Election day mischief
A supporter of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) recently applied to use the area around the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) Taipei headquarters on Beiping E Road on election day, Jan. 13.
The campaign office of DPP presidential candidate Vice President William Lai (賴清德) is also there. The Taipei City Police Department’s Zhongzheng First Precinct rejected the supporter’s application to avoid potential conflict.
In response, TPP Taipei City Councilor Chen You-cheng (陳宥丞) complained to Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安), arguing that people’s right to public property should not be impeded.
TPP legislator-at-large nominee Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) also said that people’s right to freedom of assembly — which is protected by the Constitution — should not be infringed upon.
On election day, supporters usually gather at the headquarters of a political party to await the results. This is especially the case for presidential and legislative elections. It is difficult to estimate the number of supporters planning to gather at headquarters, and it is common for crowds to swarm into the streets in front of or around a party’s headquarters on election day.
What exactly is the intention behind the TPP supporter’s application to use the area in front of Lai’s campaign office on election day? Is it legitimate?
Although the right of access to public property and freedom of assembly are protected by the Constitution, they should be restricted moderately.
If an application does not concern the public interest, is harmful to social order or might cause trouble to society, of course it should be restricted.
The application of a supporter of TPP presidential candidate and Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) for access to the area in front of Lai’s campaign office clearly lacks legitimacy. It is unreasonable and unnecessary to use that area on election day.
Ko’s fan is clearly a troublemaker. The application should be rejected, and the precinct did the right thing after weighing the pros and cons.
Chi An-hsiu
Taipei
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS