On Monday, the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) vice presidential candidate, former representative to the US Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴), attended the televised debate with her Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) counterparts, Broadcasting Corp of China chairman Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康) and Legislator Cynthia Wu (吳欣盈) respectively.
Hsiao enumerated several reforms implemented by the government and vowed to keep the progress going.
Hsiao began with the government’s economic accomplishments, saying that by distributing stimulus vouchers during the COVID-19 pandemic, increasing the budget for public infrastructure by 30 percent and enabling Taiwan to surpass South Korea in its GDP per capita, the DPP has proven itself more capable of fulfilling people’s needs than the previous KMT administration.
She voiced apprehension about the opposition parties’ plans to promote deeper trade cooperation with China, saying that it would ultimately jeopardize Taiwan’s credibility in the global market and its economic autonomy.
Hsiao approved of President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) endeavor to tackle transnational challenges regarding climate crises and the dissemination of disinformation.
Since Tsai assumed office in 2016, the government has expanded the Global Cooperation Training Framework program with the US, Japan and Australia, and deepened joint cooperation with the three nations to advance cybersecurity and climate resilience, she said.
The next president and vice president need to respond prudently to the volatile global situation, she added.
During the second phase of the debate, Hsiao promised to continue providing the military with sufficient equipment, proposing to expedite the domestic manufacture of weapons, procuring more foreign equipment and modernizing training content.
The most practical way to ensure peace is to bolster our armed forces, she said, adding that long-lasting regional stability can only be preserved through enhancing deterrence along with allied nations.
In the last session, Hsiao condemned the KMT for undermining national unity and blaming the DPP for cross-strait tension, and for echoing Beijing’s rhetoric at the expense of Taiwanese. She underlined the importance of national cohesion and urged all political parties to put differences aside and stand with the government in the face of external threats to avoid a military escalation.
Hsiao encouraged people to support her and the DPP’s presidential candidate, Vice President William Lai (賴清德), and vowed to continue to let Taiwan shine on the world stage.
She also acknowledged that there are still issues that the DPP has not yet adequately resolved, but with the achievements of the past eight years and the exhaustive policy blueprint she and Lai have presented, she appealed to undecided voters to give the party another four years to allow it to accelerate ongoing policies.
The performance of the vice presidential candidates at the debate has received considerable public scrutiny. Although they do not present their own policy proposals and are widely deemed to be auxiliary figures to their running mates, their reputations and remarks can still significantly affect support for their ticket, so it is crucial that they maintain a positive image in the final days of campaigning.
Tshua Siu-ui is a Taiwanese student studying international relations and politics in Norwich, England.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
After the coup in Burma in 2021, the country’s decades-long armed conflict escalated into a full-scale war. On one side was the Burmese army; large, well-equipped, and funded by China, supported with weapons, including airplanes and helicopters from China and Russia. On the other side were the pro-democracy forces, composed of countless small ethnic resistance armies. The military junta cut off electricity, phone and cell service, and the Internet in most of the country, leaving resistance forces isolated from the outside world and making it difficult for the various armies to coordinate with one another. Despite being severely outnumbered and
RSS