Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Vice Chairman Andrew Hsia (夏立言) headed to China again on Wednesday and is scheduled to stay for more than two weeks, media reports said. As the presidential election is less than one month away, it is strange that a party grandee such as Hsia is traveling to China instead of staying to help with the campaign or to help its KMT presidential ticket to prepare and overcome their weakness on foreign policy. This had people wondering what could be so important that Hsia needs to leave the battlefield at such a critical moment.
When Hsia was interviewed by the media in October, he said that the KMT has been mislabeled as a pro-China party. The remark has drawn ire from China’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO), which said his remarks “undermine mutual trust and hurt the feelings of compatriots.”
In contrast, the very same Hsia accused of hurting mutual trust and feelings was two months later allowed to stay in Beijing for two weeks. Something must have happened in between.
To step up on election interference, Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Politburo Standing Committee member Wang Huning (王滬寧) held a meeting earlier this month to “coordinate” the Chinese government efforts, intelligence gathered by Taipei has shown. Members working for the CCP always follow orders given from the upper echelons. To evade responsibility, frontline party members only carry out orders when their superiors give them the green light. Under such circumstances, Hsia’s trip this time could have a lot to do with Wang, who is adept at employing “united front” tactics.
If Hsia has nothing to hide about his trip to China, he could have announced the trip to the public in advance instead of letting the media break the news. His secrecy only indicates that something fishy is going on.
Huang Wei-ping is a former think tank researcher and a Kaohsiung resident.
Translated by Rita Wang
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS