Inflation in several advanced countries has continued to drop over the past few months as they avoided a hard landing in their economies. This means major central banks’ aggressive interest rate hikes over the past two years to curb rising consumer prices have been successful. It also suggests that there is about to be a turning point with a potential pivot by central banks to shift toward less restrictive monetary policies.
On Wednesday last week, the US Federal Reserve in its policy-setting Federal Open Market Committee meeting unanimously agreed to keep the target range of its Fed funds rate unchanged at 5.25 to 5.50 percent. It was the fourth pause by the US central bank this year after having raised rates 11 times since March last year. It also hinted at three 25 basis-point cuts next year as a new phase in monetary policy is approaching.
A day later, the European Central Bank maintained its three key interest rates on main refinancing operations, the marginal lending facility and the deposit facility at 4.5 percent, 4.75 percent and 4 percent respectively for a second successive meeting.
As expected, the Bank of England on Thursday decided to keep its key policy rate at 5.25 percent for the third consecutive meeting, but stressed that its monetary policy would remain restrictive until inflation falls to the 2 percent target in the medium term.
Meanwhile, the Australian central bank on Dec. 4 kept its cash rate unchanged at 4.35 percent, the first pause after a hike of 25 basis points last month.
On Thursday, Taiwan’s central bank also maintained its discount rate, the rate on refinancing of secured loans and the rate on temporary accommodations at 1.875 percent, 2.25 percent and 4.125 percent respectively, keeping them the same for a third consecutive quarter.
There is no doubt that the interest rate hike cycle of major central banks is coming to an end as inflation gradually recedes and concerns about an economic slowdown grow. The market’s focus has turned to whether central banks plan to cut rates.
Taiwan’s central bank last week said it might not follow the Fed in lowering interest rates next year as the situation in Taiwan is different than in the US.
First, most research institutes expect Taiwan’s economy next year to grow about 3 percent, while the US’ GDP growth is expected to slow down.
Second, Taiwan’s inflation might ease more slowly than expected, given that the central bank last week revised its inflation forecasts for this year and next year upward to 2.46 percent and 1.89 percent respectively, from previous estimates of 2.22 percent and 1.83 percent. In contrast, the Fed last week lowered its inflation forecasts for the same period to 2.8 percent this year and 2.4 percent next year, from its earlier estimates of 3.3 percent and 2.5 percent respectively. This reduces the likelihood of rate cuts in Taiwan.
Third, domestic interest rates have since early last year been much more stable than the US’, rising only 75 basis points compared with the 525 basis-point increase in the US over the same period, giving the former more leeway in exercising its monetary policy. Therefore, the timing of Fed rate normalization would not have a significant impact on the Taiwanese central bank’s rate decisions next year.
There is a growing divergence in the timing of central banks’ rate cuts for next year, as some are concerned about slowing economic activity and employment, while others insist that future interest rate decisions would remain data-dependent. This division not only reflects the material differences in the economic fundamentals of countries, but also signals that macroeconomic uncertainties and geopolitical conflicts can be expected to add to central banks’ wait-and-see stance.
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The US election result will significantly impact its foreign policy with global implications. As tensions escalate in the Taiwan Strait and conflicts elsewhere draw attention away from the western Pacific, Taiwan was closely monitoring the election, as many believe that whoever won would confront an increasingly assertive China, especially with speculation over a potential escalation in or around 2027. A second Donald Trump presidency naturally raises questions concerning the future of US policy toward China and Taiwan, with Trump displaying mixed signals as to his position on the cross-strait conflict. US foreign policy would also depend on Trump’s Cabinet and
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
Republican candidate and former US president Donald Trump is to be the 47th president of the US after beating his Democratic rival, US Vice President Kamala Harris, in the election on Tuesday. Trump’s thumping victory — winning 295 Electoral College votes against Harris’ 226 as of press time last night, along with the Republicans winning control of the US Senate and possibly the House of Representatives — is a remarkable political comeback from his 2020 defeat to US President Joe Biden, and means Trump has a strong political mandate to implement his agenda. What does Trump’s victory mean for Taiwan, Asia, deterrence