The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has nominated Taipei City Councilor Wang Jia-jen (王家貞) as a legislative candidate for Tainan’s fifth electoral district, but she is on probation after being convicted of forgery. Under the Public Officials Election and Recall Act (公職人員選舉罷免法) she cannot run as a candidate. Accordingly, the Tainan City Electoral Commission on Friday last week announced that Wang is not eligible.
She responded by accusing the Democratic Progressive Party of acting unconstitutionally and unlawfully by depriving a citizen of their right of political participation. She held a rally on Saturday, calling for people to “get angry” and not vote for “any old candidate.”
KMT Legislator Sandy Yu (游毓蘭) and the Tainan City Council KMT caucus say that Wang’s probation prevents her from running for office due to amendments to the act enacted at the end of May.
The amendments to Article 26 added a number of new conditions for not being able to register as a candidate. The regulations originally only applied to those who had committed sedition or treason, but the amendments added provisions affecting those found guilty of corruption or offenses against the Organized Crime Prevention Act (組織犯罪防制條例), National Security Act (國家安全法), Classified National Security Information Protection Act (國家機密保護法), National Intelligence Work Act (國家情報工作法), Narcotics Hazard Prevention Act (毒品危害防制條例), Controlling Guns, Ammunition and Knives Act (槍砲彈藥刀械管制條例) or Money Laundering Control Act (洗錢防制法).
Is Wang really ineligible under the changes because she was convicted and sentenced to probation for forgery?
In July 2017, the Ministry of the Interior passed draft amendments to the Public Officials Election and Recall Act, which stipulate that those who have been convicted of bribing voters, obstructing their freedom to vote or similar or equivalent offenses, and those who have been sentenced to the death penalty, life in prison or imprisonment of more than 10 years, but whose sentence has not been confirmed, including those who are on probation, cannot register as candidates for public office.
The ministry sent these draft amendments to the Legislative Yuan for deliberation. Having been enacted, the amended clauses came into effect in time for the November 2018 local government elections.
The matter of not being allowed to register as a candidate while on probation is due not to the amendments to the Public Officials Election and Recall Act that were passed at the end of May, but because of the 2017 amendments. The KMT’s fallacious argument of “using a Qing Dynasty sword to behead a Ming Dynasty official” glosses over the party’s inability to review the eligibility of its own nominees and that Wang was convicted of forgery related to her assistants’ expenses.
Nevertheless, Wang and the KMT expect the residents of Tainan to “get angry” and refuse to vote for “any old candidate.” The KMT clearly underestimates the intelligence of voters.
Although Wang cannot stand as a legislative candidate, she can continue to serve as a city councilor, so her right of political participation has not been denied. Furthermore, it is worth asking why KMT Legislator Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) could be jailed for a year while still in office, while Wang can merrily continue as a city councilor after being convicted of fraud.
Lin Han is a junior-high schoolteacher.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS