While presidential and legislative election campaigns continue to heat up in Taiwan, Hong Kong on Dec. 10 held its first “patriots only” district council elections, which attracted a voter turnout of just 27.5 percent, the lowest since the territory was handed over to China in 1997. It was a massive plunge from the 2019 district elections amid democracy protests, when a record-high 71.23 percent of voters cast ballots, leading to a landslide victory for the democratic camp, which captured more than 85 percent of the seats.
After the 2019 election, Beijing imposed oppressive national security legislation on Hong Kong, while the Chinese National People’s Congress in 2021 revamped the territory’s electoral system, ensuring that only “patriots” could run for office. The number of directly elected district council seats was slashed from 462 to 88, with the other 382 controlled by the Hong Kong authorities and Chinese government loyalists. All candidates must be nominated by Hong Kong government committees, which have shut out all pro-democracy parties and advocates.
China also clamped down on dissent before the Dec. 10 election, while the Hong Kong government spent HK$1.15 billion (US$147.44 million) to promote election campaigns, including providing incentives for voters and asking all civil servants to participate.
However, the low turnout, compounded with a previous record-low turnout of 30.2 percent for the Seventh Legislative Council election in 2021, indicates that quite a few Hong Kongers decided not to bother because there were no real options on the ballots. The low turnout is obviously a “huge humiliation” to Hong Kong and Chinese authorities, as voters made a speechless protest over the China-controlled elections.
It also reflects Hong Kongers’ disillusionment with China’s “one country, two systems” fabrication, which pledged to allow free elections, but turned out to be a Hobson’s choice that contradicts universal democratic principles. “Hong Kongers ruling Hong Kong” has been replaced by “China-assigned patriots administering Hong Kong.”
The territory’s anti-democratic elections should be a warning for Taiwanese, especially as Beijing ramps up its efforts to manipulate Taiwan’s elections, aiming to help the pro-China camp acquire power and leadership, just like it did in Hong Kong.
One major component of China’s interference is deploying coercive military drills while depicting Taiwan’s elections as a choice between war and peace, hoping to scare Taiwanese into voting for pro-China candidates and parties, such as the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party, both of which echo China’s language and call for closer cross-strait relations to ensure peace. Meanwhile, amid Chinese trade bans designed to suppress Taiwan’s economy, KMT presidential candidate New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) has proposed resuming the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement to deepen the nation’s reliance on the Chinese market, and vowed to open up for more Chinese to study and work in Taiwan. The proposals ignore the international trend of decoupling from China, which itself is undergoing economic hardships, and could sacrifice the welfare and rights of Taiwanese.
China has offered incentives to Taiwanese as part of its attempts to influence the elections, including underwriting trips for Taiwanese to visit China and providing benefits to encourage Taiwanese to relocate to Chinese coastal provinces. All of Beijing’s “united front” tactics are part of Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) proposal of a new “one country, two systems” framework and deepening cross-strait integration for “peaceful unification,” which aims to eventually make Taiwan another Hong Kong.
Looking at Hong Kong’s anti-democratic election as a lesson, Taiwanese should seek to safeguard Taiwan’s precious democracy and self-determined sovereignty in next month’s polls.
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
US president-elect Donald Trump is to return to the White House in January, but his second term would surely be different from the first. His Cabinet would not include former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo and former US national security adviser John Bolton, both outspoken supporters of Taiwan. Trump is expected to implement a transactionalist approach to Taiwan, including measures such as demanding that Taiwan pay a high “protection fee” or requiring that Taiwan’s military spending amount to at least 10 percent of its GDP. However, if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) invades Taiwan, it is doubtful that Trump would dispatch
World leaders are preparing themselves for a second Donald Trump presidency. Some leaders know more or less where he stands: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy knows that a difficult negotiation process is about to be forced on his country, and the leaders of NATO countries would be well aware of being complacent about US military support with Trump in power. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu would likely be feeling relief as the constraints placed on him by the US President Joe Biden administration would finally be released. However, for President William Lai (賴清德) the calculation is not simple. Trump has surrounded himself