The Chinese government is using TikTok and other social media platforms to sow discontent among Taiwanese over policy issues, and to sway young voters toward pro-China candidates, an official said on Sunday. Videos from Chinese content farms produced under the instruction of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aim to vilify Taiwan’s conscription policy and create a sense that war would be imminent if the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is re-elected, they said.
The Executive Yuan last year rejected calls to ban public use of TikTok, saying there is no legal basis for doing so. In the US, several states have banned government agencies, and their employees and contractors, from using TikTok on government-issued devices. However, in the US there is also no legal basis for banning civilians from using TikTok or any other platform on their personal devices. China is aware of such legal limitations, and it uses free speech and other democratic freedoms against the countries that protect those freedoms. Meanwhile, Chinese social media companies are free to operate unrestricted in democracies, openly facilitating China’s cognitive warfare efforts.
Exacerbating the situation is the tendency of the CCP to insert itself in discourse on China-related concerns by infiltrating university campuses, paying off politicians and using fake accounts on social media. The situation leaves governments scrambling to find ways to prevent China from exporting its dystopian ideology. Governments must find ways to combat disinformation and mitigate efforts to influence young voters without treading on press and speech freedoms. The best option is empowering the public through media literacy campaigns. Courses that teach young students to identify potential disinformation and how to verify the authenticity of questionable information should be a required part of school curricula.
However, artificial intelligence (AI) is making it harder to distinguish real news sources from disinformation. A recent CNN report said Chinese content farms are using AI to make deepfake videos, including a recent one that depicts Vice President William Lai (賴清德), the DPP’s presidential candidate, making comments favorable toward China. To fight this trend, national security officials might need to use AI to defend against the technology. For example, the government could employ AI-powered fact-checking at the Internet service provider level. Content suspected of containing disinformation could be flagged for fact-checking by an independent body and confirmed disinformation could be watermarked with a warning before it reaches users.
Another aim of China’s cognitive warfare efforts has been to foster pro-China sentiment among young Taiwanese, partly by inviting students to China to attend exchange events. While this might not seem inherently worrisome, the issue is that China regularly detains foreigners including Taiwanese. There has been a growing number of reports over the past year of students, professors and researchers being arbitrarily detained upon entering China, and in some cases facing arrest over past comments or actions seen as supporting Taiwanese independence.
Taiwanese who are lured by a false sense that visiting China is safe are at great risk, particularly because there are no channels through which Taiwan can provide assistance to citizens who find themselves detained in China. The channels that did exist through the Straits Exchange Foundation and the Mainland Affairs Council have broken down, because the CCP hopes to pressure voters into electing pro-China opposition candidates.
With the presidential and legislative elections just around the corner, the government must ensure it is on top of efforts to combat Chinese disinformation and influence campaigns. Pro-China forces in Taiwan that collaborate on Chinese efforts will add to the challenge, but authorities must remain vigilant, and work to counter them.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
RSS