Humans are capable of doing incredible things. From building train tunnels underneath the sea to enormous offshore wind farms, it is inspiring what we could achieve with the right skills and money. Keep that in mind, because we need to do many more incredible things in a very short period of time if we want a shot at addressing climate change and crafting a better future for our planet.
When we talk about the great green economic transformation, we often miss a piece of the puzzle: human capacity. Yes, financing renewables is vital, but without training, who would be able to make it all work? The transition away from fossil fuels, as agreed at the most recent UN COP climate summit, creates opportunities for economic development and job creation. However, we must not forget that people need to gain the right skills — from elementary math to specialist technical knowledge — before taking on green roles.
The situation on this front is dire. About 69 percent of people aged 16 to 24 globally lack secondary education-level skills. Without those basic literacy and numeracy skills, these people would find it difficult — if not impossible — to play a role in the transition. Basic education is also one of the best ways to create resilience.
Illustration: Kevin Sheu
This is especially acute in low and middle-income countries, where young people and women are more likely to be unskilled, unemployed or in unstable work. However, it is an issue everywhere: LinkedIn’s Global Green Skills report found that while green job postings are up by 15 percent year-on-year, the supply of suitably equipped workers just is not there.
This is a justice issue. As skills change, there is a risk that more people get left behind and without economic opportunities. Yet it would also affect the transition itself.
Liesbet Steer, president and CEO of the global nonprofit Education Development Center (EDC), said that scarce labor drives up costs. Without a plentiful supply of well-trained workers, the transition would not only be slower, but far more expensive.
The backlash against climate policies would likely also be reduced if people understood what it meant for jobs and were able to access those opportunities.
Take Dutch farmers, who have been protesting for months against agricultural reforms that might require them to shut down or reduce the size of their farms. They formed a political party in 2019 to push back against such policies, which are aimed at reducing nitrogen and ammonia pollution. Without retraining — to give them skills to reduce the environmental impact of their farms or to help them change careers — it is only natural that they would feel resentful. What happened in the Netherlands might become a pattern if education and training are not tackled as key elements of the transition.
It would help if people received fundamental climate change information, but that also seems to be lagging behind. A UNESCO analysis of education curricula from 100 countries shows that only 53 percent make any reference to climate change and, when the subject is mentioned, it is almost always given low priority.
Anna Bagwell, a student leader on the Youth Climate Advocacy Committee run by Phipps Conservatory in Pittsburgh, said that most students who come through the program report getting their climate knowledge from online sources. It was only in July that the state of Connecticut mandated climate-change studies across its public schools as part of its science curriculum — and it is one of a handful of US states to do so.
Steer says that education and training are still seen by the climate sector as someone else’s responsibility rather than an integral part of the solution. While two-thirds of climate action plans laid out by 2015 Paris Agreement signatories recognize the importance of skills development, only 40 percent have an implementation plan. Even fewer mention climate-change education.
The global stocktake, the landmark deal delivered at COP28, does reflect an increased focus on capacity building. However, as Steer says, “the devil is in the details.” Skills development is only mentioned briefly, with no reference to training or education. Action for Climate Empowerment — the tract of negotiations that covers education and training — failed to reach an agreement during the summit, so talks are to resume in Bonn, Germany, next summer.
Meanwhile, the Alliance of CEO Climate Leaders published an open letter ahead of COP28. Signed by 108 business leaders from companies including Deutsche Bank AG and Sony Group Corp, it calls for regulatory change and new investment, but says nothing about skills or education. That feels odd considering labor shortages are already being cited as one of the main challenges firms are facing in sectors such as construction, manufacturing and technology.
As we move into a new year, there much greater weight needs to be placed on reskilling and upskilling entire labor forces. Political and business leaders ought to work together on providing retraining opportunities for adults in jobs that are being or would be disrupted, and they must make sure that information about new opportunities is properly shared throughout communities.
For example, research by the EDC identified more than 270 different occupations in the fastest-growing green and blue sectors in developing countries: renewable energy, green construction, waste management, tourism and hospitality, and sustainable agriculture and forestry. However, in speaking to training providers, local governments and jobseekers, researchers found few were even aware of these opportunities.
We also should not forget the youngest and most marginalized members of society. The Global Education Monitoring Report estimates that there would be an average annual financing gap of US$97 billion between this year and 2030 in low and low-middle-income countries for achieving universal pre-primary, primary and secondary education by the dawn of the next decade. This needs to be addressed.
After all, when humans built the pyramids, the Empire State Building or any of the other monuments to human capacity, they probably started with the foundations.
Lara Williams is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering climate change. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS