 pandemic and ignores the suppression of Taiwan by the Chinese Communist Party.
The simplification of issues is attractive to young people, but it also encourages wrong judgements on what is actually happening. That is a drag on the progress of Taiwan’s democracy.
Japanese public broadcaster NHK reported that if a piece of fake news gets 14,000 views, a clarification merely attracts 700 views, showing that fake news has a disproportionately larger impact than the facts do.
There have been several cases in point over the past few years. Su Chii-cherng (蘇啟誠), director-general of the Osaka branch of the Taipei Economic and Cultural Office, committed suicide after he was falsely accused of misconduct. The person behind the Lin Bay Hao You (Lin Bay 好油) Facebook page claimed to have received death threats for criticizing the ruling DPP. Despite subsequent revelations that the allegations were unfounded, the fallout led to the resignation of the then-minister of agriculture.
DPP presidential candidate Vice President William Lai’s (賴清德) family house was said to be an illegal structure. Lai has been attacked by the false accusation that the residence, as well as neighboring houses, are illegal even after he pledged to donate it to charity.
Young people easily characterize political controversies as the blue-green division, but the government should take more careful action to deal with the complicated situation in Taiwan.
Parties are expected to think rationally and to end constant fights.
The process of interpartisan competition and Taiwan’s progress on democracy will ultimately be reflected in the electoral results, demonstrating the wisdom of the electorate.
Jane Ywe-hwan is an associate professor in National Pingtung University’s Department of Applied Japanese.
Translated by Hsieh Yi-ching
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s