With generational differences and partisan loyalties in the pan-blue and pan-green camps, the three main parties — the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) — remain close in polls running up to the presidential and legislative elections.
They need to consider how they could attract support from minority groups outside of their established voter bases.
Hong Kong celebrity Chapman To (杜汶澤) is to vote in Taiwan for the first time after receiving his national identification card. He is just one of many Hong Kongers who have immigrated to Taiwan over the past few years.
There are about 590,000 “new immigrants” — 300,000 of whom have the right to vote. Many are parents, with the number of children reaching as many as 450,000; they are sure to be on the lookout for a better future for their kids.
There are 1,028,000 first-time voters considered to be in minority groups between the ages of 20 and 24, with 580,000 being indigenous people who are largely forgotten by politicians; 5 percent of the population identifying as non-heterosexual; residents of eastern Taiwan, as well as those living on outlying islands, all of whom could have a major impact on election results as significant minority voter groups.
However, on issues and policies related to minorities, all major parties, whether they are the governing majority or the opposition, still have much room to improve. Nominating indigenous legislators and legislator-at-large slots or new immigrants is little more than window dressing. Similarly, legacy media and online commentators rarely have a handle on the political preferences of minority groups.
How to win support from new immigrants and indigenous people, whose voices are usually neglected, as well as first-time swing voters, often escapes the minds of campaign staffers. What is worse, when the KMT, DPP and TPP struggle to devise appropriate political policies or have anything to show regarding minorities, they only obfuscate and accuse their rivals of not doing enough for these underrepresented groups.
Minorities were not seen as important in the past three transfers of political power. Ethnic ties, factions and generational differences were the main factors keeping younger generations and minorities outside of politics.
Even within these different groups, we see established patterns of political loyalty. Hong Kongers who relocated to Taiwan and LGBTQ+ groups tend to be pro-green, residents of outlying islands and rural areas are generally pro-blue and the children of new immigrants tend to be pro-TPP.
The majority and mainstream media find it hard to convince minorities to join their side. Taking advantage of concurrent social network promotion and on-the-ground activities is a good way to achieve this, but how to convert this into votes is the real challenge.
Due to their different stances on gender equality, the KMT’s presidential candidate, New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), and TPP Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) did not attend Kaohsiung Pride.
The DPP’s presidential candidate, Vice President William Lai (賴清德), who lacks supporters in Kinmen County could only stand back and watch blue camp figures advocate for peace on the anniversary of the 823 Artillery Bombardment. Lai and his running mate, former representative to the US Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴), do not see the outlying islands as fertile ground for garnering support.
As examples of targeted policies, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) won the 2020 presidential election due to younger voters, while former Kaohsiung mayor Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) won the local election by calling on Kaohsiung residents working in northern Taiwan to return to vote.
In next month’s elections, how to persuade minorities to vote for you instead of your opponent will be crucial.
Jet Yang is editor-in-chief of Knowing Media Group.
Translated by Chien Yan-ru
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS