Chinese language education in Taiwan, mired in a dispute over classical Chinese texts and content under curriculum guidelines, is stuck in the feudal, conservative ideas of classical Chinese, morals and discipline, which hinders the cultivation of a national Taiwanese character.
The difficulties of national reconstruction after Taiwan’s transition to democracy are rooted in how culture and cultivation of its national character is shackled. How Chinese is taught is the root of the problem, and a certain Chinese-language teacher embodies this impediment.
Language education is a process of character formation and morals, from elementary through high school, all major stages in which language and individual character are developed.
The feudal, conservative and dogmatic nature of classical Chinese grows more pronounced in this process, being most serious in high school.
Bias toward classical Chinese, morals and discipline held by Taipei First Girls’ High School literature teacher Alice Ou (區桂芝) reflects this problem.
In 1915, the New Culture Movement began in China, in which urban intellectuals advocated for vernacular over classical Chinese. Also called the Literary Revolution, its leading figures — Chen Duxiu (陳獨秀), Hu Shih (胡適) and Tsai Yuan-pei (蔡元培) — promoted Western concepts, including science and democracy.
In 1919, the movement entered a new stage: the May Fourth Movement, initiated by Chinese students protesting imperialism.
While the New Culture Movement was a cultural push to enlighten the masses, the May Fourth Movement was a political movement to protect China.
Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) saw the former as toadying to Western ideas; Mao Zedong (毛澤東) interpreted it as China’s bourgeois revolution against feudalism.
Chiang saw the May Fourth Movement as patriotic; Mao viewed it as a “new democracy.”
In 1949, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) toppled the Republic of China (ROC) led by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and established the People’s Republic of China (PRC).
Socialist and communist ideas and the unified culture formed in the New Cultural and May Fourth movements were key to the CCP’s takeover of China.
In 1945, Japan surrendered Taiwan to the Allied powers and the ROC’s KMT government retreated to Taiwan. The KMT-ROC government then became a government-in-exile and declared martial law, establishing authoritarian rule in Taiwan.
Politically, the KMT government used the Temporary Provisions Effective During the Period of National Mobilization for Suppression of the Communist Rebellion (動員戡亂時期臨時條款) legislation to suspend ROC citizens’ political freedoms. Culturally, the party-state and military brainwashed Taiwanese through education.
The KMT instilled Confucian thought and feudal ideas via Chinese literature and civic education, but never focused on literacy or the broader function of language. Teaching was a political tool.
In the 1960s, while China was undergoing the Cultural Revolution, the ROC government promoted the Chinese Cultural Renaissance Movement in Taiwan in opposition to the PRC. The ROC said it was to revive traditional Chinese culture, but it was essentially political propaganda.
In 1971, the PRC was recognized as China in the UN and replaced the ROC. The ROC government on Taiwan has remained mired in the ROC-PRC struggle, initially hoping to “recapture the mainland,” even after democracy was introduced to Taiwan.
Thus, slow or no progress has been made to build a national Taiwanese character due to the KMT’s authoritarian rule.
Ou seems unaware that the establishment of the PRC was led by its people’s support of pragmatism rooted in the two movements of the 1910s, while the ROC insisted on outdated formalism in classical Chinese texts.
Ou identifies the PRC as her motherland. She has no reason to criticize the ruling party in Taiwan, a democracy, as being shameless due to the reduction in the number of recommended classical texts. Her doing so is absurd.
She was even found fomenting anti-US and Japanese sentiment and promoting China’s potential annexation of Taiwan.
Does Ou not know it was the CCP that expelled the ROC, eliminated classical texts and denounced the literati?
Disputes over honesty and morality were born out of political implications. Ou’s intention is to confuse voters and help the CCP achieve its preferred outcome for Taiwan’s elections.
Lee Min-yung is a poet.
Translated by Hsieh Yi-ching
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
Taiwan is a small, humble place. There is no Eiffel Tower, no pyramids — no singular attraction that draws the world’s attention. If it makes headlines, it is because China wants to invade. Yet, those who find their way here by some twist of fate often fall in love. If you ask them why, some cite numbers showing it is one of the freest and safest countries in the world. Others talk about something harder to name: The quiet order of queues, the shared umbrellas for anyone caught in the rain, the way people stand so elderly riders can sit, the
After the coup in Burma in 2021, the country’s decades-long armed conflict escalated into a full-scale war. On one side was the Burmese army; large, well-equipped, and funded by China, supported with weapons, including airplanes and helicopters from China and Russia. On the other side were the pro-democracy forces, composed of countless small ethnic resistance armies. The military junta cut off electricity, phone and cell service, and the Internet in most of the country, leaving resistance forces isolated from the outside world and making it difficult for the various armies to coordinate with one another. Despite being severely outnumbered and
After the confrontation between US President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy on Friday last week, John Bolton, Trump’s former national security adviser, discussed this shocking event in an interview. Describing it as a disaster “not only for Ukraine, but also for the US,” Bolton added: “If I were in Taiwan, I would be very worried right now.” Indeed, Taiwanese have been observing — and discussing — this jarring clash as a foreboding signal. Pro-China commentators largely view it as further evidence that the US is an unreliable ally and that Taiwan would be better off integrating more deeply into
RSS