As the dust settles on the COP28 climate summit that concluded last week in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, a sobering reality is looming. After the legalistic niceties of environmental diplomacy, the dirtier business of political maneuvering is going to consume the world’s democracies over the next 12 months. Next year, climate is to be on the ballot in a way we have rarely seen.
Voters in countries representing more than 40 percent of the world’s population — and roughly the same share of emissions — are to go to the polls between now and the end of next year. In places, that offers the prospect to break gridlocks on climate and energy policies.
In others, it might offer an opportunity for a climate-denying backlash. Far too few places show a decent chance of accelerating the transition to clean energy in the way advocated by the COP28 agreement. Here is a review of some of the key events:
Two of the world’s three biggest democracies face elections in the first half of next year, but neither offers a strong prospect of change.
India and Indonesia have made positive noises lately about switching to clean power. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has promised 500 gigawatts of renewables by 2030 and Indonesian President Joko Widodo has signed up for a US$20 billion deal to retire the nation’s coal generators early.
However, in each case, coal’s deep political, economic and social roots have stymied efforts at reform. Elections are not likely to change that dynamic: Modi is well ahead in the polls, while the front-runner in Jakarta, Prabowo Subianto, is essentially a continuity candidate who has picked Widodo’s son as his running mate.
Prospects are moderately better in two other leading emerging markets equally wedded to fossil fuels: Mexico and South Africa.
In the former, poll-leading former Mexico City mayor Claudia Sheinbaum, a protege of Mexican President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, is a former climate scientist who has contributed to reports from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
However, it remains unclear whether that background could lead to a switch from Lopez Obrador’s policies, which have favored state oil company Pemex and a growing dependence on gas imported from the US.
In South Africa, the ruling African National Congress (ANC) faces the first prospect of losing since democratic elections began in 1994. In energy terms, that would almost certainly be good news.
The opposition Democratic Alliance’s support of private and solar generation, in contrast to the ANC’s death pact with the corruption-riddled, financially incontinent Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd, offers the best prospect for the country to emerge from its current cycle of power cuts and pollution.
Next is a group of nations where the prospects of real democratic elections seem remote. In Bangladesh and Pakistan, incumbent governments have favored energy policies wedded to imported natural gas. The ripples of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine have pushed liquefied natural gas (LNG) prices out of reach, leading to power cuts, savage increases in electricity bills and often violent protests.
Jailed opposition leaders in each country have offered the promise of more balanced, cleaner energy policies, but the electoral system remains heavily weighted against them.
Elections of sorts are also to be held in two of the world’s biggest historic oil exporters — Russia and Venezuela — though the chances of real change in either country seem remote in the extreme.
In Taiwan, polls appear to be tightening between the incumbent center-left Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and center-right Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) ahead of the Jan. 13 vote.
On paper, the opposition has a mildly more progressive climate policy, since its spurning of the DPP’s anti-nuclear stance gives a lower fossil fuel share in 2030. In practice, it is an open question whether either side could succeed in implementing their green energy policies.
South Korea also has legislative ballots in April, but they are unlikely to break the gridlock that has pitted the unpopular center-right South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol against a more climate-focused assembly for the past two years.
The core developed countries of North America and Europe might be the place where major change is most likely, but in most cases, the mood music is not positive for climate action.
Right-wing, climate-denialist parties in Europe such as the Alternative for Germany and Dutch Freedom Party have seen strong performances in recent opinion surveys and votes.
Even so, it is likely the left-right coalition in the European Parliament would remain in control even if such factions make a strong showing in elections on June 9.
The UK probably offers the best prospect of major positive change, with opposition leader Keir Starmer well ahead in the polls. He has promised to turn the kingdom into a “clean energy superpower,” in stark contrast to British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, who has torn up his predecessors’ green-tinged policies.
Set against that is the most substantive climate poll of the year, the US presidential election on Nov. 5. Former US president Donald Trump’s first term in office failed to break a long-standing trend of falling emissions.
Even so, it is impossible to overstate the contrast a second term would present to the policies of US President Joe Biden, who has promised a zero-carbon grid and mostly electric new car fleet by 2035.
In climate diplomacy, where Washington’s on-again, off-again alliance with Beijing has been essential to bringing other nations to the table over the past three years, the return of a more sinophobic administration would be further bad news.
That is not what the world needs right now. Thanks to the rapid greening of the power sectors in China, Europe and the US, and the speedy uptake of electric vehicles, there is a real prospect that emissions globally peak next year or the year after.
To build on those gains and accelerate the path to net zero, however, further political will is needed to ratchet up policies that are still driving the world to more than 2?C of warming. The bonanza of elections due next year is unlikely to deliver that.
David Fickling is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering energy and commodities. Previously, he worked for Bloomberg News, the Wall Street Journal and the Financial Times. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
A report by the US-based Jamestown Foundation on Tuesday last week warned that China is operating illegal oil drilling inside Taiwan’s exclusive economic zone (EEZ) off the Taiwan-controlled Pratas Island (Dongsha, 東沙群島), marking a sharp escalation in Beijing’s “gray zone” tactics. The report said that, starting in July, state-owned China National Offshore Oil Corp installed 12 permanent or semi-permanent oil rig structures and dozens of associated ships deep inside Taiwan’s EEZ about 48km from the restricted waters of Pratas Island in the northeast of the South China Sea, islands that are home to a Taiwanese garrison. The rigs not only typify
RSS