Since the histrionic breakup of the planned “blue-white alliance,” polls have shown a massive drop in support for Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲). To make up for his lost support, Ko has proposed that opposition parties form a coalition government to replace the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which would be an absolute nightmare for Taiwan.
The most recent example of a political alliance was between the DPP and Ko in 2018. With the DPP not nominating its own candidate and giving Ko its full support, he emerged triumphant as the mayor of Taipei.
However, Ko’s character soon drove personnel away from him. Former Straits Exchange Foundation secretary-general Yao Jen-to (姚人多), former DPP deputy secretary-general Sidney Lin (林鶴明), former minister without portfolio Lin Chin-chang (林錦昌), former New Party legislator Yao Li-ming (姚立明) and former deputy minister of labor Su Li-chung (蘇麗瓊) all left after Ko was voted in.
However, Ko said all those who left him were “jumping ship” as their political interests evaporated. To find fault with then-Taipei Agricultural Products Marketing (TAPM) general manager Wu Yin-ning (吳音寧), who had been appointed by the DPP, Ko colluded with the KMT, smearing Wu by accusing her of using “business promotion funds” to purchase 60 bottles of wine as a gift for the DPP’s Taipei office, having the Taipei Department of Legal Affairs investigate and audit the TAPM books, as well as inciting the Taipei City Market Administration Office to fabricate a scandal that Wu was sending leftovers to charity groups. All of this mudslinging was carried out with the aim of forcing Wu to resign.
Aside from the Grand Hyatt “blue-white alliance” horror show presided over by former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), when the coalition had not yet been agreed upon, Ko made mind-boggling comments: He said he had been “duped” by KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫), that every KMT legislator-at-large seat came with a big, fat price tag, that the KMT was spending a staggering NT$2 billion to NT$10 billion (US$63.88 million to US$319.39 million) on its presidential campaign and vowed to “oversee the president” if elected.
If the TPP and KMT were to collaborate, there is a high possibility that Ko would do the same as when he was Taipei mayor: tyrannize the DPP. As Taipei did not see much improvement in the eight years Ko was in office, Taiwan would be in for the same fate if Ko were elected. Taiwan would bring destruction upon itself without China firing a single shot.
Ko’s campaign slogan “unite Taiwan, coalition government” is a joke. Ever since he entered the political arena, he has been sowing discord and ethnic division to increase his support base. He first said he was “deep green” to woo DPP supporters, and then flip-flopped to demonstrate his neutrality, finally offering Chinese spouse Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) a spot on the TPP’s legislator-at-large list to attract “deep blue” supporters.
The best way to assess a politician is not to listen to what they say, but to see if their actions match their words. For a wily, capricious politician such as Ko, who enjoys creating partisan division and using slander to cover up for his incompetence, perhaps “mudslinging and sowing division in Taiwan’’ is a better campaign slogan.
A TPP-KMT coalition government would be a political catastrophe. Supporters should cast their presidential, party and legislative ballots for the pro-Taiwan party. Only with a majority in the legislature will the elected president be free to push his vision and policies without restraint, with party politics fit for a Taiwanese democracy.
Robert Wang is a writer.
Translated by Rita Wang
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,