Mining giant Glencore PLC has been extracting copper in the Peruvian province of Espinar for more than a decade. During that time, the presence of toxic metals in the local environment and people has been well documented, but only recently has the Peruvian government acknowledged what was obvious to many on the ground: a causal link between Glencore’s Antapaccay mine operations and pollution in Espinar. The company has yet to make amends with the affected indigenous communities.
Demand for copper — and other critical minerals used in green tech — has increased substantially, but so far, only a handful of countries are responsible for mining and refining these resources. China, for example, accounts for more than 70 percent of rare-earth mining and 50 percent of the world’s (natural) graphite, cobalt, lithium and manganese processing. In the wake of the Ukraine war, many in Europe are wary of depending on a single country.
“The race is on” to dominate clean-energy technology in the future, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said in March, when she announced the Critical Raw Materials Act, which aims to reduce the EU’s current dependencies. Together with the proposed Net-Zero Industry Act, it is the bloc’s response to the US’ Inflation Reduction Act, which includes a commitment to increase the domestic supply of critical minerals.
The rise of industrial policy is not the only evidence that the world is waking up to the importance of raw materials. The International Energy Agency held the first ever global summit on critical minerals and their role in the green transition earlier this year. More recently, while addressing world leaders at this year’s UN Climate Change Conference, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres focused on how best to meet soaring demand for copper, lithium, cobalt and more.
This means that the mining industry, which the UN has categorized as a high-risk sector for human rights, could play an indispensable role in the energy transition. In this context, many European leaders are willing to turn a blind eye to the industry’s human-rights violations and environmental destruction, but neglecting these issues could undermine the EU’s efforts to secure access to raw materials and to mitigate climate change.
In his speech, Guterres stressed that the extraction of critical minerals “must be done in a sustainable, fair, and just way” to avoid repeating the “mistakes of the past” — a reference to the rich world’s historic pattern of systematically exploiting developing countries’ natural-resource wealth. To prevent such an outcome, he announced the creation of a new panel of government, industry and civil-society leaders to draft voluntary guidelines for extractive industries. Similarly, the Minerals Security Partnership, an alliance of wealthy governments, seeks to improve environmental, social and governance standards across the global minerals sector.
While these efforts are a step in the right direction, they would not be enough to ensure that sustainability rules are respected. With the Critical Raw Materials Act, the EU intends to create mutually beneficial partnerships with resource-rich countries and promote strategic projects for critical-mineral mining, processing and recycling.
However, pressure to move fast could lead to the revival of old practices. Moreover, monitoring of compliance with human-rights and environmental standards might be outsourced to private certification providers, at least for projects outside the bloc.
Certification systems have been shown to deliver inadequate human-rights and environmental protections in the mining and raw-materials sectors. For example, the German certification company TUV SUD confirmed the safety of a dam near Brumadinho, Brazil, just months before it failed, killing hundreds of people. More recently, a mine run by BMW’s cobalt supplier in Morocco, which had been certified by the Responsible Minerals Initiative, was found to be releasing large amounts of arsenic into nearby bodies of water.
The EU needs more effective tools. The bloc’s proposed supply chain due diligence directive, which would oblige companies to prevent adverse environmental and human-rights practices in their supply chains, is crucial and should be applied to financial firms as well, given their importance in the raw-materials sector. Moreover, the EU must play an active role in the negotiations for a UN binding treaty on business and human rights, to prevent multinationals from harming the environment and local communities, as happened in Espinar.
Equally important is an honest appraisal of what is driving demand for materials such as copper and iron and how to reduce consumption. The vehicle manufacturing industry, for example, uses huge quantities of critical minerals. Germany’s construction and transport sectors also are the main drivers of demand there, rather than the energy transition. This suggests that European policymakers should build more energy-efficient public-transportation systems, encourage smaller vehicles and batteries, and promote a circular economy.
Even though the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change recommended reducing material consumption to mitigate global warming, this message has been lost in the rush toward renewables, but such an approach would undoubtedly be effective: extracting and processing critical minerals requires vast amounts of water and causes environmental pollution. Seven metals alone — iron, aluminum, copper, zinc, lead, nickel and manganese — are responsible for 7 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions, according to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
By focusing on lowering demand, and introducing more stringent requirements and effective mechanisms for due diligence, the EU could prevent environmental harms and human-rights abuses while also meeting its goal of building a more independent and resilient bloc.
Johanna Sydow is head of the International Environmental Policy Division at the Heinrich Boll Foundation.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS