Black-hearted blue and white
In 1885, just 10 years before Taiwan was ceded to Japan, French writer Emile Zola published his novel, Germinal. Depicting a coal miners’ strike in northern France in the 1860s, the novel was serialized from Nov. 26, 1884, in the periodical Gil Blas.
In 1906, when Taiwan was a Japanese colony, coal miner Lai Wan-fa (賴萬發) asked the coal mine owner to let him build a hut. Along with his fellow miners, Lai started the construction of a hut in Chungfu in Wanli District (萬里). These workers gathered materials from trees, bamboo and thatch, and completed the hut by themselves. Lai was the grandfather of Democratic Progressive Party presidential candidate Vice President William Lai (賴清德).
After years, the hut was dilapidated and torn up due to typhoons. William Lai’s father, Lai Chao-chin (賴朝金), renovated and reconstructed the hut with more solid materials. The hut became a brick house. On Feb. 15, 1958, this house was registered as “No. 7, Fifth Neighborhood, Chungfu,” with Lai’s occupation recorded as “coal miner.” The entire neighborhood consisted of coal miners’ houses. Those buildings were legitimate and later registered as houses on “No. 85, Chungfu Road.”
On Jan. 8, 1960, Lai Chao-chin was working in Wanli’s Chungfu coal mine when an accident happened. He died from carbon monoxide poisoning. He was only 33 years old. When Lai Chao-chin passed away, William Lai was only 95 days old. Lai had lived on Chungfu Road since he was born. After passing his college entrance exam, he moved away and lived in a National Taiwan University dormitory.
In 1975, Taiwanese agencies started using zoning in urban planning and land management. The area where Lai’s old house sits was listed as a “mining area.” Meanwhile, the Mining Act (礦業法) was not revised. As a result, more than 2,000 houses in that “mining area” and their owners have been left in a legal gray area. No existing law or mechanism could be applied to manage those buildings. On the other hand, in military dependents’ villages, the same situation happened in the 1960s and 1970s, when the residents there were accused of having occupied public land for years. The government helped them out with taxpayer money. Military dependents’ village residents were able to receive subsidies and reconstruct their houses in densely populated metropolitan areas. The coal miners were in an entirely different bind. The government, be it blue or green, did not care much about their houses and livelihood.
Zola’s Germinal is about the strike in the French coal mining town of Montsou. In February 1884, a coal miners’ strike was launched in Anzin. On the third day of the strike, Zola visited the coal mining town, recording what happened in detail, paying great attention to all the incidents occurring in relation to the strike. Zola also joined in the workers’ union and meetings, getting to know union leaders and living in miners’ shabby houses. He drank gin with workers and went down into the mining areas to get a glimpse of the miners’ working conditions.
Zola returned to Paris to write Germinal. The most common adjective used in the novel was “black.” He described that due to the coal and ash, there was an utter blackness inside and outside the mines; miners are black all over; their spit is black and so is their blood when they die. Zola illustrated the hardship and misery of coal miners in Germinal, which he used to accuse capitalists and the government of brutal exploitation.
Today in Taiwan, coal miners are experiencing exploitation for the second time. They were exploited by capitalists and the government 117 years ago and are now being bullied by blue and white camp politicians. Those politicians, out of their own interests, are demanding that the son of a coal miner demolish a building left by his father and grandfather. Justice is yet to come.
Liu Chien-lin
Taipei
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of