Miners’ homes and insults
Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) presidential candidate Vice President William Lai’s (賴清德) old family home has come under relentless criticism. For years, Taiwanese have repressed their anger, only to realize that when giving knaves an inch, the powerful take a mile. Taiwanese are generous and willing to let go of the past. They do not want to harbor animosity. However, they have not forgotten the unfairness they suffered. They have had enough.
About 70 years ago, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) was forced to relocate to Taiwan. Here, it built numerous military dependents’ villages for those who came along to settle down. Not only were they given houses, they were entitled to many benefits. Years later, the military dependents’ villages underwent reconstruction. Residents were offered new houses for free. Some of those new houses were worth tens of millions of New Taiwan dollars, paid for by Taiwanese taxes.
Taiwanese miners toiled and exchanged their lives for meager wages to support their families. Many built a small shack next to mining areas to live in.
After decades, those homes are dilapidated, but the miners who own them could not enjoy the same benefits given to military dependents’ village residents. Instead, miners have to make renovations out of their own pockets, and to add insult to injury, they are often accused of building illegal structures. Some vested interest groups have even mocked refurbished shacks and “checked-in” at locations in a sarcastic manner.
For decades, Taiwanese have contributed to Taiwan, and their contribution is by no means any less than those who came with the KMT. Taiwanese should not be treated as second-class citizens and miners should make themselves heard. Miners’ houses have stood around for decades. They are not “illegal structures.”
To the younger generations: If you do not know how Taiwanese were treated in the past; if you believe that Lai’s old home is an illegal structure, please ask your grandparents what they have been through. Your elders would tell you stories of injustice, unfairness and decades-long suffering.
Peng Jui-mei
Taipei
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s