The Chinese government is using TikTok and other social media platforms to sow discontent among Taiwanese over policy issues, and to sway young voters toward pro-China candidates, an official said on Sunday. Videos from Chinese content farms produced under the instruction of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aim to vilify Taiwan’s conscription policy and create a sense that war would be imminent if the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is re-elected, they said.
The Executive Yuan last year rejected calls to ban public use of TikTok, saying there is no legal basis for doing so. In the US, several states have banned government agencies, and their employees and contractors, from using TikTok on government-issued devices. However, in the US there is also no legal basis for banning civilians from using TikTok or any other platform on their personal devices. China is aware of such legal limitations, and it uses free speech and other democratic freedoms against the countries that protect those freedoms. Meanwhile, Chinese social media companies are free to operate unrestricted in democracies, openly facilitating China’s cognitive warfare efforts.
Exacerbating the situation is the tendency of the CCP to insert itself in discourse on China-related concerns by infiltrating university campuses, paying off politicians and using fake accounts on social media. The situation leaves governments scrambling to find ways to prevent China from exporting its dystopian ideology. Governments must find ways to combat disinformation and mitigate efforts to influence young voters without treading on press and speech freedoms. The best option is empowering the public through media literacy campaigns. Courses that teach young students to identify potential disinformation and how to verify the authenticity of questionable information should be a required part of school curricula.
However, artificial intelligence (AI) is making it harder to distinguish real news sources from disinformation. A recent CNN report said Chinese content farms are using AI to make deepfake videos, including a recent one that depicts Vice President William Lai (賴清德), the DPP’s presidential candidate, making comments favorable toward China. To fight this trend, national security officials might need to use AI to defend against the technology. For example, the government could employ AI-powered fact-checking at the Internet service provider level. Content suspected of containing disinformation could be flagged for fact-checking by an independent body and confirmed disinformation could be watermarked with a warning before it reaches users.
Another aim of China’s cognitive warfare efforts has been to foster pro-China sentiment among young Taiwanese, partly by inviting students to China to attend exchange events. While this might not seem inherently worrisome, the issue is that China regularly detains foreigners including Taiwanese. There has been a growing number of reports over the past year of students, professors and researchers being arbitrarily detained upon entering China, and in some cases facing arrest over past comments or actions seen as supporting Taiwanese independence.
Taiwanese who are lured by a false sense that visiting China is safe are at great risk, particularly because there are no channels through which Taiwan can provide assistance to citizens who find themselves detained in China. The channels that did exist through the Straits Exchange Foundation and the Mainland Affairs Council have broken down, because the CCP hopes to pressure voters into electing pro-China opposition candidates.
With the presidential and legislative elections just around the corner, the government must ensure it is on top of efforts to combat Chinese disinformation and influence campaigns. Pro-China forces in Taiwan that collaborate on Chinese efforts will add to the challenge, but authorities must remain vigilant, and work to counter them.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS