Beijing’s “one China” principle is a legalized political propaganda attempt aimed to facilitate the annexation of Taiwan, by suggesting that the issue of Taiwan is a “domestic matter,” thereby preventing the US and Japan from interventing in the event of a cross-strait conflict. This begs the question: Is it true that Taiwan belongs to China as claimed by the “one China” principle?
Since the principle of sovereignty, which is the supreme authority within a territory, is pivotal in modern international law, one first needs to establish which international law the “one China” principle is based on.
Last year’s white paper “The Taiwan Question and China’s Unification in the New Era” published by the Chinese government states that in September 1945, Japan signed the Japanese Instrument of Surrender and vowed “to carry out the provisions of the Potsdam Declaration in good faith,” which is to return Taiwan and the Penghu islands to China as outlined in the Cairo Declaration.
On Oct. 25, 1945, the Republic of China (ROC) government announced that it had “resumed its jurisdiction over Taiwan.” According to this logic, China had recovered Taiwan de jure and de facto through a host of international legal documents. As a result, the interpretation that “Japan returned Taiwan and the Penghu islands to China in 1945” is the legal foundation for Beijing’s “one China” principle.
However, as the ROC government had not signed any documents of formal cession, it is void for it to unilaterally proclaim jurisdiction over Taiwan. Japan did not cede Taiwan and the Penghu islands to the ROC or the People’s Republic of China, it renounced all right, title and claim to Taiwan and the Penghu islands, which was dictated in the Treaty of San Francisco signed on April 28, 1952.
Due to this, the “one China” principle does not have any legal basis and therefore the contention that “Taiwan is part of China” is entirely false.
However, to obstruct Japan’s intervention in cross-strait issues, Beijing has consistently attempted to brainwash Japan with its “one China” principle. Consequently, the “Taiwan issue is a domestic problem” is deeply rooted in the Japanese mind, as part of China’s cognitive warfare against Japan.
Japan’s Asahi Shimbun, with its pro-China stance, published a report on Thursday last week analyzing relations between Taiwan and China. In the report, there was a sentence: “After Japan surrendered, China recovered Taiwan.”
I wrote to the Asahi Shimbun asking for a correction, but have yet to receive a reply.
I suspect that there are pro-China elements within the Asahi Shimbun. Unfortunately, many Japanese are under the long-term influence of Chinese propaganda, which makes them prone to accepting these false reports.
I hope the Taiwanese government and its people can understand how influential and dominant Chinese propaganda is within the international community. Taiwanese should also stiffen their sinews and condemn China for continuing its one-sided claim to Taiwan through the “one China” principle, so that other nations know that China and Taiwan are not the same country in accordance with international law.
Above all, Taiwanese should not vote for a presidential candidate who is in favor of the “one China” principle in next month’s election.
Hideki Nagayama is chairman of the Taiwan Research Forum.
Translated by Rita Wang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS