Cartoon not discriminatory
Recently, a Taoyuan high-school student’s cartoon titled The Emperor’s Clause won a special prize at the National Student Art Competition. The cartoon depicted a pedestrian as an emperor crossing the street slowly, and it drew criticism from Internet celebrity Cheap, who accused the artwork of discriminating against disadvantaged pedestrians and even demanded that the organizers take back the prize. When some Internet users expressed different views, Cheap replied: “I dare you to mock the indigenous peoples, homosexuals and women’s rights in the name of freedom of creation.”
This has now turned a simple art competition into a complex social issue.
It all started with a CNN report last year titled: “Taiwan’s ‘living hell’ traffic is a tourism problem, say critics.” To rid Taiwan of this bad reputation, the Ministry of Transportation and Communications increased the penalty for not giving way to pedestrians to NT$6,000, with a demerit of three points from June 31. A driver accumulating 12 points in a year will have their driver’s license suspended for two months and be required to take a road safety course.
The rule has been implemented for more than five months and it has been quite effective. Drivers are giving way to pedestrians, although we still occasionally see pedestrians being hesitant about crossing the road, or some looking at their cellphones or walking slowly on the crosswalk, which makes drivers waiting to turn feel anxious as the traffic light is about to turn red.
As a driver and pedestrian myself, I found the cartoon funny, as I am sure many others did. Most people would not actually plod over crossings accompanied by a tortoise as in the cartoon. Few, I am sure, would feel offended or discriminated against. They would simply see the funny side.
The point of the cartoon is to call on pedestrians and drivers to respect each other. There is no intended malice or discrimination.
One can compare this with comments made a few days ago by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) vice presidential candidate Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康), who said: “People in Taipei like to quarrel, while people in the south like to fight.”
I was born in southern Taiwan but grew up in Taipei. I do consider Jaw’s words discriminatory.
Hsieh Chih-chieh
Taipei
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS