Cartoon not discriminatory
Recently, a Taoyuan high-school student’s cartoon titled The Emperor’s Clause won a special prize at the National Student Art Competition. The cartoon depicted a pedestrian as an emperor crossing the street slowly, and it drew criticism from Internet celebrity Cheap, who accused the artwork of discriminating against disadvantaged pedestrians and even demanded that the organizers take back the prize. When some Internet users expressed different views, Cheap replied: “I dare you to mock the indigenous peoples, homosexuals and women’s rights in the name of freedom of creation.”
This has now turned a simple art competition into a complex social issue.
It all started with a CNN report last year titled: “Taiwan’s ‘living hell’ traffic is a tourism problem, say critics.” To rid Taiwan of this bad reputation, the Ministry of Transportation and Communications increased the penalty for not giving way to pedestrians to NT$6,000, with a demerit of three points from June 31. A driver accumulating 12 points in a year will have their driver’s license suspended for two months and be required to take a road safety course.
The rule has been implemented for more than five months and it has been quite effective. Drivers are giving way to pedestrians, although we still occasionally see pedestrians being hesitant about crossing the road, or some looking at their cellphones or walking slowly on the crosswalk, which makes drivers waiting to turn feel anxious as the traffic light is about to turn red.
As a driver and pedestrian myself, I found the cartoon funny, as I am sure many others did. Most people would not actually plod over crossings accompanied by a tortoise as in the cartoon. Few, I am sure, would feel offended or discriminated against. They would simply see the funny side.
The point of the cartoon is to call on pedestrians and drivers to respect each other. There is no intended malice or discrimination.
One can compare this with comments made a few days ago by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) vice presidential candidate Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康), who said: “People in Taipei like to quarrel, while people in the south like to fight.”
I was born in southern Taiwan but grew up in Taipei. I do consider Jaw’s words discriminatory.
Hsieh Chih-chieh
Taipei
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS