To alleviate a labor shortage in the hospitality industry, the Tourism Administration is planning to collaborate with the Ministry of Labor to bring in more migrant workers. The demand for workers is rising, and the hospitality and service sectors are asking for more foreigners to cope with it.
Meanwhile, Taiwan is set to sign a memorandum of understanding on labor cooperation with India, aiming to bring in Indian migrant workers to fill the labor gap in the industries. This has attracted much attention and triggered a series of debates.
The number of migrant workers has been increasing rapidly, rising to about 728,000 by the end of last year. Bringing in migrant workers might alleviate the labor shortage in the short term, but if the number keeps increasing without any restrictions, it would not only limit job opportunities, but also worsen the problem of low wages.
Consequently, it would seriously affect Taiwan’s labor market in the long run. Bringing in as many migrant workers as possible might not be the best policy.
Taiwan is to become a super-aged society in 2025, the National Development Council says.
People older than 65 would soon account for 25 percent of the nation’s population. The structure of the labor force would change accordingly. Since many middle-aged and elderly people still have the ability and willingness to continue to work, there is a large pool of idle labor that could be utilized.
The problem is that although middle-aged and elderly people are able to make up for part of the labor force gap, most employers are reluctant to hire them. In the manufacturing, general services, wholesale and retail industries, where the wages are lower than in other industries, the willingness to employ them is the lowest.
In addition to the reluctance to hire such workers, there are fewer opportunities for them to be transferred to other posts. Worse, middle-aged and elderly employees could easily be laid off when businesses experience times of difficulty. They also face stricter reward terms and penalties. Clearly, the current workplace environment is unfriendly to and even discriminatory against middle-aged and elderly people.
This attitude should change. Adjustments and improvements should be made by redesigning jobs and setting up flexible schedules. The purpose is to create a safe and friendly workplace for the disadvantaged. That way, middle-aged and elderly people would be more willing to seek employment opportunities and give full play to their value again.
In this regard, the government can provide vocational retraining for middle-aged and elderly workers to enhance their vocational skills and competitiveness. Job matching mechanisms and other measures such as employment incentives for corporations should be put in place.
The serious labor shortage in Taiwan can hardly be solved overnight, and it depends on the joint efforts of the government, industry and middle-aged and elderly workers.
Dino Wei is an information engineer in Yilan County.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
RSS