The US House of Representatives last week authorized an impeachment inquiry into US President Joe Biden. The vote went strictly along party lines, with every Republican voting for it and every Democrat against. Clearly, the US House epitomizes the political divide in the country.
Today, the Republican Party and the Democratic Party are on par with one another, each supported equally by Americans. As a result, the US government has often become paralyzed due to a lack of collaboration between the parties. Worse, the House and the White House tend to hold each other back, leaving the entire government in limbo.
During the US midterm elections in November last year, the Republicans gained a narrow majority in the House. This was the starting point of the most recent political turbulence in the US. In January, Kevin McCarthy was elected House speaker after 15 rounds of voting. Nine months later, he was ousted. In exchange for being elected, McCarthy allegedly promised his right-wing colleagues an impeachment inquiry into Biden. It is believed that he revised regulations to make the impeachment procedure easier.
In September, McCarthy worked with the Democrats to pass a funding bill to avoid a government shutdown. Some Republicans were outraged by his move and planned to oust him from the speakership.
The polarization of the two parties resulted in a political quagmire in which the Republicans and the Democrats always oppose each other’s agendas. For example, even though McCarthy sought a bipartisan collaboration that would benefit the Biden administration, the Democrats still unanimously voted to oust him.
New US House Speaker Mike Johnson tried to suspend the impeachment inquiry into Biden, but faced great political pressure from fellow Republicans, who wanted to take revenge on the Democrats for twice impeaching former US president Donald Trump.
Without a majority in the US Congress, the extremists in each party often gain more power, and because of them, the legislative branch becomes paralyzed and left in limbo. When hardliners become more influential, they become even fiercer, while the moderates can only give ground. This leads to a vicious circle, and polarization intensifies.
US society is also under the influence of such divisions and antagonism. According to The Atlantic, US democracy is in trouble. The democratic recession cannot be more obvious today.
The Global Times, owned by the Chinese Communist Party, was happy to see political turmoil in the US. In an editorial, the newspaper wrote that political affairs in the US demonstrate the problems with the country’s political system, which are becoming more serious each day.
Undoubtedly, the impotence of the US House and the potential shutdown of the federal government have influenced the country’s ability to conduct foreign affairs. It has severely damaged the reputation and leadership of the US, as evidenced by the Republicans’ interference in approving urgent military aid to Ukraine and Israel.
To restore its system of governance, the US can only hope for and depend on democracy’s own mechanisms to repair itself and put things back on the right track. For voters in Taiwan, this is a valuable lesson. It is imperative to keep the legislature stable by maintaining a majority. Taiwanese should not let the Legislative Yuan become polarized. An intense antagonism between the ruling and the opposition parties must be avoided.
Chen Yung-chang is a company manager.
Translated by Emma Liu
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in recent days was the focus of the media due to his role in arranging a Chinese “student” group to visit Taiwan. While his team defends the visit as friendly, civilized and apolitical, the general impression is that it was a political stunt orchestrated as part of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) propaganda, as its members were mainly young communists or university graduates who speak of a future of a unified country. While Ma lived in Taiwan almost his entire life — except during his early childhood in Hong Kong and student years in the US —
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
Prior to marrying a Taiwanese and moving to Taiwan, a Chinese woman, surnamed Zhang (張), used her elder sister’s identity to deceive Chinese officials and obtain a resident identity card in China. After marrying a Taiwanese, surnamed Chen (陳) and applying to move to Taiwan, Zhang continued to impersonate her sister to obtain a Republic of China ID card. She used the false identity in Taiwan for 18 years. However, a judge ruled that her case does not constitute forgery and acquitted her. Does this mean that — as long as a sibling agrees — people can impersonate others to alter, forge
In response to a failure to understand the “good intentions” behind the use of the term “motherland,” a professor from China’s Fudan University recklessly claimed that Taiwan used to be a colony, so all it needs is a “good beating.” Such logic is risible. The Central Plains people in China were once colonized by the Mongolians, the Manchus and other foreign peoples — does that mean they also deserve a “good beating?” According to the professor, having been ruled by the Cheng Dynasty — named after its founder, Ming-loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) — as the Kingdom of Tungning,
RSS