As the US presidential election is scheduled to take place in November next year, the Republican Party has begun its series of primaries. Three decades ago, candidates locked horns over issues like balancing the budget, the legalization of abortion, gun control and racism. Decades later, these issues still come up on the agenda, meaning that the problems have not been satisfactorily addressed. A new issue has been added to this year’s election, with both the Democratic Party and Republican Party agreeing on its core outline, that of countering China. The US presidential election is about choosing a candidate who can keep the nation in place as the world’s predominant superpower.
In contrast, aside from the foreign policy issue concerning Taiwanese independence or Chinese unification, Taiwan’s Jan. 13 election campaign has seen the copious and all too usual mudslinging against candidates. The question about Taiwan’s status has always concerned people’s ideology and values. Those who are familiar with history would know that when the Constitution was first promulgated, the territory included both China and Taiwan. However, in the intervening period after the Chinese Civil War, with the victory of former Chinese leader Mao Zedong (毛澤東) and defeat of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), China naturally “vanished” from its place in the Constitution, with Chiang keen to keep inciting his people to launch a counteroffensive to reclaim the lost territory and recover China.
Since 1949, the territory outlined in the Constitution has been Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu. Similar to the Mexican-American War of 1846 to 1848, in which Mexico ceded a large tract of its territory after defeat — 55 percent to be more precise — which included the present-day US states of California, Nevada, Utah, New Mexico, most of Arizona and Colorado, and parts of Oklahoma, Kansas and Wyoming. Like Taiwan, Mexico could no longer lay claim to the lost territory as its own.
Some people are of the view that changing the name of the nation would be an act of pushing for Taiwanese independence. However, for the government of the People’s Republic of China (PRC), whether under the name of the Republic of China (ROC) or Taiwan, as long as Taiwan is de facto separated from the PRC and is not subordinate to it, then it is already a form of independence. From the time of former Chinese leader Jiang Zemin (江澤民) up to the present day under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), Beijing seethes at Taiwan holds presidential elections.
Former president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) used to say that people who identify either with the ROC or Taiwan should embrace each other so that China would not be able to sow discord and that Taiwan should adopt a pro-US policy. Jan. 13 happens to mark the 36th anniversary of his death. His stance rings true and is worthy of being remembered.
This year’s election should be focused on the following issues:
First, how to elevate people’s sense of national identity, so that fewer people identify with the aggressor, China, as their homeland.
Second, how to increase public investment and bolster economic development, for example, by developing plans to extend the high speed rail network around Taiwan proper, including Yilan, Hualien, Taitung and Pingtung.
Third, how to facilitate judicial reform and improve the quality of prosecutors, lawyers and judges so that people can have greater trust in their judicial system. These issues are of greater significance and importance and should be discussed in the campaign, instead of the unfocused public discussion we see now, engulfed in personal attacks, fake polls and fake news.
Chuang Sheng-rong is a lawyer.
Translated by Rita Wang
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS