In Japanese academic Yoshiyuki Ogasawara’s book On the Taiwanese Presidential Election (台灣總統大選-台灣認同的成長與爭奪), he made a careful analysis of the past seven presidential elections by categorizing Taiwanese voters into three groups: The first endorses Chinese nationalism; the second, Taiwanese nationalism; and the last, a Taiwanese identity. The difference between the latter two is that voters in the last might value Taiwan’s sovereignty, but consider themselves both Taiwanese and Chinese, and usually support maintaining the “status quo” while developing an inclination for Taiwan’s democratic system.
Ogasawara’s theory states that no matter if it is the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) or the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), when either party takes a Chinese nationalism or Taiwanese nationalism stance, that party loses the presidential election. The results of every presidential election since 1996 have long rested on the third group’s endorsement.
During the Third Taiwan Strait Crisis in 1996, former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) marginalized his rivals — Peng Ming-min (彭明敏) of the DPP and independent Lin Yang-kang (林洋港) — who respectively represented Taiwanese nationalism and Chinese nationalism, and maximized support from the group favoring a Taiwanese identity. In 2000, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) triumphed and secured a second term with his “New Middle Way” (新中間路線), a policy that promised to transcend Taiwanese independence and Chinese unification. The DPP’s replacement of the “Taiwan Independence Clause” (台獨黨綱) with the “Resolution on Taiwan’s Future” in 1999 also helped. In 2012, former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) won with the so-called “1992 consensus,” the difference being that the consensus was based on the principle of “one China, different interpretations.”
President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) two consecutive victories were also closely associated with the group. The Sunflower movement in 2014 unleashed a political tidal wave that reshaped the political landscape. Tsai’s vow to push back against a KMT pivot toward China and the cross-strait service trade agreement saw her elected. In 2020, following China’s crackdown on Hong Kong’s pro-democracy demonstrations, as well as former Kaohsiung mayor Han Kuo-yu’s (韓國瑜) “China-friendly” cross-strait stance and mocking of the DPP’s “sense of the nation’s impending doom” turned the tide in Tsai’s favor when she vowed again to maintain the “status quo.”
Yet in terms of next month’s elections, the cross-strait policy of past elections has been sidelined, with only the KMT appealing to voters that the election is a choice between “war or peace.”
Since all three candidates are benshengren (本省人) — people who came to Taiwan before World War II and their offspring — who vow to maintain the “status quo,” the DPP has no edge or “material” to work with as before, complicating predictions on who would win the last group’s support this time, Ogasawara said.
Instead of cross-strait trade, public discourse has centered on private property — DPP presidential candidate Vice President William Lai’s (賴清德) old family home, TPP Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je’s (柯文哲) Hsinchu County farmland and KMT presidential candidate and New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi’s (侯友宜) Kaisuan Condominium.
Vetted as a rising star of the DPP, Lai was renowned for his rectitude, uprightness and integrity ever since entering politics 30 years ago. As his rivals fail to dig up dirt on him, the only “fault” they could find seems to be the old family home they claim is an “illegal structure.” However, compared to Lai’s old family house, valued at less than NT$1 million (US$32,554), Hou’s Kaisuan Condominium and Ko’s “farmland” have been more damaging.
It is strange that a presidential election to determine cross-strait relations would center on private property. This is due to voter fatigue on cross-strait issues, and because of Lai’s clean past and upright character.
Russian President Vladimir Putin’s hypersonic missile carried a simple message to the West over Ukraine: Back off, and if you do not, Russia reserves the right to hit US and British military facilities. Russia fired a new intermediate-range hypersonic ballistic missile known as “Oreshnik,” or Hazel Tree, at Ukraine on Thursday in what Putin said was a direct response to strikes on Russia by Ukrainian forces with US and British missiles. In a special statement from the Kremlin just after 8pm in Moscow that day, the Russian president said the war was escalating toward a global conflict, although he avoided any nuclear
Would China attack Taiwan during the American lame duck period? For months, there have been worries that Beijing would seek to take advantage of an American president slowed by age and a potentially chaotic transition to make a move on Taiwan. In the wake of an American election that ended without drama, that far-fetched scenario will likely prove purely hypothetical. But there is a crisis brewing elsewhere in Asia — one with which US president-elect Donald Trump may have to deal during his first days in office. Tensions between the Philippines and China in the South China Sea have been at
US President-elect Donald Trump has been declaring his personnel picks for his incoming Cabinet. Many are staunchly opposed to China. South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem, Trump’s nomination to be his next secretary of the US Department of Homeland Security, said that since 2000, China has had a long-term plan to destroy the US. US Representative Mike Waltz, nominated by Trump to be national security adviser, has stated that the US is engaged in a cold war with China, and has criticized Canada as being weak on Beijing. Even more vocal and unequivocal than these two Cabinet picks is Trump’s nomination for
An article written by Uber Eats Taiwan general manager Chai Lee (李佳穎) published in the Liberty Times (sister paper of the Taipei Times) on Tuesday said that Uber Eats promises to engage in negotiations to create a “win-win” situation. The article asserted that Uber Eats’ acquisition of Foodpanda would bring about better results for Taiwan. The National Delivery Industrial Union (NDIU), a trade union for food couriers in Taiwan, would like to express its doubts about and dissatisfaction with Lee’s article — if Uber Eats truly has a clear plan, why has this so-called plan not been presented at relevant