Amendments to the National Security Act (國家安全法) imposing harsher punishments for “economic espionage,” which were passed last year, were put into effect on Monday.
Offenders now face five to 12 years in prison or a fine of NT$5 million to NT$100 million (US$159,908 to US$3.2 million) if they obtain, use or leak trade secrets of the nation’s 22 core key technologies to China, Hong Kong, Macau or foreign hostile forces.
It is interesting that, although the law was amended arguably due to an increasing number of acts of espionage committed on behalf of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) in recent years, it continues to stipulate lesser punishments for some forms of treason committed for the PRC.
For example, Article 7 of the act stipulates a prison term of up to seven years for “any person, who intends to endanger national security or social stability and commits an offense under Paragraph 1 of Article 2 [Initiating, funding, hosting, manipulating, directing or developing an organization] for Mainland China.”
The same offense committed for any “area other than Mainland China” is punishable with a prison term of up to 10 years.
This distinction is made because the Republic of China (ROC) fails to recognize the existence of the PRC. That failure might have made sense in the time of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and his two successors, but given that Taiwan today has regular exchanges with the PRC, there is no justifiable reason to not recognize the PRC’s existence — nor would doing so conflict with the ROC’s persistent sovereignty claims over the territory administered by the PRC. A government can exist without a state (the exiled government of Tibet is one example), and governments frequently conflict with one another over sovereignty claims.
That the ROC’s law does not recognize the PRC administration or clearly define the statehood of the PRC means that judges in Taiwan have often been reluctant to impose heavy punishments on those convicted in espionage cases involving the PRC.
However, courts might be starting to realize the gravity of the situation facing Taiwan. In October, the High Court sentenced retired air force colonel Liu Sheng-shu (劉聖恕) to 20 years in jail for his role in an espionage network for China. Two other officers received similar sentences in the case.
This is a promising development that could hopefully deter others in the military, which has been plagued by numerous espionage cases in the past few years.
In August, the Taiwan Statebuilding Party (TSP) held a press conference calling for stricter punishments for Taiwanese spying for China.
“Chinese espionage is rampant in Taiwan, because people here are confused about their national identity and the punishments for spying are very lenient,” TSP Chairman Wang Hsing-huan (王興煥) said.
The ROC political system does not recognize the PRC as a foreign country, or as an enemy, which means the judicial system cannot treat Chinese espionage as foreign aggression, Wang said.
Liu’s 20-year prison term gives hope that judicial leniency might be coming to an end for China’s spies, but the work of judges would be made easier by a legal system that correctly acknowledges the PRC as a foreign aggressor. Taiwanese officials and members of the armed forces should be prohibited from having any contact with people in China.
Similarly, those working on key technologies should not be permitted to have contact with anyone in China. No business deal or exchange of any kind in China is done without the involvement of the Chinese Communist Party.
Taiwan must amend laws to recognize PRC sovereignty and to treat citizens of China, Hong Kong and Macau the same as people from all other foreign countries.
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s