Election day mischief
A supporter of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) recently applied to use the area around the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) Taipei headquarters on Beiping E Road on election day, Jan. 13.
The campaign office of DPP presidential candidate Vice President William Lai (賴清德) is also there. The Taipei City Police Department’s Zhongzheng First Precinct rejected the supporter’s application to avoid potential conflict.
In response, TPP Taipei City Councilor Chen You-cheng (陳宥丞) complained to Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安), arguing that people’s right to public property should not be impeded.
TPP legislator-at-large nominee Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) also said that people’s right to freedom of assembly — which is protected by the Constitution — should not be infringed upon.
On election day, supporters usually gather at the headquarters of a political party to await the results. This is especially the case for presidential and legislative elections. It is difficult to estimate the number of supporters planning to gather at headquarters, and it is common for crowds to swarm into the streets in front of or around a party’s headquarters on election day.
What exactly is the intention behind the TPP supporter’s application to use the area in front of Lai’s campaign office on election day? Is it legitimate?
Although the right of access to public property and freedom of assembly are protected by the Constitution, they should be restricted moderately.
If an application does not concern the public interest, is harmful to social order or might cause trouble to society, of course it should be restricted.
The application of a supporter of TPP presidential candidate and Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) for access to the area in front of Lai’s campaign office clearly lacks legitimacy. It is unreasonable and unnecessary to use that area on election day.
Ko’s fan is clearly a troublemaker. The application should be rejected, and the precinct did the right thing after weighing the pros and cons.
Chi An-hsiu
Taipei
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s