The Asian Corporate Governance Association (ACGA) on Dec. 13 released its latest Corporate Governance Watch report, which ranked Taiwan third alongside Singapore among 12 Asia-Pacific markets this year, trailing only Australia and Japan. Taiwan moved up one notch from the previous rankings released in 2020, with its total score rising 0.6 points to 62.8, the nation’s highest.
In what has been the biggest shakeup to the rankings since the association began compiling the reports in 2003, Japan climbed from fifth place in 2020 to second this year, while Hong Kong dropped from second to sixth.
Other markets that gained ground include India, moving up to sixth place alongside Hong Kong, and South Korea climbing one place to eighth. Thailand fell one spot to ninth, while China, the Philippines and Indonesia remained unchanged at the bottom in 10th, 11th and 12th place respectively.
Corporate governance, the standards of conduct and procedures for managing a firm, provides the legal framework for efficient operations and is crucial for companies to raise their competitiveness and maximize shareholder value. Well-designed corporate governance creates a robust environment for companies to flourish and pursue sustainable development.
This year’s report covers seven categories: governance and public governance, regulators, corporate governance rules, listed companies, investors, auditors and audit regulators, and civil society and media.
Taiwan ranked second in three categories — governance and public governance, regulators and auditors and audit regulators. It also showed significant progress in corporate governance rules, which the ACGA attributed to Taiwan in 2021 setting up a new commercial court to handle corporate and securities-related disputes, as well as this year lowering the threshold for reporting substantial shareholding from 10 percent to 5 percent.
The association also praised Taiwan for revising its corporate governance blueprints after the Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC) initiated a corporate governance strategy in 2013, including last year launching the Sustainable Development Road Map for Taiwan Stock Exchange and Taipei Exchange-listed companies and this year’s “action plans.”
However, Taiwan scored relatively low in the investors, and civil society and media categories. In the former, Taiwan collected only 40 points compared with Australia’s 69, while in civil society and media, it scored 62 points to Australia’s 82.
The FSC attributed Taiwan’s low score in the investors category to weak engagement by institutional investors with companies compared with other markets. The commission also said that Taiwan’s lackluster performance in civil society and media showed it had room to improve, such as by promoting the effectiveness of corporate governance or reporting and explaining corporate scandals.
It is not that the local media have not performed their duty to monitor publicly traded companies. On the contrary, many listed companies simply do not interact with the media, with some even declining requests to report on their firms. For instance, journalists were able to attend listed companies’ earnings conferences and interact with executives directly before the COVID-19 pandemic, but that changed as companies shifted to online meetings and decreased their interactions with the media.
If things continue like this, it would be difficult for Taiwan to make gains in that category. After all, firms’ openness in their interactions with the media is as important as their financial transparency with shareholders.
The prospects of making Taiwan a healthy market in terms of corporate governance require not just the efforts of the public sector, but also contributions from the private sector.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS