Since the histrionic breakup of the planned “blue-white alliance,” polls have shown a massive drop in support for Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲). To make up for his lost support, Ko has proposed that opposition parties form a coalition government to replace the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which would be an absolute nightmare for Taiwan.
The most recent example of a political alliance was between the DPP and Ko in 2018. With the DPP not nominating its own candidate and giving Ko its full support, he emerged triumphant as the mayor of Taipei.
However, Ko’s character soon drove personnel away from him. Former Straits Exchange Foundation secretary-general Yao Jen-to (姚人多), former DPP deputy secretary-general Sidney Lin (林鶴明), former minister without portfolio Lin Chin-chang (林錦昌), former New Party legislator Yao Li-ming (姚立明) and former deputy minister of labor Su Li-chung (蘇麗瓊) all left after Ko was voted in.
However, Ko said all those who left him were “jumping ship” as their political interests evaporated. To find fault with then-Taipei Agricultural Products Marketing (TAPM) general manager Wu Yin-ning (吳音寧), who had been appointed by the DPP, Ko colluded with the KMT, smearing Wu by accusing her of using “business promotion funds” to purchase 60 bottles of wine as a gift for the DPP’s Taipei office, having the Taipei Department of Legal Affairs investigate and audit the TAPM books, as well as inciting the Taipei City Market Administration Office to fabricate a scandal that Wu was sending leftovers to charity groups. All of this mudslinging was carried out with the aim of forcing Wu to resign.
Aside from the Grand Hyatt “blue-white alliance” horror show presided over by former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), when the coalition had not yet been agreed upon, Ko made mind-boggling comments: He said he had been “duped” by KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫), that every KMT legislator-at-large seat came with a big, fat price tag, that the KMT was spending a staggering NT$2 billion to NT$10 billion (US$63.88 million to US$319.39 million) on its presidential campaign and vowed to “oversee the president” if elected.
If the TPP and KMT were to collaborate, there is a high possibility that Ko would do the same as when he was Taipei mayor: tyrannize the DPP. As Taipei did not see much improvement in the eight years Ko was in office, Taiwan would be in for the same fate if Ko were elected. Taiwan would bring destruction upon itself without China firing a single shot.
Ko’s campaign slogan “unite Taiwan, coalition government” is a joke. Ever since he entered the political arena, he has been sowing discord and ethnic division to increase his support base. He first said he was “deep green” to woo DPP supporters, and then flip-flopped to demonstrate his neutrality, finally offering Chinese spouse Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) a spot on the TPP’s legislator-at-large list to attract “deep blue” supporters.
The best way to assess a politician is not to listen to what they say, but to see if their actions match their words. For a wily, capricious politician such as Ko, who enjoys creating partisan division and using slander to cover up for his incompetence, perhaps “mudslinging and sowing division in Taiwan’’ is a better campaign slogan.
A TPP-KMT coalition government would be a political catastrophe. Supporters should cast their presidential, party and legislative ballots for the pro-Taiwan party. Only with a majority in the legislature will the elected president be free to push his vision and policies without restraint, with party politics fit for a Taiwanese democracy.
Robert Wang is a writer.
Translated by Rita Wang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS