Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Vice Chairman Andrew Hsia (夏立言) headed to China again on Wednesday and is scheduled to stay for more than two weeks, media reports said. As the presidential election is less than one month away, it is strange that a party grandee such as Hsia is traveling to China instead of staying to help with the campaign or to help its KMT presidential ticket to prepare and overcome their weakness on foreign policy. This had people wondering what could be so important that Hsia needs to leave the battlefield at such a critical moment.
When Hsia was interviewed by the media in October, he said that the KMT has been mislabeled as a pro-China party. The remark has drawn ire from China’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO), which said his remarks “undermine mutual trust and hurt the feelings of compatriots.”
In contrast, the very same Hsia accused of hurting mutual trust and feelings was two months later allowed to stay in Beijing for two weeks. Something must have happened in between.
To step up on election interference, Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Politburo Standing Committee member Wang Huning (王滬寧) held a meeting earlier this month to “coordinate” the Chinese government efforts, intelligence gathered by Taipei has shown. Members working for the CCP always follow orders given from the upper echelons. To evade responsibility, frontline party members only carry out orders when their superiors give them the green light. Under such circumstances, Hsia’s trip this time could have a lot to do with Wang, who is adept at employing “united front” tactics.
If Hsia has nothing to hide about his trip to China, he could have announced the trip to the public in advance instead of letting the media break the news. His secrecy only indicates that something fishy is going on.
Huang Wei-ping is a former think tank researcher and a Kaohsiung resident.
Translated by Rita Wang
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then