It is patriotism when love of your own people comes first; it is nationalism when hate for people other than your own comes first. That definition comes from Charles de Gaulle, a former national hero and president of France.
It is worth keeping in mind with a presidential election in the US next year, the most consequential country of many where these two deceptively similar and yet utterly contrary forces will clash.
De Gaulle was onto something subtle, but big. Patriotism, when you observe that warm feeling welling up inside of you, is fundamentally positive. By contrast, nationalism, whenever you perceive that emotion in you — and we all do on occasion — is negative and potentially jingoistic.
Illustration: Mountain People
Political scientists describe this distinction as “inclusive” patriotism versus “exclusive” nationalism. In Biblical terms, the Book of Ruth — in which the Israelites embrace a Moabite woman as one of their own — is patriotic; other parts, such as Deuteronomy 25:17-19 — in which the Lord tells the Israelites to blot out the memory of Amalek from under heaven — are nationalistic.
Nationalism, unlike patriotism, needs an “other” as a target of its primary energy source, which is not pride, but resentment. That “other” can be foreign or domestic. In the past as today, the role has often fallen to outside foes, but also, say, to immigrants, Jews or political enemies at home.
So it is not patriotic, but nationalistic to extol a “real America,” with the implication of an unworthy and “unreal” alternative, and it is vile to claim — as former US president Donald Trump, a self-declared nationalist who is running for a second term, recently did — that illegal immigrants are “poisoning the blood of our country.”
George Orwell concluded that nationalism was “inseparable from the desire for power,” even at the cost of obsession and self-deception. Patriotism, by contrast, is as likely to be cooperative as combative. After all, patriots want their country to thrive, which is best done in harmony with other people, whether those are domestic groups or foreign countries, whose trade and investment can make your own nation wealthier, for example.
That is why the world’s pre-eminent multilateral forum is called the UN — not, say, the World Union — a nuance that eludes nationalists who disdain the UN as a talking shop for “globalists.”
As different as they are, though, patriotism and nationalism easily become conflated. I have thought a lot about that phenomenon, because as a dual citizen of the US and Germany, I have encountered the different ways in which my two countries confuse the concepts.
Post-World War II West Germany accepted that the Third Reich’s hyper-nationalism — the “Naz” in Nazism — was evil and had caused nothing but suffering, genocide and destruction. The reborn country therefore aspired to be “post-national,” atoning for its past and aspiring to a higher — supranational and therefore European — identity.
However, along the way, the West Germans confused their new post-nationalism with anti-patriotism. Waving or even showing flags was rare and frowned upon, as was singing the anthem in sports stadiums. Soldiers of the Bundeswehr were spat on in the streets when wearing uniforms around town. The turning point only came as late as 2006, when Germany hosted the FIFA World Cup. Germany placed third in that tournament, but set psycho-emotional records in the joyful — and ebulliently inclusive — celebration of their own team and flag alongside those from across the world.
My other country, the US, is in the opposite default state. There, flags flutter everywhere, from houses to cars and clothes; the anthem is played at almost every high-school game, and most people not only stand for it, but place their hands on their hearts. When pilots learn that a soldier is on their flight, they announce it to the cabin, which erupts in applause and cheering.
The post-nationalist anti-patriotism of West Germany was neither healthy nor sustainable. Too many Germans could not maintain the rituals of national shame. In a psychological ricochet, some became susceptible to a new nationalism, which today manifests in the record popularity of a far-right and xenophobic political party called the Alternative for Germany, which polls at about 20 percent.
By contrast, the genuine patriotism of the US, too, easily becomes contaminated with a messianic exceptionalism that tempts Americans to ignore or gloss over the dark chapters in their history.
Even if the narrative of liberty dominates, the truth also includes mass enslavement, ethnic cleansing of indigenous people and episodes of “otherization,” such as the Chinese Exclusion Act of the late 19th century and the internment of Japanese-Americans during World War II — and of course the racism that many Americans of color still encounter in everyday life.
A patriotic culture that is selectively and deliberately blind to reality can turn into nationalism, such as the white or Christian variants increasingly in vogue on the American right.
The tension between patriotism and nationalism is also playing out across much of the world. In Poland, a nationalist party has for years been stoking resentment at Brussels, Germany, Russia and LGBTQ+ people, but has now been replaced by a patriotic government that wants to make Poland inclusive and open again to the world.
In next-door Hungary, a hyper-nationalist prime minister, Viktor Orban, vilifies domestic “others” while provoking neighboring countries with maps of “greater Hungary” that include chunks of Ukraine, Romania, Slovakia and Serbia. Nationalism is also on the rise from Turkey and India to China and beyond.
Owing to its global stature, though, the US is more likely than any other country to bend the arc of history. Voters in the primaries, and then in the general election, will incessantly hear both kinds of entreaty in the coming months, the nationalist and the patriotic.
Some candidates will pander to voters’ resentments. Others will appeal to ideals such as truth, civility and tolerance. Some will postulate American decline and promise renewed greatness. Others will celebrate the greatness of the US as it is. Some will demand loyalty to themselves and their group. Others will ask for loyalty to the republic and its constitution. All will drape themselves in red, white and blue.
However, some will be nationalists, others patriots. And then, come November, just one of them will win.
Andreas Kluth is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering US diplomacy, national security and geopolitics. Previously, he was editor-in-chief of the Handelsblatt Global and a writer for The Economist.
Russian President Vladimir Putin’s hypersonic missile carried a simple message to the West over Ukraine: Back off, and if you do not, Russia reserves the right to hit US and British military facilities. Russia fired a new intermediate-range hypersonic ballistic missile known as “Oreshnik,” or Hazel Tree, at Ukraine on Thursday in what Putin said was a direct response to strikes on Russia by Ukrainian forces with US and British missiles. In a special statement from the Kremlin just after 8pm in Moscow that day, the Russian president said the war was escalating toward a global conflict, although he avoided any nuclear
Would China attack Taiwan during the American lame duck period? For months, there have been worries that Beijing would seek to take advantage of an American president slowed by age and a potentially chaotic transition to make a move on Taiwan. In the wake of an American election that ended without drama, that far-fetched scenario will likely prove purely hypothetical. But there is a crisis brewing elsewhere in Asia — one with which US president-elect Donald Trump may have to deal during his first days in office. Tensions between the Philippines and China in the South China Sea have been at
US President-elect Donald Trump has been declaring his personnel picks for his incoming Cabinet. Many are staunchly opposed to China. South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem, Trump’s nomination to be his next secretary of the US Department of Homeland Security, said that since 2000, China has had a long-term plan to destroy the US. US Representative Mike Waltz, nominated by Trump to be national security adviser, has stated that the US is engaged in a cold war with China, and has criticized Canada as being weak on Beijing. Even more vocal and unequivocal than these two Cabinet picks is Trump’s nomination for
An article written by Uber Eats Taiwan general manager Chai Lee (李佳穎) published in the Liberty Times (sister paper of the Taipei Times) on Tuesday said that Uber Eats promises to engage in negotiations to create a “win-win” situation. The article asserted that Uber Eats’ acquisition of Foodpanda would bring about better results for Taiwan. The National Delivery Industrial Union (NDIU), a trade union for food couriers in Taiwan, would like to express its doubts about and dissatisfaction with Lee’s article — if Uber Eats truly has a clear plan, why has this so-called plan not been presented at relevant
RSS