The Chinese government is using TikTok and other social media platforms to sow discontent among Taiwanese over policy issues, and to sway young voters toward pro-China candidates, an official said on Sunday. Videos from Chinese content farms produced under the instruction of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aim to vilify Taiwan’s conscription policy and create a sense that war would be imminent if the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is re-elected, they said.
The Executive Yuan last year rejected calls to ban public use of TikTok, saying there is no legal basis for doing so. In the US, several states have banned government agencies, and their employees and contractors, from using TikTok on government-issued devices. However, in the US there is also no legal basis for banning civilians from using TikTok or any other platform on their personal devices. China is aware of such legal limitations, and it uses free speech and other democratic freedoms against the countries that protect those freedoms. Meanwhile, Chinese social media companies are free to operate unrestricted in democracies, openly facilitating China’s cognitive warfare efforts.
Exacerbating the situation is the tendency of the CCP to insert itself in discourse on China-related concerns by infiltrating university campuses, paying off politicians and using fake accounts on social media. The situation leaves governments scrambling to find ways to prevent China from exporting its dystopian ideology. Governments must find ways to combat disinformation and mitigate efforts to influence young voters without treading on press and speech freedoms. The best option is empowering the public through media literacy campaigns. Courses that teach young students to identify potential disinformation and how to verify the authenticity of questionable information should be a required part of school curricula.
However, artificial intelligence (AI) is making it harder to distinguish real news sources from disinformation. A recent CNN report said Chinese content farms are using AI to make deepfake videos, including a recent one that depicts Vice President William Lai (賴清德), the DPP’s presidential candidate, making comments favorable toward China. To fight this trend, national security officials might need to use AI to defend against the technology. For example, the government could employ AI-powered fact-checking at the Internet service provider level. Content suspected of containing disinformation could be flagged for fact-checking by an independent body and confirmed disinformation could be watermarked with a warning before it reaches users.
Another aim of China’s cognitive warfare efforts has been to foster pro-China sentiment among young Taiwanese, partly by inviting students to China to attend exchange events. While this might not seem inherently worrisome, the issue is that China regularly detains foreigners including Taiwanese. There has been a growing number of reports over the past year of students, professors and researchers being arbitrarily detained upon entering China, and in some cases facing arrest over past comments or actions seen as supporting Taiwanese independence.
Taiwanese who are lured by a false sense that visiting China is safe are at great risk, particularly because there are no channels through which Taiwan can provide assistance to citizens who find themselves detained in China. The channels that did exist through the Straits Exchange Foundation and the Mainland Affairs Council have broken down, because the CCP hopes to pressure voters into electing pro-China opposition candidates.
With the presidential and legislative elections just around the corner, the government must ensure it is on top of efforts to combat Chinese disinformation and influence campaigns. Pro-China forces in Taiwan that collaborate on Chinese efforts will add to the challenge, but authorities must remain vigilant, and work to counter them.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS