Last month, popular Taiwanese band Mayday (五月天) held concerts in China, soon followed by allegations that the band lip-synched during their performances. At first, only self-published media raised the issue, but later the Shanghai Municipal Administration of Culture and Tourism investigated it. Then, Chinese state-affiliated media including Xinhua news agency, the People’s Daily and Procuratorial Daily brought it to public attention. Then, China’s Taiwan Affairs Office at a news conference implied that the band should not have set a bad example.
The reason for such an unprecedented investigation by Chinese officials has just become clear. In a Reuters report, two Taiwanese security officials said that the campaign was led by the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) Publicity Department to “sway the youth vote” ahead of the presidential and legislative elections on Jan. 13.
Taiwanese intelligence officials said that the Chinese National Radio and Television Administration pressured Mayday to state that Taiwan is a part of China.
The Mayday incident became public less than 20 days before the elections, a reminder of what happened in 2016 to the Taiwanese member of the South Korean pop band Twice, Chou Tzu-yu (周子瑜). In 2016, Chou briefly displayed a Republic of China (ROC) flag on a TV show. Following that, she was banned by a number of programs and her endorsement deals were canceled. Under great pressure, Chou was compelled to recognize the “one China” policy and the so-called “1992 consensus.”
Chou was then framed as a singer who supports Taiwanese independence, and now Mayday has been forced to make a political statement. It is obvious that China is attempting to interfere with the elections. When Mayday did not comply and declare a “one China” stance, the band was accused of lip-synching.
The allegations are unfounded. The CCP treats singers and artists like those in feudal times, while oppressing and manipulating artists who believe in creative freedom.
In addition to Mayday and Chou, Taiwanese pop singers such as Jolin Tsai (蔡依林), Hebe Tian (田馥甄), Lala Hsu (徐佳瑩) and Deserts Chang (張懸) have been labeled “pro-Taiwanese independence” for absurd reasons, and they have been severely criticized by young, jingoistic “little pink” Chinese nationalists on the Internet. Beijing regards anything that goes against Chinese propaganda about its claimed sovereignty as pro-Taiwanese independence. Any singer or artist unwilling to cooperate are subject to attacks on the Internet, and their performance contracts and endorsement deals might be terminated.
The Mayday incident shows how easily people could be suppressed by China’s state apparatus. Nowadays, Beijing does not even have to come up with any excuse to interfere with the elections. It has been trying to push Taiwan into the “one China” trap.
It is not Mayday that has lip-synched. The Chinese government has been lip-synching the songs of “both sides of the Strait are one family” and “taking good care of the Taiwanese” for years. Beijing wants to force singers and artists from Taiwan to perform in accordance with its propaganda, but it will never succeed. Taiwanese singers will never include “1992 consensus” or “one China across the Strait” in their lyrics.
With the ballots in their hands, Taiwanese are to prove again to China that they will never surrender and be subjugated. It is impossible for Taiwanese to abandon democracy and freedom while embracing autocratic China. As Mayday’s lyrics go: “You are what you believe, your insistence makes you what you are.”
Jethro Wang works as a research assistant for a think tank.
Translated by Emma Liu
Labubu, an elf-like plush toy with pointy ears and nine serrated teeth, has become a global sensation, worn by celebrities including Rihanna and Dua Lipa. These dolls are sold out in stores from Singapore to London; a human-sized version recently fetched a whopping US$150,000 at an auction in Beijing. With all the social media buzz, it is worth asking if we are witnessing the rise of a new-age collectible, or whether Labubu is a mere fad destined to fade. Investors certainly want to know. Pop Mart International Group Ltd, the Chinese manufacturer behind this trendy toy, has rallied 178 percent
My youngest son attends a university in Taipei. Throughout the past two years, whenever I have brought him his luggage or picked him up for the end of a semester or the start of a break, I have stayed at a hotel near his campus. In doing so, I have noticed a strange phenomenon: The hotel’s TV contained an unusual number of Chinese channels, filled with accents that would make a person feel as if they are in China. It is quite exhausting. A few days ago, while staying in the hotel, I found that of the 50 available TV channels,
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
There is no such thing as a “silicon shield.” This trope has gained traction in the world of Taiwanese news, likely with the best intentions. Anything that breaks the China-controlled narrative that Taiwan is doomed to be conquered is welcome, but after observing its rise in recent months, I now believe that the “silicon shield” is a myth — one that is ultimately working against Taiwan. The basic silicon shield idea is that the world, particularly the US, would rush to defend Taiwan against a Chinese invasion because they do not want Beijing to seize the nation’s vital and unique chip industry. However,
RSS