Since the histrionic breakup of the planned “blue-white alliance,” polls have shown a massive drop in support for Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲). To make up for his lost support, Ko has proposed that opposition parties form a coalition government to replace the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which would be an absolute nightmare for Taiwan.
The most recent example of a political alliance was between the DPP and Ko in 2018. With the DPP not nominating its own candidate and giving Ko its full support, he emerged triumphant as the mayor of Taipei.
However, Ko’s character soon drove personnel away from him. Former Straits Exchange Foundation secretary-general Yao Jen-to (姚人多), former DPP deputy secretary-general Sidney Lin (林鶴明), former minister without portfolio Lin Chin-chang (林錦昌), former New Party legislator Yao Li-ming (姚立明) and former deputy minister of labor Su Li-chung (蘇麗瓊) all left after Ko was voted in.
However, Ko said all those who left him were “jumping ship” as their political interests evaporated. To find fault with then-Taipei Agricultural Products Marketing (TAPM) general manager Wu Yin-ning (吳音寧), who had been appointed by the DPP, Ko colluded with the KMT, smearing Wu by accusing her of using “business promotion funds” to purchase 60 bottles of wine as a gift for the DPP’s Taipei office, having the Taipei Department of Legal Affairs investigate and audit the TAPM books, as well as inciting the Taipei City Market Administration Office to fabricate a scandal that Wu was sending leftovers to charity groups. All of this mudslinging was carried out with the aim of forcing Wu to resign.
Aside from the Grand Hyatt “blue-white alliance” horror show presided over by former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), when the coalition had not yet been agreed upon, Ko made mind-boggling comments: He said he had been “duped” by KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫), that every KMT legislator-at-large seat came with a big, fat price tag, that the KMT was spending a staggering NT$2 billion to NT$10 billion (US$63.88 million to US$319.39 million) on its presidential campaign and vowed to “oversee the president” if elected.
If the TPP and KMT were to collaborate, there is a high possibility that Ko would do the same as when he was Taipei mayor: tyrannize the DPP. As Taipei did not see much improvement in the eight years Ko was in office, Taiwan would be in for the same fate if Ko were elected. Taiwan would bring destruction upon itself without China firing a single shot.
Ko’s campaign slogan “unite Taiwan, coalition government” is a joke. Ever since he entered the political arena, he has been sowing discord and ethnic division to increase his support base. He first said he was “deep green” to woo DPP supporters, and then flip-flopped to demonstrate his neutrality, finally offering Chinese spouse Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) a spot on the TPP’s legislator-at-large list to attract “deep blue” supporters.
The best way to assess a politician is not to listen to what they say, but to see if their actions match their words. For a wily, capricious politician such as Ko, who enjoys creating partisan division and using slander to cover up for his incompetence, perhaps “mudslinging and sowing division in Taiwan’’ is a better campaign slogan.
A TPP-KMT coalition government would be a political catastrophe. Supporters should cast their presidential, party and legislative ballots for the pro-Taiwan party. Only with a majority in the legislature will the elected president be free to push his vision and policies without restraint, with party politics fit for a Taiwanese democracy.
Robert Wang is a writer.
Translated by Rita Wang
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS