At the end of last month, I was invited by the Friends of Lee Teng-hui Association to attend a forum in Japan and give a keynote speech on the Jan. 13 presidential election.
The global community is concerned about Taiwan’s future, yet according to my observation overseas, the people least concerned are Taiwanese.
This does not mean that Taiwanese are indifferent to politics. Compared with Japanese, Taiwanese are political enthusiasts. However, those involved usually do not know what they are doing, and Taiwanese do not know the significance of the ballot in their hands. The election results could change the world.
Taiwan’s public might feel that foreigners have no right and no place to meddle in local politics. After all, people are most concerned about the economy and putting food on the table. What has Taiwan’s future or politics got to do with the Japanese?
However, Taiwanese politics is no longer a domestic affair. It is a global one. In August, the Japanese government sent former Japanese prime minister Taro Aso to Taiwan to inquire about the political vision of Vice President Willam Lai (賴清德), the Democratic Progressive Party’s presidential candidate, and the direction Lai has in store for the nation. Before that, Aso also met with Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate and New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) and Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘). Aso’s move confirmed that the Japanese government was approaching all potential presidential candidates with the aim of getting first-hand information.
Despite what pro-China politicians and fake news have been saying, Japan has taken serious the stance of “if Taiwan has a problem, then Japan has a problem.” For Japan, it is more than just a political slogan — it is a hard reality. If China makes a move against Taiwan, the question of sending aid to Taiwan goes without saying for Japan, because China would be blocking Japan’s maritime transportation of oil supplies and other strategic goods, and undermining the defense of Japan’s southwestern waters if Tokyo chooses to maintain neutrality. Before a potential invasion, China is likely to first attack joint US military bases in Japan. As a result, Tokyo could be the one facing trouble even before Taipei does.
It is understandable why the global community would be so concerned about Taiwan’s elections. The elections could play a role in determining whether Beijing invades Taiwan. As opposed to the opposition parties’ narrative of “vote for the DPP and young people go to war,” the global community has the impression that a pro-China party would actually bring about a cross-strait war. The reason is fairly simple: Pro-China parties would lower the nation’s guard, thereby making things easy for China.
Aso told reporters that he felt assured after Lai demonstrated his resolve and determination to safeguard Taiwan. This means that Japan feels Taiwan can only keep China at bay with pro-Taiwan parties securing half of the legislative seats and Lai’s administration in office.
Taiwan’s future, of course, eventually rests in the hands of Taiwanese themselves. Former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) once quoted French philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre’s idea that “man is completely free and responsible for himself, but also responsible for all men.”
Taiwan’s public is responsible for casting a ballot that might change the world, and this is the very first step for Taiwanese holding the reins to the nation’s future.
Shogo Lim is a member of the Japan chapter of World United Formosans for Independence and a member of the Taiwan Statebuilding Party.
Translated by Rita Wang
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS