Japan is reeling from the powerful earthquake that struck the Noto Peninsula in Ishikawa Prefecture on Monday afternoon. Apart from tsunami warnings, the thing people most worried about when the quake hit was whether nearby nuclear power plants were safe. After all, if another disaster like the 2011 disaster at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant were to reoccur, the results would be unthinkable.
It is wise to learn from others’ experiences. Taiwan and Japan both lie along the Pacific Ring of Fire and face the same risk of tectonic plate dislocation, and are riddled with major and minor geological faults. In other words, the natural disasters that threaten Japanese nuclear power plants are equally applicable to Taiwan.
However, Japan is more than 10 times the size of Taiwan, so even in the case of the Fukushima nuclear disaster, residents of the region were able to disperse elsewhere. What about Taiwan? Taipei and New Taipei City have a combined population of nearly 10 million, most of whom live less than 30km from the two nuclear power plants located on the north coast. If they ever needed to evacuate, where would they go? In Taipei’s Neihu District (內湖) traffic is gridlocked at rush hour five days a week, so how could people leave if everyone tried escaping all at once?
Anyone who buys real-estate knows they should choose the location with care and try avoiding having nuclear facilities in their backyard. There is nothing unusual about Taipei property prices of more than NT$1 million (US$32,241) per ping (3.31m2). Goodness knows how many people’s life savings and wealth are tied up in their homes. If any more nuclear power plants are built in northern Taiwan, it would just increase the risk of property prices in the region being reduced to nothing overnight. Who could afford to take such a gamble?
If such a nuclear power plant were truly completely safe, as some people would have us believe, then why are top officials and the wealthy not willing to live next door to one? Why have mayors and county commissioners never scrambled to buy such property? You do not need to be an expert — common sense would tell you why, and it would also tell you why Taiwan is in no position to build any more plants.
Huang Wei-ping works in public service and has a master’s degree from the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University in the US.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s