Hackneyed insults unwanted
Not long ago, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential and vice presidential candidates, New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) and Broadcasting Corp of China chairman Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康), were interviewed by KMT Taipei City Councilor Chung Pei-chun (鍾沛君). When defending Hou during the interview, Jaw was a little too excited and went so far as to say that “People in the south [of Taiwan] are straightforward, so children having an argument might get into a [physical] fight easily when being inflamed by others. Taipei people like to argue while people in the south like to fight. Really!”
Such a statement is controversial.
I can only sigh: Jaw is doing it again. He is either agitating the ancestral origin sentiment or provoking ethnic and regional confrontation. When running for Taipei mayor as the New Party’s candidate in 1994, Jaw and his camp said that if Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) mayoral candidate Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) were elected, he might immediately force all Chinese mainlanders in Taiwan to jump into the Tamsui River (淡水河).
Jaw once even claimed that if the DPP gained power, the Republic of China was likely to perish. Such claims, of course, were absurd. Surprisingly, three decades later, he is still up to his same old tricks.
In comparison, Taiwanese entertainer Rainie Yang (楊丞琳) recently joked at a show that people from China’s Henan Province like to cheat, and was strongly pressured online by Chinese people to publicly apologize. As a candidate for Taiwan’s “alternate” head of state, should Jaw not issue a public apology for causing a confrontation between the north and the south of the country?
I am not saying that Jaw’s speech should be censored, nor am I encouraging people to criticize him on social media. He must have heard a lot of complaints by now, and should at least try to look back on his own behavior. We are living in the 21st century — does he really want to play this kind of unclassy and distasteful campaign trick in today’s social atmosphere? If the vice presidential candidate wants to lose more votes, then he should just continue what he is doing.
Victor Hung
Taichung
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
RSS